Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift... (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/341258-cam-valvetrain-longevity-low-duration-high-lift.html)

Black Baja 09-23-2016 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484549)
I'd be pretty thorough on the measurements, and certainly account for and measure piston rock. When I am putting together an engine, I measure the piston to deck height with a deck bridge and dial indicator after the shortblock is assembled. once those measurments are taken, THEN gaskets are ordered.

IMO, the benefits, do not outweigh the risks of playing with extremely tight quenches, on a bbc, unless you are building an all out competition engine. If the piston is at 0 deck, .027 is playing with fire, even with a steel rod. Staying in the .040-.060 range, is fine for a N/A build, and most forced induction builds.

I would imagine that Bob M, spec'd those gaskets, assuming the blocks were being zero decked. I don't know how anyone would know the specific blocks deck height, without physically measuring, if in fact, the block was anything other than zero deck. Unless they are virgin blocks from world products, but even then?

.027 with a 4.500 bore will hit even with the best designed piston on the market.

MILD THUNDER 09-23-2016 09:04 PM

Screw it. I was enjoying some evening coffee, but I think its time to switch gears, and break out the Makers 46. This thread deserves a toast.

SB 09-23-2016 09:04 PM

BB - I felt the quake up here. LOL.

SB 09-23-2016 09:08 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484552)
Screw it. I was enjoying some evening coffee, but I think its time to switch gears, and break out the Makers 46. This thread deserves a toast.

I'll take your coffee then. I may wanna stay up for a bit now.

MILD THUNDER 09-23-2016 09:15 PM


Originally Posted by SB (Post 4484555)
I'll take your coffee then. I may wanna stay up for a bit now.

Interestingly, I was drinking from an "Allstate Carbs" coffee mug I recieved free when ordering some carb parts last year.

Would it kill Bob to throw in a MK hat or koozy when ordering cams and heads? Maybe Tim would feel better about his situation if he had a hat to keep his head warm and beer cold. :party-smiley-004:

SB 09-23-2016 09:18 PM


Originally Posted by SB (Post 4484555)
I'll take your coffee then. I may wanna stay up for a bit now.

Scratch that. Drugs will be better now.

MILD THUNDER 09-23-2016 09:19 PM


Originally Posted by SB (Post 4484561)
Scratch that. Drugs will be better now.

:bong:

MILD THUNDER 09-23-2016 09:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by I.C.U.Lookin (Post 4484550)
Wouldn't be surprised. Most combos make more power when the madera cams are tossed.

:fear:

sutphen 30 09-23-2016 09:28 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484558)
Interestingly, I was drinking from an "Allstate Carbs" coffee mug I recieved free when ordering some carb parts last year.

Would it kill Bob to throw in a MK hat or koozy when ordering cams and heads? Maybe Tim would feel better about his situation if he had a hat to keep his head warm and beer cold. :party-smiley-004:

maybe a barf bag would be better.

MILD THUNDER 09-23-2016 09:37 PM

Lets not get off topic just yet. We havent hit 50 pages yet. :helmet:

I wonder what the science is, behind the fact, Timmys 540ci engines, with AFR 325 heads, got a 241/246 cam, and the tight quench guy, gets a 242/247 cam, with a little less lift? Both have flat top pistons, 4150 carbs, both heads milled to 114cc... Why the change?

phragle 09-23-2016 09:43 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484558)
Interestingly, I was drinking from an "Allstate Carbs" coffee mug I recieved free when ordering some carb parts last year.

Would it kill Bob to throw in a MK hat or koozy when ordering cams and heads? Maybe Tim would feel better about his situation if he had a hat to keep his head warm and beer cold. :party-smiley-004:

How can you say you have been there if you dont have the T Shirt???

MILD THUNDER 09-23-2016 09:45 PM


Originally Posted by phragle (Post 4484569)
How can you say you have been there if you dont have the T Shirt???

Exactly.

For christmas, I might get tim a Tee shirt with his dyno sheet printed on the back.

Full Force 09-24-2016 06:19 AM

I can say one thing, the cams that erson custom ground for my old engines moved this slug VERY well, the acceleration was WAY better from 4000-5500...

Originally Posted by Black Baja (Post 4484543)
Never gonna happen on Nickersons dyno. After the first pull he's going to tell him the cam is all wrong and he has a guy down the street that custom grinds his cams for $500. His custom cams are actually $250 Erson cams... It will make 100hp more on his dyno with the custom Erson shelf grind.


Full Force 09-24-2016 06:21 AM

yep, Ray assembled 4 corners and checked deck, the square decked block to .010 in the hole... then checked and verified again, we also did when degreeing cams..

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484549)
I'd be pretty thorough on the measurements, and certainly account for and measure piston rock. When I am putting together an engine, I measure the piston to deck height with a deck bridge and dial indicator after the shortblock is assembled. once those measurments are taken, THEN gaskets are ordered.

