Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Stupid cam shaft idea?  Serious question >

Stupid cam shaft idea? Serious question

Notices

Stupid cam shaft idea? Serious question

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-01-2014 | 11:56 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 191
Default Stupid cam shaft idea? Serious question

What would be the expected results of taling
a basic 454/330 8.5:1 flat top pistons (stock) motor with improved breathing - intake manifold, heads (781's with 2.25/1.88 valves), good exhaust stock cam, running well
installing a good used set of 1.8 roller rockers, again changing nothing else.
Really interested to hear, anybody else here try this?
GLENAMY 242SS is online now  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 12:00 AM
  #2  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,150
Likes: 3,710
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Stock sucks.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 12:03 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 191
Default

So do jet engines but neither have 1.8:1 roller rockers
GLENAMY 242SS is online now  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 01:56 AM
  #4  
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
From: Omaha Ne
Default

Why even bother? I don't believe you will gain anything but a headache.
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 05:57 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: peabody mass
Default

at least you can use the heads and intake on the new motor
mach1magnum is offline  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 06:23 AM
  #6  
vintage chromoly's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 18
From: cleveland ohio
Default

Sell the roller rockers and use the 150 bucks for fuel.
vintage chromoly is offline  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 06:33 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 918
Likes: 5
Default

The first half of the title of original post, is the answer
motor is offline  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:00 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 2
From: Great Sacandaga Lake, NY
Default

20HP, maybe..
Rattlesnake Jake is offline  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:21 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 191
Default

Seriously, there are a lot of decent running reliable older 454/330 out there, everybody says to change the cam, i was wondering if this may be a cheap easy way of trying to improve on what everybody knows is a major restriction to these.
Not everybody knows how or wants to or can even pull motor and change cam. Anybody can change rockers.
GLENAMY 242SS is online now  
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:33 AM
  #10  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 570
Likes: 47
From: cincinnati,oh.
Default

Originally Posted by GLENAMY 242SS
What would be the expected results of taling
a basic 454/330 8.5:1 flat top pistons (stock) motor with improved breathing - intake manifold, heads (781's with 2.25/1.88 valves), good exhaust stock cam, running well
installing a good used set of 1.8 roller rockers, again changing nothing else.
Really interested to hear, anybody else here try this?
About .020 more lift and that's about it. I don't think you will see any performance.
fbc25el is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.