Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > Trucks, Trailers and Transportation
Any real first hand knowledge of Ecoboost >

Any real first hand knowledge of Ecoboost

Notices

Any real first hand knowledge of Ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-02-2012 | 01:59 PM
  #301  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Default

well I don't know what the issue was with your Duramax, but have driven both and it ain't even close between towing power of a duramax and ecoboost, not saying the ecoboost is crap...but if the 2 were close you had a serious issue...
ezstriper is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-2012 | 03:55 PM
  #302  
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 797
From: Central IL
Default

Originally Posted by ezstriper
well I don't know what the issue was with your Duramax, but have driven both and it ain't even close between towing power of a duramax and ecoboost, not saying the ecoboost is crap...but if the 2 were close you had a serious issue...
+1. I was impressed with the Eco-Boost but it was not in the same category towing-wise as my DMax.
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-2012 | 06:40 AM
  #303  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

an ECO boost is no diesel. But IMO is better than the big gassers and has relatively the same power as late 90s early 2000s diesels. I had a 6.0 and 6.4 powerstroke and the diesel had more power and they werent close but I wouldnt go as far as saying there is no comparison either.
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-2012 | 07:18 AM
  #304  
JasonSmith's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 5
From: USA
Default

I had an 04 LLY Duramax. Power delivery, with the EB is smoother & of course, it is much quieter.
Sorry for the confusion. The EB is not more powerful than the Duramax.
JasonSmith is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-2012 | 08:59 AM
  #305  
Jassman's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,398
Likes: 33
Default

Ive always had diesels..and nothing compares to the low end torque that they deliver. I have now a Eco boost and do tow 10500 with it..she impresses me very much. Better torque in the midrange where needed vs the 5.0 litre 360/385 as the other option. Both great Gas motors, just prefer the eco slightly better. Good luck.
Jassman is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-2012 | 09:11 AM
  #306  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

Originally Posted by Jassman
Ive always had diesels..and nothing compares to the low end torque that they deliver. I have now a Eco boost and do tow 10500 with it..she impresses me very much. Better torque in the midrange where needed vs the 5.0 litre 360/385 as the other option. Both great Gas motors, just prefer the eco slightly better. Good luck.
whats the torque curve on theses diesels. Because I know the eco gives you all of the 420lbs at 2500rpm. I wondering what the diesel gives you. I would imagine its got to be pretty good as a diesel only goes up to 4k rpm anyways and has 650-750lbs of torque.
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-04-2012 | 07:16 PM
  #307  
Jassman's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,398
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
whats the torque curve on theses diesels. Because I know the eco gives you all of the 420lbs at 2500rpm. I wondering what the diesel gives you. I would imagine its got to be pretty good as a diesel only goes up to 4k rpm anyways and has 650-750lbs of torque.
the majority of the tq starts at 15-1600rpms on the diesels. Cummins has a new tranny coming out for the 13's and the numbers are in.. 385/850..just cant remember if it started at 1600 rpms. The eco pulls hard..great torque curve, its better than I ever thought a 1/2 ton could pull.
Jassman is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2012 | 06:36 AM
  #308  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

Originally Posted by Jassman
the majority of the tq starts at 15-1600rpms on the diesels. Cummins has a new tranny coming out for the 13's and the numbers are in.. 385/850..just cant remember if it started at 1600 rpms. The eco pulls hard..great torque curve, its better than I ever thought a 1/2 ton could pull.
Im curios to see what the second gen of these will be and if other makers counter. I would like to see a little better MPG and about 400hp with 500 torque, if thats possible. Combined a strong payload of about 3k 3500lbs. I would see no reason to go back to diesel if something like this was available.
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2012 | 08:58 AM
  #309  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Jassman
vs the 5.0 litre 360/385 as the other option.
Don't forget the 6.2L 411HP/434TQ.

The 6.2L's 434TQ isn't until 4500RPM so the Eco's 420TQ at 2500RPM is without a doubt much more tow friendly though.

My 6.2 gets around 18-18.5MPG @ 65MPH flat roads 1-300FT from sea level. That drops to 7-8MPG on the same roads with my 37 LOA (on trailer) 8500LBS boat behind me. Glad I only tow around 50 miles a year!
marylandmark is offline  
Reply
Old 10-05-2012 | 09:56 AM
  #310  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 3
From: Lake Travis ,Texas
Default

If they would put the same turbo setups on the big cube gassers they would pull just as hard as the diesels,they just wouldnt last half a million miles but see very few people on here keep their trucks that long so I dont think that would matter..
The V6 is getting roughly 100hp/100ftlbs tq per liter..
Put that on the 6.2l and your talking 600hp/600ftlb tq...
HTRDLNCN is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.