IMO, the benefits, do not outweigh the risks of playing with extremely tight quenches, on a bbc, unless you are building an all out competition engine. If the piston is at 0 deck, .027 is playing with fire, even with a steel rod. Staying in the .040-.060 range, is fine for a N/A build, and most forced induction builds.

I would imagine that Bob M, spec'd those gaskets, assuming the blocks were being zero decked. I don't know how anyone would know the specific blocks deck height, without physically measuring, if in fact, the block was anything other than zero deck. Unless they are virgin blocks from world products, but even then?


Full Force 09-24-2016 06:23 AM

I got some sweet labels on my lifters!!!! lol

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484558)
Interestingly, I was drinking from an "Allstate Carbs" coffee mug I recieved free when ordering some carb parts last year.

Would it kill Bob to throw in a MK hat or koozy when ordering cams and heads? Maybe Tim would feel better about his situation if he had a hat to keep his head warm and beer cold. :party-smiley-004:


Full Force 09-24-2016 06:25 AM

I wondered that myself... the things that make you go hmmmmm....

I have a feeling I was Bobs experiment that went bad, and he surely picked the wrong guy... the internet a-hole to expose him, after all the slack I get for it... I would do it again in a heartbeat...


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484568)
Lets not get off topic just yet. We havent hit 50 pages yet. :helmet:

I wonder what the science is, behind the fact, Timmys 540ci engines, with AFR 325 heads, got a 241/246 cam, and the tight quench guy, gets a 242/247 cam, with a little less lift? Both have flat top pistons, 4150 carbs, both heads milled to 114cc... Why the change?


Full Force 09-24-2016 06:26 AM

Lolololol 2XL.... I'm fat haha


Originally Posted by mild thunder (Post 4484571)
exactly.

For christmas, i might get tim a tee shirt with his dyno sheet printed on the back.


cigrocket 09-24-2016 06:26 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484558)
Interestingly, I was drinking from an "Allstate Carbs" coffee mug I recieved free when ordering some carb parts last year.

Would it kill Bob to throw in a MK hat or koozy when ordering cams and heads? Maybe Tim would feel better about his situation if he had a hat to keep his head warm and beer cold. :party-smiley-004:


You should be drinking out of the engine builders mug

Black Baja 09-24-2016 06:38 AM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4484610)
I can say one thing, the cams that erson custom ground for my old engines moved this slug VERY well, the acceleration was WAY better from 4000-5500...

I would expect it to with a bigger arm spinning around. Acceleration gets better and better the bigger the crank even with junk heads on the motor. I kept same heads went from 4.5 stroke to 4.75 stroke and difference was night and day. 4.75 felt like a blower was added. Added 30* of duration to the cam with the bigger stroke.

Full Force 09-24-2016 06:44 AM

ya guess so, the only the dude did right that built them old engines was get parts that worked together very well...

Originally Posted by Black Baja (Post 4484617)
I would expect it to with a bigger arm spinning around. Acceleration gets better and better the bigger the crank even with junk heads on the motor. I kept same heads went from 4.5 stroke to 4.75 stroke and difference was night and day. 4.75 felt like a blower was added. Added 30* of duration to the cam with the bigger stroke.


articfriends 09-24-2016 08:31 AM


Originally Posted by jsand117 (Post 4484532)
like I said, I will post for sure where the final comp. ended up, think the pistons were 10 in the hole but will verify exact numbers. motors still with the builder.

I assembled my blown 540 in 2012 with zero decked Pistons that were between 0 and
003 in the hole , .039- .041
0 head gaskets with .0065 wall and they touched hot enough to knock the ring seal out of the tightest one's but not physically damaged the piston but gimmefuel ran .027 head gaskets with a motor close to zero and it beat the Pistons right out of it, this isnt nascar, if they dont hit hot at first they will when they get some carbon, fwiw, Smitty

fbc25el 09-24-2016 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by jsand117 (Post 4484522)
I am a few weeks away from my 540's being finished. similar to Tim, Bob M. spec the cams and heads. afr 325 114 cc the cams are 242.2 664 on intake 247.1 656 on exhaust flat top JE pistons, merlin 3 blocks zero deck and the head gasket he set me up with from cometic is .027. I am running Nickerson 4150 on merlin single plane intakes. carbs flow 994 CFM. as soon as the engines are complete they are going to Nickerson for dyno and tune. I will be happy to provide the results here. I can find out from my builder what the final comp. ended up, our target was 9.8 :1. will post more info as I get it.

You have almost the same set up as mine except I have a 1050 dominator from Nickerson. He is going to tell you the cam is too big! My advice is to learn how to tune it for your self.

