Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   Rods (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/332881-rods.html)

Full Force 12-03-2015 08:19 PM

he could get 2-300 for old rods all day long.... I have sold a few used sets they always pull that just helps even more!!

buck35 12-03-2015 09:06 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4382060)
Buck, Your average cost to rebuild a set of used rods, is around 150 bucks these days, give or take. . New ARP2000 bolts, are around 150 bucks as well. That's 300 dollars you're spending, to recondition, and upgrade your old rods, Eagles in Dan's case.

A brand new set of Eagles, are 500 bucks, WITH ARP 2000 bolts. Now, this new rod will also have to be checked out for roundness, , pin fitted, etc.

Dan could sell his old rods, on ebay, or whereever, and probably get 150-200 bucks easy. So, its a no brainer to me, to simply buy brand new rods, that havent been fatigued, etc. He does not know the history of them, how old they truly are, etc. If he was going to reuse them in a 500hp deal, maybe it be worth saving a couple bucks keeping them, but in a 900hp blower engine, ehhh,...its one thing to even use that rod in this application according to some, let alone saving a case of bud light worth of money, to rebuild the old stuff. I mean, I think he's fine either way, but sometimes, when its only a few bucks, going new is nice sometimes.

Just to give you an idea what is involved in reconditioning rods, look here

http://www.enginebuildermag.com/2007...nnecting-rods/

Good read, and as previously mentioned not arguing just asking as many people's budgets get tight during rebuilds, as costs can spiral out of control in a hurry.

abmotorman 12-03-2015 09:44 PM

Personally I never rebuild rods. As a old crank grinder i'm extremely picky when it come to re-sizing. i've yet to see a perfectly square machine / hone job. As for changing rod bolts, as we know caps will shift requiring re-sizing and balancing. Pressed pin style get to go through the heater again. I've used H-beam Eagle with good success. Never been an import fan though. I like to spend time on the complete rotating assemble. if it spins, it goes on the balancer after the crank and harmonic balancer are done first.

Wait, it's winter. We are talking rod bolts without drama so far? Is this OSO or too early yet? AB

mike tkach 12-03-2015 10:23 PM


Originally Posted by abmotorman (Post 4382089)
Personally I never rebuild rods. As a old crank grinder i'm extremely picky when it come to re-sizing. i've yet to see a perfectly square machine / hone job. As for changing rod bolts, as we know caps will shift requiring re-sizing and balancing. Pressed pin style get to go through the heater again. I've used H-beam Eagle with good success. Never been an import fan though. I like to spend time on the complete rotating assemble. if it spins, it goes on the balancer after the crank and harmonic balancer are done first.

Wait, it's winter. We are talking rod bolts without drama so far? Is this OSO or too early yet? AB

my guess is the threat of getting banned is real,i am liking the tranquility.

mike tkach 12-03-2015 10:29 PM


Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL (Post 4382031)
What if I`m emotionally attached to my current rods?

in that case take a picture of them before you list them on ebay!

horsepower1 12-04-2015 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by SB (Post 4381950)
Well, we know how many stock 502 shortblocks with GM 7/16" 6.135 rod has been hammerd and all has been well. 800+hp even. Everyone remember, 4.00 stroke. When these are ever torn down, many people will rebuild with a stronger rod bolt, just because.

Now, with the 4.25" stroke motors how many stock rods where kept ? Probably not many, therefore we really won't know. Most step up to a 6.385 rod (or longer in some cases) and thus aftmkt rods and bolts.

Longer strokes = more piston speed.

Longer stroke = more piston acceleration and then only if the rod stays the same. If you keep the rod ratio the same then the piston acceleration will remain the same. This is why you go to a longer rod with more stroke.
4" with 6.135 rod = 1.53 ratio
4.25" with 6.135 rod = 1.44
4.25 with 6.385 = 1.50
We build a lot of 532" (4.6 bore x 4.0 stroke) combinations with a 6.535 rod and that seems to be a really nice combination. Puts the rod ratio @ 1.63 and these engines always seem to make great power with exceptional tq curves.

horsepower1 12-04-2015 07:29 AM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4382056)
Paging thru some catalogs on these price related rods. Fwiw, heres what Im seeing. For 6.385 H Beam, with ARP2000 bolts except compstar, those have L19s.

Molnar 729 grams

Eagle 785 grams

K1 technologies 740 grams

Manley 810 grams

Engine pro 809 grams

Lunati 790 grams

Callies Compstar 816 grams

A visual difference I noticed, out of all of them, is the Callies Compstar rod, has a reinforced area on the cap. Design wise, they all about look the same. The Molnars and K1's, look to maybe have a slightly narrower beam. Thats just looking at various photos though.

The K1's and Molnars do have narrower beams but the webbing is thicker. I'm pretty sure Tom Molnar owns K1.

horsepower1 12-04-2015 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4381929)
I always figured they just last if not broken for any reason, I also always wondered what is stronger? H beam or I beam? the H looks stronger but seems many high end rods are I beam. is it more about the weight?

You could ask all the different rod manufacturers that question and all their engineers, and at the end of the day you'll not get a definitive answer. Stronger how? In compression and column strength? In bending? In twisting? Tensile strength? Resistance to fatigue? Both designs have their strengths and weaknesses. Is it a high HP build, or is rpm a main consideration?

This is a pretty easy to read and easy to follow write up on rods, designs and applications:
http://www.enginebuildermag.com/2008...-many-choices/

mike tkach 12-04-2015 07:39 AM

scott,the longer the stroke the faster the piston travels per revalution period.the piston has more distance to travel so it has to go faster,this is why it is harder on the rod on the exhaust stroke.it is my understanding that rod angel is not as important as it was once thought to be.

horsepower1 12-04-2015 07:49 AM


Originally Posted by mike tkach (Post 4382132)
scott,the longer the stroke the faster the piston travels per revalution period.the piston has more distance to travel so it has to go faster,this is why it is harder on the rod on the exhaust stroke.it is my understanding that rod angel is not as important as it was once thought to be.

Mike, you're right but I'm talking about piston acceleration, not mean piston speed. Piston acceleration is where the main difference lies with different rod lengths/ratios.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.