![]() |
I am 9.5:1 now.... That may change a little not sure yet..
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4487076)
Yeh, 114 doesn't thrillme, but a call can have that changed.
What compression on those? I'd have to look back somehow and find FF's compression...I think it's close to 9:1. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4487107)
My controlled induction 2016 cam software, suggests for Tim's engine, max rpm of 6000, A 252/260 108 LSA 654/680 lift cam.
My dyno simulator, with tims 241/246, 112 LSA cam, shows a peak HP of 658HP at, 5500 with his components( prob not far off if tim had dynoed with no accessories and dyno headers). Switching to the cam softwares 252/260, hp peak goes up to 699 at 6000RPM. Switching that 252/260, from a 108 LSA, to a 112 LSA with a 110ICL, the HP climbs again, to 711hp at 6000. Going to a 114, with a 110 ICL, drops it big time, to 683HP at 6000rpm. So, back to the 252/260, 112 LSA setup. Sim say 711HP at 6000RPM. Thats with a CFM rating of 1000CFM. Bumping that, to a 1250 CFM, the engine is now making 728HP at 6000RPM. Peak torque, still in the 4500RPM range. Now, granted thats just pplaying around with a software program, but that certainly seems fairly in line with this guys claims? Here is a few that I have built for power boats. 540-548 bbc's, ported Iron eagle 308 heads, not radical porting, but detail work, chamber work, ex port work, the intake received attention thru the whole runner, about 320cc ish when done. 10:1, the Dart single plane that came on the boat originaly, on the mecruiser HP 500 502, Custom comp hydraulic roller, 252-260 at .050, .640 lift, 112 lobe sep. For numerous reasons. Did like 8-10 of those, either 540's or 548's out of the original 502 blocks. THey would make 715-730 hp, and about the same for tq, peaked about 5800 for hp, in the 4500ish for tq, depending on carbs used. And they rocked. Also built similar engines, but made them 509's, using the stock crank, they would make about 680hp and about 665 for tq, but, I would pull the duration back to 248-256,to keep the same rpm range.They would actualy go 6000-6200 for peak hp, same lobe family, so the lift was the same, and the same 112 lobe sep. |
My heads and intakes will be touched up, port marched and flowed before I even think about cams, that's per my buddy that's helping me get this fixed up, I am gonna ask him if bumping compression from 9.5 to 9.8 will hurt anything, I run 93 no matter what also so that's not a concern for me... But that's where I am starting, I am gonna look at everyone's ideas but minimalist who actually influences me, as of now it's my buddy Bill, scott and Joe...
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487118)
My heads and intakes will be touched up, port marched and flowed before I even think about cams, that's per my buddy that's helping me get this fixed up, I am gonna ask him if bumping compression from 9.5 to 9.8 will hurt anything, I run 93 no matter what also so that's not a concern for me... But that's where I am starting, I am gonna look at everyone's ideas but minimalist who actually influences me, as of now it's my buddy Bill, scott and Joe...
|
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 4487117)
That is almost dead identical to my blower cam from MK I previously ran that am going to reuse as a start ( may very well have to up compression or change cam specs before im done) to my 540 n/a project with except its on a 114, shows like 708 theoretical hp with a little less compression, prob too much cam for compression I have but am going to run it anyways, Smitty
|
Has anyone ever verified flow of a 1050 carb 4150 style? Like for sure flow?
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487125)
Has anyone ever verified flow of a 1050 carb 4150 style? Like for sure flow?
|
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4487127)
Dale can flow the carb for you.
|
Tim, it would be nice if the guy doing your head+intake could flow your heads. Then flow heads with the intake then with intake & carb. You would probably learn something...
|
I may send it in, told wet best a 4150 will do is 940 CFm... At best ever.
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4487127)
Dale can flow the carb for you.
|
Will try to, the person doing it is very thorough and I think my results will be much different this time, or at least right, really wish I went this route last time, buddy said if I can find a way to fit a spacer I should, worth a good 10 hp in every case he's seen... Gotta see if I can find space for it... New challenge lol
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4487131)
Tim, it would be nice if the guy doing your head+intake could flow your heads. Then flow heads with the intake then with intake & carb. You would probably learn something...
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487135)
I may send it in, told wet best a 4150 will do is 940 CFm... At best ever.
You're gonna want to get on it. Dale is busy and your stuff gets worked on in the order it comes in no matter who you are. I'd have him go through the both carbs and ensure ithey are what ithey are supposed to be. Just like the heads, it's not unheard of for parts to be assembled incorrectly or with the wrong parts. |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4487114)
Were these the cams u sent me cam card?
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487136)
Will try to, the person doing it is very thorough and I think my results will be much different this time, or at least right, really wish I went this route last time, buddy said if I can find a way to fit a spacer I should, worth a good 10 hp in every case he's seen... Gotta see if I can find space for it... New challenge lol
|
Moving on with fixing, giving bill intake tomorrow, and keep moving on, get other engine out of boat adapter and take apart, still gotta mix all this with other things in life and now fall cleanup of yard that takes a lot of time... And car work... And my job ... Lol ugh too busy!!
