Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Retarding cam - help reversion? >

Retarding cam - help reversion?

Notices

Retarding cam - help reversion?

Old 11-08-2017 | 03:24 PM
  #21  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Just wanted to make note I'm not certain timing events are the same for gen VI cam 169651 as one listed above. One above is 139651 non step nose. I would imagine they are but...
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 05:39 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
Been around for many years but stil a great cam and I bet would work well with your current build / heads. I'm not sure what your plan is to do but thought I'd post the cam card anyway.
That would be a good cam for his application if it wont revert.
still is going to have to prop the boat for 4800-5000 rpm.
And both the numbers have the exact same timing events just one is a step nose and the other is not.
Warship2k15 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 06:15 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
Default

sent you a pm
Warship2k15 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 06:23 PM
  #24  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
Just wanted to make note I'm not certain timing events are the same for gen VI cam 169651 as one listed above. One above is 139651 non step nose. I would imagine they are but...
same cam except for nose.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 06:57 PM
  #25  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Warship2k15
That would be a good cam for his application if it wont revert.
still is going to have to prop the boat for 4800-5000 rpm.
And both the numbers have the exact same timing events just one is a step nose and the other is not.
651 should pull peak 5,700-5,800 easily in a 540.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 07:12 PM
  #26  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
same cam except for nose.
I assumed they were but you know what assumption can be remember? The mother of all fk ups. Mike you've used the 651 in several builds. What's typical peak hp in a 540 +/-? Also is there known reversion issues with wet exhaust. I wouldn't think it would but I'm not certain as I've never used it.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 07:16 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Warship2k15
That would be a good cam for his application if it wont revert.
still is going to have to prop the boat for 4800-5000 rpm.
And both the numbers have the exact same timing events just one is a step nose and the other is not.
Originally Posted by getrdunn
I assumed they were but you know what assumption can be remember? The mother of all fk ups. Mike you've used the 651 in several builds. What's typical peak hp in a 540 +/-? Also is there known reversion issues with wet exhaust. I wouldn't think it would but I'm not certain as I've never used it.
Better yet Mike whats the torque difference between 5000 and 5700.and please take into consideration the 088 heads and wet exhaust.
And yes please educate us on if it will revert.
Warship2k15 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 07:18 PM
  #28  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

i never used a 651 in a n/a engine but in my blown 548s if i remember correctly they peaked around 6400 rpm.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 07:22 PM
  #29  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

i think the torque curve was pretty flat,they made good torque from 4000 on up.i am to lazy to go to the shop to look at the dyno sheets,also i was not worried about reversion due to dry exhaust.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 07:50 PM
  #30  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

You don't prop to peak torque if that's what your refeering to... well you can but will be a total turd.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.