another cam thread
#41
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Mike, Found this. Relative build to what you have going on. 454 with AFR 265's and crane hyd roller
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/crane-cams-dyno/
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/crane-cams-dyno/
#42
I bought a set of flat tappet crower edms for a Pontiac a few years ago and one of them looked like bottom was finished with a 36 grit air sander and I think one was missing edm hole, their QC inspector has to be blind and retarded.
#43
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 3
From: Spicewood, Texas USA
Hey Mike, I did a Mk IV 454 jet boat engine a few years ago with the 741, AFR 325 cnc chamber heads, single plane intake,9:1 compression and 850 carb. It pulled a solid 600 HP at 6000 RPM on the dyno(didn't pull it past 6000). So I would think you would be just about the same.
Bob
com
[QUOTE=mike tkach;4524876]after doing some research i decided to go with a crane 168741 cam.in this small 462 cu in engine i think it will pull hard to 6400 or so and still have more low end grunt than the car can use]
Bob
com
[QUOTE=mike tkach;4524876]after doing some research i decided to go with a crane 168741 cam.in this small 462 cu in engine i think it will pull hard to 6400 or so and still have more low end grunt than the car can use]
#46
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
#49
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 3
From: Spicewood, Texas USA
Figured you'd have that question...LOL Remember a jet boat only has about a 1000 rpm operating range at WOT, so low end doesn't matter at all. It was also about availability at the time. I personally don't think a smaller head would have made more HP, but definitely a much better torque curve. I sure hope to see a dyno run with those 265 heads though!
Bob
Bob


