Any real first hand knowledge of Ecoboost
#301
Registered
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
well I don't know what the issue was with your Duramax, but have driven both and it ain't even close between towing power of a duramax and ecoboost, not saying the ecoboost is crap...but if the 2 were close you had a serious issue...
#302
+1. I was impressed with the Eco-Boost but it was not in the same category towing-wise as my DMax.
#303
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
an ECO boost is no diesel. But IMO is better than the big gassers and has relatively the same power as late 90s early 2000s diesels. I had a 6.0 and 6.4 powerstroke and the diesel had more power and they werent close but I wouldnt go as far as saying there is no comparison either.
#305
Ive always had diesels..and nothing compares to the low end torque that they deliver. I have now a Eco boost and do tow 10500 with it..she impresses me very much. Better torque in the midrange where needed vs the 5.0 litre 360/385 as the other option. Both great Gas motors, just prefer the eco slightly better. Good luck.
#306
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Ive always had diesels..and nothing compares to the low end torque that they deliver. I have now a Eco boost and do tow 10500 with it..she impresses me very much. Better torque in the midrange where needed vs the 5.0 litre 360/385 as the other option. Both great Gas motors, just prefer the eco slightly better. Good luck.
#307
the majority of the tq starts at 15-1600rpms on the diesels. Cummins has a new tranny coming out for the 13's and the numbers are in.. 385/850..just cant remember if it started at 1600 rpms. The eco pulls hard..great torque curve, its better than I ever thought a 1/2 ton could pull.
#308
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
the majority of the tq starts at 15-1600rpms on the diesels. Cummins has a new tranny coming out for the 13's and the numbers are in.. 385/850..just cant remember if it started at 1600 rpms. The eco pulls hard..great torque curve, its better than I ever thought a 1/2 ton could pull.
#309
Registered
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 1
Don't forget the 6.2L 411HP/434TQ.
The 6.2L's 434TQ isn't until 4500RPM so the Eco's 420TQ at 2500RPM is without a doubt much more tow friendly though.
My 6.2 gets around 18-18.5MPG @ 65MPH flat roads 1-300FT from sea level. That drops to 7-8MPG on the same roads with my 37 LOA (on trailer) 8500LBS boat behind me. Glad I only tow around 50 miles a year!
The 6.2L's 434TQ isn't until 4500RPM so the Eco's 420TQ at 2500RPM is without a doubt much more tow friendly though.
My 6.2 gets around 18-18.5MPG @ 65MPH flat roads 1-300FT from sea level. That drops to 7-8MPG on the same roads with my 37 LOA (on trailer) 8500LBS boat behind me. Glad I only tow around 50 miles a year!
#310
Registered

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 3
From: Lake Travis ,Texas
If they would put the same turbo setups on the big cube gassers they would pull just as hard as the diesels,they just wouldnt last half a million miles but see very few people on here keep their trucks that long so I dont think that would matter..
The V6 is getting roughly 100hp/100ftlbs tq per liter..
Put that on the 6.2l and your talking 600hp/600ftlb tq...
The V6 is getting roughly 100hp/100ftlbs tq per liter..
Put that on the 6.2l and your talking 600hp/600ftlb tq...


