![]() |
Tim, while your lobe's finish looks like crap, it also looks like your lifters got some good hang time as well.
When you page thru master lobe listings, whether from crane cams, comp cams, etc, lobe designs can be engine specific. Granted, they can custom make you about anything you want, but I'm talking about application specific. Some cams are designed for LS engines, some for small blocks, some for fords, some for big blocks, some for big block drag race, big block marine, big block circle track, big block towing, so on and so forth.. I know you run rev limiters, and I know you havent spent much time over 5400-5500rpm. I see no reason the lifters should have been losing contact with the lobe. AFR's hyd roller springs you have, if I recall, come in around 200-500 lb range. If a hyd roller needs more spring than that to be stable and keep the lifter on that cam at 5500rpm, I'd say, that cam is a pile of chit. Question. Does anyone know, if these 680 lift cam designs, on such a short lobe, are proven big block chevy cam designs? Being honest, I'd like to know what kind of R&D goes into Bob Maderas cams. I know everyone gets a Metric bolt, stepped nose, LS firing order camshaft lately from Bob. Supposedly, there was an abundance of leftover 8.1L cores on the market or some crap like that. I also know, Cam motion, is very heavy into the LS engines. |
I'd send some of those pictures to someone who actually grinds cams and deals with various core materials and what not on a daily basis. I do know, that like any heat treated/hardened surface, there is a limit to how much material you could grind away, before hurting the durability of the finish.
|
Tim do both cams look like that?
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4486801)
I'm defensive, upset, bummed, and just sick of this whole mess... Just done. And very tempted to drive to Rochester.....
|
I'm thankful Bob sucked at returning emails.
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4486814)
Tim, while your lobe's finish looks like crap, it also looks like your lifters got some good hang time as well.
When you page thru master lobe listings, whether from crane cams, comp cams, etc, lobe designs can be engine specific. Granted, they can custom make you about anything you want, but I'm talking about application specific. Some cams are designed for LS engines, some for small blocks, some for fords, some for big blocks, some for big block drag race, big block marine, big block circle track, big block towing, so on and so forth.. I know you run rev limiters, and I know you havent spent much time over 5400-5500rpm. I see no reason the lifters should have been losing contact with the lobe. AFR's hyd roller springs you have, if I recall, come in around 200-500 lb range. If a hyd roller needs more spring than that to be stable and keep the lifter on that cam at 5500rpm, I'd say, that cam is a pile of chit. Question. Does anyone know, if these 680 lift cam designs, on such a short lobe, are proven big block chevy cam designs? Being honest, I'd like to know what kind of R&D goes into Bob Maderas cams. I know everyone gets a Metric bolt, stepped nose, LS firing order camshaft lately from Bob. Supposedly, there was an abundance of leftover 8.1L cores on the market or some crap like that. I also know, Cam motion, is very heavy into the LS engines. |
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4486827)
Joe, we run the Comp high energy/magnum high lift lobes. Never any valve train issues and they make great power. Chris Padgett is the guy to talk to.
|
Originally Posted by Panther
(Post 4486660)
Not sticking up for him but when I've worked with him on combo's he has always asked me what parts I use, especially exhaust. We've reviewed combos for intake restricted engines and exhaust restricted systems. In a recent build, the exhaust was scrapped because the larger cam wouldn't have benefited from the small exhaust.
Maybe the limitations were reviewed, maybe not. I wasn't on the call when it was spec'd. :-) |
Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
(Post 4486863)
Well when I worked with Bob he COMPLETELY FORGOT to calculate my exhaust into the build until the engines were finished, then explained that I needed new big tube headers to get the results he promised. F*** Bob and his cat!
|
He's got 572's big difference lol
Originally Posted by endeavor1
(Post 4486864)
If Tim is starting over as it seems once again, he should try and copy your build. Sounds nasty and seems to run pretty well
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.