This is the cam that got ordered for these engines, is the 114 lobe seperation too much or should it be 112? and as far as the lifts @ .050 is there more spread than whats needed for the AFR 335 heads -- and what influence would it make? The overall lift looks a little low too? or am I making too much out of it??

Here are the cam specs....
Duration @ .050 240/247
Lobe sep. 114 Int. centerline 110
Lift .618/.629


Please any feedback will be greatly appreciated!!!!!

Cam looks fine the spread is not to bad ..
The AFR heads are unreal

Are they done yet Dave?

Not yet

This is the cam that got ordered for these engines, is the 114 lobe seperation too much or should it be 112? and as far as the lifts @ .050 is there more spread than whats needed for the AFR 335 heads -- and what influence would it make? The overall lift looks a little low too? or am I making too much out of it??

Here are the cam specs....
Duration @ .050 240/247
Lobe sep. 114 Int. centerline 110
Lift .618/.629

This cam is now in the engines, AFR has sent the heads --but possibly with the wrong springs for a hydraulic roller cam --above-- is 250 lbs seat pressure too much ?? The builder has changed 1 set to 125 lbs closed and about 320 lbs fully open, does this sound right???

The last thing I want to do is break/float a valve --max rpm will be 5200-5300.


Any insight would be great --- we want to dyno on saturday!!

I'm thinking that your engine would gain from a better exhaust system. You need something that is more like a true header with some good long primaries.

Cord you're probably right! It sucks that i just bought those last year for my 461's--- i didn't think i was going to be going into this kinda ci right away. They'll have to work for now -- I just blew the wad on the motors.

I just did a bunch of searching and found that the 130# seat pressure should be alright from what I've read.

I believe the 1050 Holley is a 4500, not a 4150.
Do they make a 1050 cfm 4150?