Whipple vs. Procharger
#11
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
As an upgrade to a factory efi engine the whipple kits are tough to beat and Dustin's tunes are excellent. But it's pretty obvious by now which one makes more power.
#13
Registered
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 774
Likes: 1
From: Wild n Reckless From North Texas
#14
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Splendora, TX
+1,, also they are not as hard on the drives under 2500 rpm's..if you have the room in front of the engine go with a crank mount set up..wikked!http://www.cachassisworks.com/cac_su...rgerdrive.html
#15
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
That was a response to 47Excalibur who suggested you'd need Dart Pro1 335cnc heads and a 4.0l Whipple to make 800+. Normally he gives cam specs too, but I didn't see them this time... 
If you wanted to spend the money on those heads you could, but with a procharger it wouldn't be necessary and in my opinion are too big for a 509. I made 1305hp with a 555 running as cast AFR 325's and an M4 on 92 octane. Look at Kennyo's post and the power he made with factory iron heads. Procharger's rock!

If you wanted to spend the money on those heads you could, but with a procharger it wouldn't be necessary and in my opinion are too big for a 509. I made 1305hp with a 555 running as cast AFR 325's and an M4 on 92 octane. Look at Kennyo's post and the power he made with factory iron heads. Procharger's rock!
#16
If pro chargers and whipples were the same cost the answer is much simpler. The reason is pretty strait forward. Very few would pick a pro charger over a whipple for the same money. I have a quad rotor and I have yet to hear anyone say they bought a whipple to save money. They buy whipples for simplicity and looks. I believe the whipple with the calmap efi system from dfi is the best setup going, but far from the cheapest. That comes from someone who doesn't particularly care for Dustin Whipple.
#17
PC does not make more power, the SC efficiencies are nearly identical when compared size for size. It comes down to supercharger size, intercooler size, engine combo and proper setup.
As for setup, on carb's, theres no question a Whipple is easier to tune and doesn't require "special" setups such as blow-thru styles. For EFI, there pretty much equal for calibration work, both require custom calibrations for custom applications.
Last edited by Whipple Charged; 05-16-2011 at 12:58 PM.
#18
That was a response to 47Excalibur who suggested you'd need Dart Pro1 335cnc heads and a 4.0l Whipple to make 800+. Normally he gives cam specs too, but I didn't see them this time... 
If you wanted to spend the money on those heads you could, but with a procharger it wouldn't be necessary and in my opinion are too big for a 509. I made 1305hp with a 555 running as cast AFR 325's and an M4 on 92 octane. Look at Kennyo's post and the power he made with factory iron heads. Procharger's rock!

If you wanted to spend the money on those heads you could, but with a procharger it wouldn't be necessary and in my opinion are too big for a 509. I made 1305hp with a 555 running as cast AFR 325's and an M4 on 92 octane. Look at Kennyo's post and the power he made with factory iron heads. Procharger's rock!

#19
Registered

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
#20
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC