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4487137)
I don't know why you wouldn't.
You're gonna want to get on it. Dale is busy and your stuff gets worked on in the order it comes in no matter who you are. I'd have him go through the both carbs and ensure ithey are what ithey are supposed to be. Just like the heads, it's not unheard of for parts to be assembled incorrectly or with the wrong parts. |
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487135)
I may send it in, told wet best a 4150 will do is 940 CFm... At best ever.
|
What you mean on top pan? Lost there lol
That being said about the mesh, I figure 3" is pushing it so I did t want to shorten it, wonder if anyone has flowed 3" vs 2" let's say... Hmm can't see it flowing enough but maybe? If I can go 2" I can add a 1" spacer
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4487139)
I had a couple ideas from looking at your bildge pics to gain some clearance... I would make a top pan for your arrestor but i would recess the top of the pan in the center so the top of the nut is even with the top of the pan. It would have a cup so to speak. Also trim some height out of the mesh in the arrestor. And lastly. If the bottom pan has a lip on it so it sits of the top of the carb make a flat bottom pan for it. With all that you could end up with an inch or two. We have a good machinist that custom makes us tops and bottoms on a Bridgeport. He actually has a table the he uses to but a nice raidused lip in the pans. Where there is a will there is a way...
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487141)
Moving on with fixing, giving bill intake tomorrow, and keep moving on, get other engine out of boat adapter and take apart, still gotta mix all this with other things in life and now fall cleanup of yard that takes a lot of time... And car work... And my job ... Lol ugh too busy!!
On a side note.....we are all going to the track Friday night to blow off some steam and see if we can break our cars. You should blow the dust off the cobra and join us. Give it some thought, be good to clear your head and burn some rubber! |
I mean actual flow not calculations that's all
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4487142)
A guy or two over at http://racingfuelsystems.myfunforum.org may know already. If not, by bore size, venturi size, base plate, and booster.
|
So I can blow up the Cobra?? Lol J/K I beat that car as hard as I can every time I drive it lol
I might have to work this move Friday night so not sure but maybe... If I don't work
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4487145)
Such is life. Try building a boat from a bare hull with a 1 1/2 and a3 1/2 year old running around the shop.
On a side note.....we are all going to the track Friday night to blow off some steam and see if we can break our cars. You should blow the dust off the cobra and join us. Give it some thought, be good to clear your head and burn some rubber! |
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487146)
I mean actual flow not calculations that's all
|
The top plate on the flame arrestor. The nut sits on top to bolt it down. The nut is 1/4". Recess the top plate so the nut isn't the highest point of the arrestor. Same the with the bottom. If it sits up off the carb just make a flat plate. That's gotta be over an 1" between the two. Then trim an inch out of the mesh. That's two inches more clearance. You can also increase the diameter of the top and bottom plates you have plenty of room around the sides...
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487149)
So I can blow up the Cobra?? Lol J/K I beat that car as hard as I can every time I drive it lol
I might have to work this move Friday night so not sure but maybe... If I don't work |
I wondered if lowering it and raising diameter would still flow enough hmmm
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4487152)
The top plate on the flame arrestor. The nut sits on top to bolt it down. The nut is 1/4". Recess the top plate so the nut isn't the highest point of the arrestor. Same the with the bottom. If it sits up off the carb just make a flat plate. That's gotta be over an 1" between the two. Then trim an inch out of the mesh. That's two inches more clearance. You can also increase the diameter of the top and bottom plates you have plenty of room around the sides...
|
Gotcha
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4487151)
I'm talking #;s they have from actual experience. Owner of forum is pretty smart and very experienced...same for a few others over there.
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487154)
I wondered if lowering it and raising diameter would still flow enough hmmm
:-) |
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487136)
Will try to, the person doing it is very thorough and I think my results will be much different this time, or at least right, really wish I went this route last time, buddy said if I can find a way to fit a spacer I should, worth a good 10 hp in every case he's seen... Gotta see if I can find space for it... New challenge lol
I pretty much suggested a dominator from the get go on this build. That thread was a whole nother chit show of arguing. You said no way, because you couldn't fit it. Now, you're willing to find room, to fit a spacer under your current carb, and worried your carb is too small?! lol :angry-smiley-038: I think this time around, you might be best to do your own engine development. What I mean is, taking advice from 30 different avenues, is not necessarily a bad thing, but at the end of the day, strapping the thing on a dyno, and trying out various carbs, various intakes, swapping exhaust, etc. Sometimes, what looks great on paper, doesn't always work. You know Ryan Retter is flexible with you, and will work with you to try different things on the dyno, and won't nickel and dime you for the time. Theres no point in cutting up your hatch, if its a 10hp gain. Now, if you find a particular intake/carb combo, that nets you 25, 35, 40+hp , you may want to modify the hatch. Same thing with exhaust. You might find 10hp from switching from your manifolds to a header setup, or you might find 50hp. That might sway you to looking into different exhaust, or keeping what you have. But, you gotta do the testing. What works on one guys engine, might not work on yours. BCK spent some time on fine tuning his intake/carb combo. He found what , like 25hp doing so? Thats not a bad gain at all. We have enough of us here, that I am sure someone would be willing to loan out an intake, a carb, maybe even some spacers, etc, to try . |
Since I have your attention fora second don't forget the manilla folder, port thing. It will be good info for you and everyone.
