Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
air fuel ratio with boost >

air fuel ratio with boost

Notices

air fuel ratio with boost

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-28-2015 | 12:59 PM
  #31  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,168
From: taxachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll



Well there you have it. Everyone should target 12.7 then because anecdotal evidence
Can you read,,,I said this is what we saw.we tried a quick fix,it really didn't work.we sent the computes out to be reprogrammed.12.7 is a grenade waiting to happen.alot of 1075 owners don't have a clue what's happening in their combustion chambers,,hope they'll look and get a retune.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 01:04 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, Oh
Default

Im very surprised its that rich, the cats must be pretty upset when its that rich.

Guess what EGT's the Ford ECOboost can resist for hours on end????
Baldie is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 01:09 PM
  #33  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by sutphen 30
Can you read,,,I said this is what we saw.we tried a quick fix,it really didn't work.we sent the computes out to be reprogrammed.12.7 is a grenade waiting to happen.alot of 1075 owners don't have a clue what's happening in their combustion chambers,,hope they'll look and get a retune.
I've read everything you wrote and you never made that clear.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 01:22 PM
  #34  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,168
From: taxachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by sutphen 30
Don't bet
The 2 I've put widebands on would run in the 13 at cruise and only drop to 12.7/9.real scary,tried adjusting regulator for more fuel up top and it did nothing but richen the bottom a little.ended up having Marc boos add some fuel.
And the timing they run,wow.I'd never tune like that.
Seem pretty clear
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 01:26 PM
  #35  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 60
From: Boston MA
Default

Mercury runs the 1075 on the lean side. At WOT they get closer to 11.7/12.0afr ... cruise range is in the high 12s, low 13s .. Mercury, Whipple , Mark Boos are the only ones i know that have the software to make changes. the only thing you can do is crank up the fuel pressure from 60 to 62lbs to try and cheat the computer.. anything more the computer knows bc it monitors fuel pressure. Also the 1075 will go 150-175 hrs no problem, then just change springs,lifters, rockers and belts etc
47EXCALIBUR is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 05:13 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 3
From: FredVegas, Va
Default

Some good info in this thread, and I thank you guys for it.
TooLateVTEC is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 05:30 PM
  #37  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Baldie

Guess what EGT's the Ford ECOboost can resist for hours on end????
Probably about the same as a 1075.... They have about the same refresh schedule, don't they?


(Sorry, had to take the slow pitch down the middle. )

Last edited by Speedracer29; 01-28-2015 at 05:33 PM.
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 05:55 PM
  #38  
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,748
Likes: 869
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

What are the readings from 650-4000 RPM though?
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 06:54 PM
  #39  
phughes69's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 169
From: St. Clair Shores, MI
Default

Here is my thought. The Corvette is direct injected so they can control spark knock WAY better, but the intercooler has a finite supply of cool water, so to compensate, just flood the engine.
The 1075 on the other hand has an unlimited supply of cool water for the intercooler, so they can run it leaner and with more timing.
And another thing is how good would it look for GM to say you have to have the engine in your $120,000 car rebuilt every 6-12 months, vs Mercruiser, say Oh you just bought 2 of our $80,000 engines, the maintenance schedule on those engines is a rebuild every 150 hours, but that is OK because we know you can afford it, and that is the accepted norm for your type of boating.
phughes69 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 07:39 PM
  #40  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by phughes69
Here is my thought. The Corvette is direct injected so they can control spark knock WAY better, but the intercooler has a finite supply of cool water, so to compensate, just flood the engine.
The 1075 on the other hand has an unlimited supply of cool water for the intercooler, so they can run it leaner and with more timing.
And another thing is how good would it look for GM to say you have to have the engine in your $120,000 car rebuilt every 6-12 months, vs Mercruiser, say Oh you just bought 2 of our $80,000 engines, the maintenance schedule on those engines is a rebuild every 150 hours, but that is OK because we know you can afford it, and that is the accepted norm for your type of boating.
Listen guys. The ZR1 is NOT direct injected. ZR1 is a C6. Direct injection made its debut on the C7.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.