MILD THUNDER 09-24-2016 02:09 PM


Originally Posted by rmbuilder (Post 3831388)
Tom,
The compression ratio will increase from 8.52 to 8.69 with the move to a .027” gasket from a .039”. That is an increase of .17 of a point and while that may seem insignificant, any increase is worthwhile at that low of a ratio. A .035” piston to head clearance is ideal in a sub 6000 RPM engine with a steel connecting rod. I would advise you to check the RA of both deck surfaces to verify the finish is compatible with a MLS gasket.

Bob

Maybe his "ideal" clearance. I wouldn't run that.

As stated, this isnt nascar.

jdf4068 09-24-2016 02:49 PM

I can here a big boom coming

Full Force 09-24-2016 04:44 PM

Damn, for a second I thought Bob replied lol


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484709)
Maybe his "ideal" clearance. I wouldn't run that.

As stated, this isnt nascar.


getrdunn 09-24-2016 04:50 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484568)
Lets not get off topic just yet. We havent hit 50 pages yet. :helmet:

I wonder what the science is, behind the fact, Timmys 540ci engines, with AFR 325 heads, got a 241/246 cam, and the tight quench guy, gets a 242/247 cam, with a little less lift? Both have flat top pistons, 4150 carbs, both heads milled to 114cc... Why the change?

So close but... Why the difference? Curious if valve timing is same or the different as well. Regardless this will be very interesting to see the outcome. Wonder if it will be dressed with marine exhaust or dyno headers. I will step up SB's number. 681.

Full Force 09-24-2016 05:19 PM

I say.... 674hp 640tq

Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 4484727)
So close but... Why the difference? Curious if valve timing is same or the different as well. Regardless this will be very interesting to see the outcome. Wonder if it will be dressed with marine exhaust or dyno headers. I will step up SB's number. 681.


SB 09-24-2016 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 4484727)
S I will step up SB's number. 681.

My brain dyno is the most stingy I've been too.:lolhit:

jsand117 09-24-2016 09:10 PM

what kind of power did you make with the dominator? what intake did you use? was intake matched to heads?

fbc25el 09-25-2016 08:41 AM

Did not dyno the engine. Wilson manifold matched & ported the manifold to the heads. 28 pitch prop 1.5 gears pulls strong a little past 6000 RPM. 25' cat.

getrdunn 09-25-2016 11:00 AM


Originally Posted by fbc25el (Post 4484859)
Did not dyno the engine. Wilson manifold matched & ported the manifold to the heads. 28 pitch prop 1.5 gears pulls strong a little past 6000 RPM. 25' cat.

Was that a shelf cam or a custom grind? Also what duration?

sutphen 30 09-25-2016 11:10 AM


Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 4484916)
Was that a shelf cam or a custom grind? Also what duration?

small light cat really doesn't apply to us resin bucket vee's when it comes to spinning a prop.

fbc25el 09-25-2016 11:43 AM


Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 4484916)
Was that a shelf cam or a custom grind? Also what duration?

.663-.655 dur. at .050in 246* ex 250* 112 lc. custom

getrdunn 09-25-2016 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by fbc25el (Post 4484925)
.663-.655 dur. at .050in 246* ex 250* 112 lc. custom

Perfect

Full Force 09-25-2016 01:00 PM

Yes can't compare a light boat to mine.. Dyno results yes... Boat no

MILD THUNDER 09-25-2016 01:38 PM

Question.

Seems like the Victor JR gets specd on all these builds. Also seems like, on almost every one of them, adding spacers show gains.

With that being said, why is the "super victor" intake ruled out as an option?

endeavor1 09-25-2016 02:22 PM

I know we made several pulls and a 1 inch Spacer was what it liked on my Vic Jr. We tried none, stacking, etc and found nothing but losses. I can see what you're saying though as the Victor has a larger 4500 flange. Could run their spacer/adapter to go to a 4150 anyway


I have the pulls labeled when we tried diff spacers. When I get home I'll see about posting up the differences

Black Baja 09-25-2016 02:36 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4484948)
Question.

Seems like the Victor JR gets specd on all these builds. Also seems like, on almost every one of them, adding spacers show gains.

With that being said, why is the "super victor" intake ruled out as an option?

I would use a Dominator intake and put a 4150 carb on it.

Black Baja 09-25-2016 02:37 PM


Originally Posted by endeavor1 (Post 4484955)
I know we made several pulls and a 1 inch Spacer was what it liked on my Vic Jr. We tried none, stacking, etc and found nothing but losses. I can see what you're saying though as the Victor has a larger 4500 flange. Could run their spacer/adapter to go to a 4150 anyway


I have the pulls labeled when we tried diff spacers. When I get home I'll see about posting up the differences

Dominator intake has a lot more plenum volume...

getrdunn 09-25-2016 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by Black Baja (Post 4484958)
Dominator intake has a lot more plenum volume...

Have u tried that sv565 that you recommended to me for 565 builds?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.