Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Whipple vs. Procharger >

Whipple vs. Procharger

Notices

Whipple vs. Procharger

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-11-2011 | 07:48 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
My sentiments too, if you run efi they both need to have efi mapping done to have it right in most applications, I own a pc but I think the whipples look much better BUT I'm not into looks, i'm into hp, Smitty
Yep, and if you don't have an EFI engine you'll need a stand alone system for either one, that's why I questioned the "whipples are easier to tune" comment. If you can't make huge power easily with a centrifigul and have excellent driveability with good docking manners, then you are doing something wrong...


As an upgrade to a factory efi engine the whipple kits are tough to beat and Dustin's tunes are excellent. But it's pretty obvious by now which one makes more power.
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 05-12-2011 | 08:39 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Default

yeap...putting mine together right now..HP500 +.030 509 M3SC...was on a EFI swithing to a pro systems blow thru carb...much easier to tune than the merc ECM's
ezstriper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-12-2011 | 09:04 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 774
Likes: 1
From: Wild n Reckless From North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
With the procharger you wouldn't need to spend the money on the heads to make 800+HP and you could do a simple blow thru set up if you didn't want the extra cost of an EFI system.
Why not heads?
Pokher Ace is offline  
Reply
Old 05-12-2011 | 09:28 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Splendora, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mrfixxall
+1,, also they are not as hard on the drives under 2500 rpm's..if you have the room in front of the engine go with a crank mount set up..wikked!http://www.cachassisworks.com/cac_su...rgerdrive.html
The crank mount set up is cool, but what if you need a pulley for your waterpump and hydraulic steering? I am not an engine builder.
UrbanDisturbance is offline  
Reply
Old 05-12-2011 | 09:47 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

Originally Posted by Pokher Ace
Why not heads?
That was a response to 47Excalibur who suggested you'd need Dart Pro1 335cnc heads and a 4.0l Whipple to make 800+. Normally he gives cam specs too, but I didn't see them this time...

If you wanted to spend the money on those heads you could, but with a procharger it wouldn't be necessary and in my opinion are too big for a 509. I made 1305hp with a 555 running as cast AFR 325's and an M4 on 92 octane. Look at Kennyo's post and the power he made with factory iron heads. Procharger's rock!
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-2011 | 10:04 PM
  #16  
zt260's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Hudson River, NY
Default

If pro chargers and whipples were the same cost the answer is much simpler. The reason is pretty strait forward. Very few would pick a pro charger over a whipple for the same money. I have a quad rotor and I have yet to hear anyone say they bought a whipple to save money. They buy whipples for simplicity and looks. I believe the whipple with the calmap efi system from dfi is the best setup going, but far from the cheapest. That comes from someone who doesn't particularly care for Dustin Whipple.
zt260 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-2011 | 12:54 PM
  #17  
Whipple Charged's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 5
From: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Default

Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
Something might be off with your current combo.. Your power seems a little low. The Procharger will make more power then the Whipple every time.
Try keeping something factual. "Every time"? Pretty bold statement.

PC does not make more power, the SC efficiencies are nearly identical when compared size for size. It comes down to supercharger size, intercooler size, engine combo and proper setup.

As for setup, on carb's, theres no question a Whipple is easier to tune and doesn't require "special" setups such as blow-thru styles. For EFI, there pretty much equal for calibration work, both require custom calibrations for custom applications.

Last edited by Whipple Charged; 05-16-2011 at 12:58 PM.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-2011 | 01:03 PM
  #18  
Whipple Charged's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 5
From: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Default

Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
That was a response to 47Excalibur who suggested you'd need Dart Pro1 335cnc heads and a 4.0l Whipple to make 800+. Normally he gives cam specs too, but I didn't see them this time...

If you wanted to spend the money on those heads you could, but with a procharger it wouldn't be necessary and in my opinion are too big for a 509. I made 1305hp with a 555 running as cast AFR 325's and an M4 on 92 octane. Look at Kennyo's post and the power he made with factory iron heads. Procharger's rock!
Better cylinder heads always help a combo. But by no means "required". The stock 525's make nearly 800hp and they have Edelbrock heads (although not as good as standard Edelbrock BB heads). It doesn't matter what SC you have, a better flowing cylinder head will make more power or the same power with increased reliability. Lowering the inlet restriction lowers parasitic losses as well as manifold temp, while increasing flow.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-2011 | 06:42 PM
  #19  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

http://www.procharger.com/f4supercharger/index.shtml
GPM is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-2011 | 08:18 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
Try keeping something factual. "Every time"? Pretty bold statement.
I'll stand by that statement and take the challenge anytime...

Last edited by HaxbySpeed; 05-16-2011 at 08:21 PM.
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.