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4487142)
A guy or two over at http://racingfuelsystems.myfunforum.org may know already. If not, by bore size, venturi size, base plate, and booster.
|
Pulled mesh out last year haha only have 2 layers you see right through
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4487156)
Just pull some mesh out. We only run with one layer of screen two tops. That's why you over insure you boat
:-) |
I hear ya on the carb thing, learning more since 2014 also.. I am much smarter now and educated and continue to learn, you know I will do what I can to
Maximize this time, without re inventing wheel ...I trust my buddy's ability to come up with cam specs per cylinder head flow and will address all that when that time comes...hoping to Dyno in Jan or so... With you and Ryan, if that happens I am gonna schedule a 3-4 day trip to really play with things more, last time was a "let's see what you have session" as you know lets see how it goes this time!!!
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4487157)
You might go from 73.2, to 73.3! :poopoo:
I pretty much suggested a dominator from the get go on this build. That thread was a whole nother chit show of arguing. You said no way, because you couldn't fit it. Now, you're willing to find room, to fit a spacer under your current carb, and worried your carb is too small?! lol :angry-smiley-038: I think this time around, you might be best to do your own engine development. What I mean is, taking advice from 30 different avenues, is not necessarily a bad thing, but at the end of the day, strapping the thing on a dyno, and trying out various carbs, various intakes, swapping exhaust, etc. Sometimes, what looks great on paper, doesn't always work. You know Ryan Retter is flexible with you, and will work with you to try different things on the dyno, and won't nickel and dime you for the time. Theres no point in cutting up your hatch, if its a 10hp gain. Now, if you find a particular intake/carb combo, that nets you 25, 35, 40+hp , you may want to modify the hatch. Same thing with exhaust. You might find 10hp from switching from your manifolds to a header setup, or you might find 50hp. That might sway you to looking into different exhaust, or keeping what you have. But, you gotta do the testing. What works on one guys engine, might not work on yours. BCK spent some time on fine tuning his intake/carb combo. He found what , like 25hp doing so? Thats not a bad gain at all. We have enough of us here, that I am sure someone would be willing to loan out an intake, a carb, maybe even some spacers, etc, to try . |
p92 !
|
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4487082)
That cam is too small. Need mid 250's on intake high 250's exhaust 109 lsa cam needs to go in 10 degrees advanced. Something along those line in mid 5xx" motors with 320range heads will be in the 725-750hp range a tic over 6,000 rpm's with compression in 9.5:1 range. They really make a bunch more torque if you put a dome piston in them around 10.3:1
This type of cam will revert h2o Interesting stuff. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4487162)
p92 !
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4487167)
So assuming cam has no advance ground into based on the duration numbers you mentioned to install at 10 deg advanced. I see where larger CI engines absorbs duration say for instance from a 454 to a 540 or larger. So with that said would it also be correct to say comparing to 572 builds with different stroke combos the longer stroke build would have lower peak hp rpm than that of the shorter stroke. But back to your original comment I'd guess with the duration you mentioned based on a 540 you'd be looking at approximately 7k peak rpm + or -? If advancing 1 deg = 100 rpm to bring it in around 6k.
Interesting stuff. |
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4487160)
Pulled mesh out last year haha only have 2 layers you see right through
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4487167)
So assuming cam has no advance ground into based on the duration numbers you mentioned to install at 10 deg advanced. I see where larger CI engines absorbs duration say for instance from a 454 to a 540 or larger. So with that said would it also be correct to say comparing to 572 builds with different stroke combos the longer stroke build would have lower peak hp rpm than that of the shorter stroke. But back to your original comment I'd guess with the duration you mentioned based on a 540 you'd be looking at approximately 7k peak rpm + or -? If advancing 1 deg = 100 rpm to bring it in around 6k.
Interesting stuff. |
Black Baja, what ever happened to the Grumpy heads I sold you a few years ago?
How come we haven't seen each other on the water yet? Or maybe we have and I didn't out 2&2 together? Where do you usually run too? |
Originally Posted by Panther
(Post 4487188)
Black Baja, what ever happened to the Grumpy heads I sold you a few years ago?
How come we haven't seen each other on the water yet? Or maybe we have and I didn't out 2&2 together? Where do you usually run too? |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4487107)
Wonder if that would put any stress on the lifter tie bars? know a few guys who broke some lifter tie bars with bobs cams. Never really thought about that. [/I]
Originally Posted by dunnitagain
(Post 4487093)
Oh hell yes it will break tie bars.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.