Interior Picts
#32
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Pick one with.
1. the ability to get in and dump without tools.
2. the ability to backflush with a screw in hose connection.
UD
#33
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
#34
Registered
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Chatham.Ontario
I like the idea of dumping the strainer without tools.
I was thinking of building a little box in my engine compartment to hold a few tools belts and some oil.
I was thinking if I went the blower route that I would do a 383.
But I think if I built a good 427 sb I would probably get to as fast as i would want.
Are blowers really bad on fuel?
I was thinking of building a little box in my engine compartment to hold a few tools belts and some oil.
I was thinking if I went the blower route that I would do a 383.
But I think if I built a good 427 sb I would probably get to as fast as i would want.
Are blowers really bad on fuel?
#36
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Usually it does.
This stops the kelp, moss, grass, from choking the sea pump, and keeps this trash out of your coolers.....
Ive seen poeple do ALL KINDS of weird stuff though......
UD
This stops the kelp, moss, grass, from choking the sea pump, and keeps this trash out of your coolers.....
Ive seen poeple do ALL KINDS of weird stuff though......
UD
Last edited by Uncle Dave; 01-01-2010 at 04:59 PM. Reason: spelling
#37
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
500HP of energy takes x amount of fuel no matter how you deliver it.
Blowers have some parasitic loss for sure.
Whipples are really good as far as adiabatic efficiency compared to roots type blowers.
UD
Blowers have some parasitic loss for sure.
Whipples are really good as far as adiabatic efficiency compared to roots type blowers.
UD
Last edited by Uncle Dave; 01-01-2010 at 04:54 PM. Reason: spelling, detail
#39
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1


