Hydrolocked my motor
#71
Dave, do yourself a favor, and throw that cam as far away as you can, and then change your risers anyway you can. I assume that you saw what happened when the reasons for your issues were pointed out by someone who knows in an other location. all the correct info was deleted, because they needed to protect their own. You will get and have been getting the correct story here on OSO. stick to this and you will be fine. Ask yourself how you spent $9000 with their help and only gained 40 HP from stock. If you want to rebuild that motor, and make HP with it, ask here, and you will be way ahead in money and no broken parts.
Last edited by blue thunder; 02-14-2012 at 05:31 PM.
#72
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Dave, do yourself a favor, and throw that cam as far away as you can, and then change your risers anyway you can. I assume that you saw what happened when the reasons for your issues were pointed out by someone who knows in an other location. all the correct info was deleted, because they needed to protect their own. You will get and have been getting the correct story here on OSO. stick to this and you will be fine. Ask yourself how you spent $9000 with their help and only gained 40 HP from stock. If you want to rebuild that motor, and make HP with it, ask here, and you will be way ahead in money and no broken parts.
As far as the Cam goes, The Boat ran great with it for 40 hrs, and I was very happy with it. Economical, very strong low end.. yes it died out on top, but that's not what I was after. I doubt it was the cause of my troubles.. But, for the sake of argument, what is it about this grind that makes it prone to reversion or Detonation that your so sure of. I'm a very objective type, and am willing to hear any and all rational explanations.
I totally agree with you on the risers.. I'm going to have them extended all the way to the transom "dry", and eliminate the Silent choice.. I never used it anyways..LOL!
#73
If you are running stock riser with that cam it would be a problem. You should see that problem as first a milkshakey crankcase oil situation. The exhaust lift is odd on the cam in combo with the intake lift, but that should just make it act like a smaller cam than the .650 suggests. None of this should cause the seat to fall out of a good set of heads. I really think you need a good set of alum marine heads with the right seat pressure (180 is way high) and ferria type valves and good springs. The aluminum will also give you a little additional margin if your comp is on the high side.
#74
Got it out yesterday, and here's what I found
Took a big gulp of water, dropped #7 exhaust seat which disintegrated and went throughout most of the cylinders via the Intake manifold.... still trying to wrap my head around this one.
Gonna pull the lower end apart today..
Took a big gulp of water, dropped #7 exhaust seat which disintegrated and went throughout most of the cylinders via the Intake manifold.... still trying to wrap my head around this one.
Gonna pull the lower end apart today..
#76
Registered

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 31
As far as the Cam goes, The Boat ran great with it for 40 hrs, and I was very happy with it. Economical, very strong low end.. yes it died out on top, but that's not what I was after. I doubt it was the cause of my troubles.. But, for the sake of argument, what is it about this grind that makes it prone to reversion or Detonation that your so sure of. I'm a very objective type, and am willing to hear any and all rational explanations.
The super high spring pressures on your valve train all contribute to issues with those heads. You usually run those kind of pressures with solid lifters and/or when you are spinning high RPM, which you weren't doing. No 540 HP motors go there. high spring pressures smack that valve closed, and depending on the cam ramp rates smack it even harder. Thats not good on the heads/lifters for long life. My 509 which made 625 ish power ran rates of 145 on the seat, and its still running 7 years later and never been apart. You know, based on what you just said, that your exhaust was an issue with reversion.
Per one of your posts, the staggered jets on the stock HP500 are great. but you can get around it without them. Merc spent a ton of time figuring them out, but most of us don't have their R&D money. Plus you also said that you did plug readings, and they were fine. Once you change anything on the intake, and/or exhaust as you did with that cam, Merc's stock setting go out the window.
#77
Registered
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 1
From: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Gil manifolds and risers (short ones, yeah I know). This was originally a 1996 HP500, carbureted. Here's the "Sort Of"
509 ci GM Block
SRP's 9:1 comp
Tq plate and Plateau honed and Decked .015
GM forged crank, Dimple rods, 7/16arp's
.007 piston/cyl wall clr, .0022 Rods, .0025 mains, .0030 rear
088 heads, Bowl work, SS radius, sleeved for 11/32 valves, full radius exh, 5 angle int. REV valves
Heads milled .020, 121CC, flowed 356@700, 242@700
Hyd roller (Morels), Cam (224/650, 235/603). 112 Lobe sep, 180# on the seat @1.95
Crane Gold rollers
Dart single plane, 830 HP carb.
Idled 900rpm, 12 deg initial, 37deg total
Cranking time was not the issue..
509 ci GM Block
SRP's 9:1 comp
Tq plate and Plateau honed and Decked .015
GM forged crank, Dimple rods, 7/16arp's
.007 piston/cyl wall clr, .0022 Rods, .0025 mains, .0030 rear
088 heads, Bowl work, SS radius, sleeved for 11/32 valves, full radius exh, 5 angle int. REV valves
Heads milled .020, 121CC, flowed 356@700, 242@700
Hyd roller (Morels), Cam (224/650, 235/603). 112 Lobe sep, 180# on the seat @1.95
Crane Gold rollers
Dart single plane, 830 HP carb.
Idled 900rpm, 12 deg initial, 37deg total
Cranking time was not the issue..
...anyways i advanced the cam 2* and backed down the timing to 34* total..ran way better in the big end and i even picked up 200 rpm.s..
#78
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
#79
Registered

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 31
The super high spring pressures on your valve train all contribute to issues with those heads. You usually run those kind of pressures with solid lifters and/or when you are spinning high RPM, which you weren't doing. No 540 HP motors go there. high spring pressures smack that valve closed, and depending on the cam ramp rates smack it even harder. Thats not good on the heads/lifters for long life. My 509 which made 625 ish power ran rates of 145 on the seat, and its still running 7 years later and never been apart. You know, based on what you just said, that your exhaust was an issue with reversion.
Last edited by Zone 5; 02-15-2012 at 12:34 AM.



