Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
HP estimates on a 598 I'm having built ? >

HP estimates on a 598 I'm having built ?

Notices

HP estimates on a 598 I'm having built ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-10-2024 | 10:15 AM
  #41  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
Dyno headers I assume? What was your correction factor?
Originally Posted by bencini231
Was this full acessories and dry dyno headers or wet headers? Also ask previously asked, what was the correction factor?
This was typical dyno rigging.... dyno headers, no accessories, etc... I know it'll be reduced with all the boat accy and exhaust, but this is more than what I was expecting for the build being dyno'd this way. Might need to adjust the tune some to match the rigging once complete but thats easy enough. I do NOT know the correction factor yet as the info I got was just over the phone since I could not be there, and I don't have the sheets yet, but I'll ask next time I talk to them.

cdaniel525 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2024 | 11:36 AM
  #42  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Default

That`s a real happy dyno.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2024 | 11:53 AM
  #43  
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 797
From: Central IL
Default

Brule and Freiburger be like, "Say what?!"
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2024 | 01:44 PM
  #44  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
That`s a real happy dyno.
Funny, Ive heard their dyno is soft on #s... supposedly another well known Long Island builder has their motors come off their dyno and to this builders and ran with zero changes with #s coming in as much as 10% lower... But whatever, well see how she runs in the boat compared to the old 632, thats all that matters to me! lol Much better flowing heads and bigger solid cam, should be as good if not stronger over all.....I hope
cdaniel525 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2024 | 11:34 PM
  #45  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Default

Not sure why I went with blowers when I can make close to the same power N/A

Good luck.


Last edited by ICDEDPPL; 01-11-2024 at 12:02 AM.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2024 | 04:37 AM
  #46  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
Not sure why I went with blowers when I can make close to the same power N/A

Good luck.
For TORQUE and LOTS of it!
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2024 | 05:10 AM
  #47  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
It's really hard to make that kind of N/A marine power.

Even harder to make it reliable for 100-200hrs in offshore poker run conditions.

Almost impossible to make the boat run comparable to similar forced induction power.

Especially with a build on this budget.

Still badass and I hope you have fun, and guess the time to freshen them before they break. Thanks for sharing.
"Solid lifter, custom grind cam; 272/280 @ .050 --- .756/.756 lift --- 114 LSA"
Will be interesting how long the valve train holds up with his cam. Going from good dyno headers to his E tops with a radical cam will be a governor or this too. I believe his hp numbers, the tq is kinda surprising for that much cam and only 10-1 compression. When I brought up my dyno sim from originally simming this when I read this thread, I had simmed it with 2 1/4 headers, 90% efficient, 34" primarys, 10" collectors, no mufflers. I still had it on my sim, recalculated it at 1.875 primary, 15" tubes, 20" collectors, 2000 cfm muffler for any restriction any water in exhaust presents and it whacks 80 hp off peak and dies 300 rpms earlier, and about 40 hp from the ideal number with no muffler. These deals get real touchy on exhaust changes from ideal to real world , Smitty
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2024 | 09:43 AM
  #48  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Default

You can only pick one:
1. Max effort N/A
2. Endurance engine

If it makes it to 50hrs come back and you can prove me wrong.

Last edited by ICDEDPPL; 01-11-2024 at 09:59 AM.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2024 | 09:59 AM
  #49  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by articfriends
For TORQUE and LOTS of it!
Apparently not .
This was a long time ago combo but still a 540ci with 8#s of boost.
at 6100rpm I`m making the same TQ as an N/A engine on a "soft" dyno so he`s probably making more TQ than a 540 with a 10-71.





ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2024 | 10:40 AM
  #50  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 1,815
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

To the guys that have dyno's on here.

The guy I use, we Dyno we the exhaust that will go on the boat, the sea water pump, circulating pump (if there is one), power steering looped back, alternator, flame arrestor etc.

Granted no water in exhaust but most are dry anyway.

Why do the hero run setups?
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.