Retarding cam - help reversion?
#22
Registered
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
still is going to have to prop the boat for 4800-5000 rpm.
And both the numbers have the exact same timing events just one is a step nose and the other is not.
#24
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
#25
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
That would be a good cam for his application if it wont revert.
still is going to have to prop the boat for 4800-5000 rpm.
And both the numbers have the exact same timing events just one is a step nose and the other is not.
still is going to have to prop the boat for 4800-5000 rpm.
And both the numbers have the exact same timing events just one is a step nose and the other is not.
#26
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
I assumed they were but you know what assumption can be remember? The mother of all fk ups. Mike you've used the 651 in several builds. What's typical peak hp in a 540 +/-? Also is there known reversion issues with wet exhaust. I wouldn't think it would but I'm not certain as I've never used it.
#27
Registered
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
I assumed they were but you know what assumption can be remember? The mother of all fk ups. Mike you've used the 651 in several builds. What's typical peak hp in a 540 +/-? Also is there known reversion issues with wet exhaust. I wouldn't think it would but I'm not certain as I've never used it.
And yes please educate us on if it will revert.


