New Chevy Silverado for 2014
#21
Registered
Did I miss any tech in my prior post? Its great tech- its just two model years late.
What do you mean FI car motor? Or do you mean TT/DI/4VDOHC "car motor" (actually they are engines not motors)
Does that imply the vette has a "truck" engine?
I love my Chevies, but Ford beat Chevy to punch almost all the headline grabbing stuff direct injection , variable cam phasing, electric steering, and a 6 speed box.
Ford gives you a 4 valve DOHC top end with twin turbos- with a forged rotating assembly and side bolted mains.
Chevy has the active fuel management which looks really slick we'll see how it holds up as its been tried before, but I think they'll get it right.
Uncle Dave
What do you mean FI car motor? Or do you mean TT/DI/4VDOHC "car motor" (actually they are engines not motors)
Does that imply the vette has a "truck" engine?
I love my Chevies, but Ford beat Chevy to punch almost all the headline grabbing stuff direct injection , variable cam phasing, electric steering, and a 6 speed box.
Ford gives you a 4 valve DOHC top end with twin turbos- with a forged rotating assembly and side bolted mains.
Chevy has the active fuel management which looks really slick we'll see how it holds up as its been tried before, but I think they'll get it right.
Uncle Dave
The 8 Speed is development, it wont be ready at the trucks launch.
#22
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
fixx
Gotcha!...ok lets wait until the ecoboost and the chebby engines reach over 100 k and we can go from their.. i see a whole lot of fords with problems from ford at that mileage then chebby..
to be continued!
to be continued!
#23
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
fixx
Actually GM could make anything they collectively decided to.
They just didn't. They chose to massage what they had incrementally. This is why I said they didnt go far enough.
The 5.3 isnt even close to the EB
The 6.2 is very nice but I dont think it will make 400lb ft at 1900RPM at 4000ft in 100+ degree heat like the EB will.
maybe it will- well all see soon enough.
Id have rather seen a 4.3 TT with deactivation- THAT would have been new.
I tow in Arizona a lot and the heat combined with altitude annihilate NA vehicles.
Watch the EB tow my boat on the parker climb out up the hill in 100+ degree heat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfCEO6ipltA
UD
They just didn't. They chose to massage what they had incrementally. This is why I said they didnt go far enough.
The 5.3 isnt even close to the EB
The 6.2 is very nice but I dont think it will make 400lb ft at 1900RPM at 4000ft in 100+ degree heat like the EB will.
maybe it will- well all see soon enough.
Id have rather seen a 4.3 TT with deactivation- THAT would have been new.
I tow in Arizona a lot and the heat combined with altitude annihilate NA vehicles.
Watch the EB tow my boat on the parker climb out up the hill in 100+ degree heat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfCEO6ipltA
UD
let me know when you on the road nextme so i can avoid that highway..
#24
Registered
Not sure talking and holding a 2 inch square box (that doesn't have an eyepiece) is really all that difficult considering a cell phone is harder to hold on too if you have ever done that in your life or maybe smoked a cigarette or coke while towing on a relatively straight uphill road.
- but thats ok- Ill make sure you aren't anywhere near me or my group next time I do it.
I could have pulled this off with no danger in a stick shift truck- what a wuss guys are these days.
UD
#25
Registered
Is it new or not?
Dodges 8 speed is in the new Hemi truck and their 6 cyl truck. apparently good for 500+ lb ft of torque.
UD
#26
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: St. Louis/ LOTO
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, we also have a 2013 F150 with the 5.0 and love it so far.
#27
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did I miss any tech in my prior post? Its great tech- its just two model years late.
What do you mean FI car motor? Or do you mean TT/DI/4VDOHC "car motor" (actually they are engines not motors)
Does that imply the vette has a "truck" engine?
I love my Chevies, but Ford beat Chevy to punch almost all the headline grabbing stuff direct injection , variable cam phasing, electric steering, and a 6 speed box.
Ford gives you a 4 valve DOHC top end with twin turbos- with a forged rotating assembly and side bolted mains.
Chevy has the active fuel management which looks really slick we'll see how it holds up as its been tried before, but I think they'll get it right.
Uncle Dave
What do you mean FI car motor? Or do you mean TT/DI/4VDOHC "car motor" (actually they are engines not motors)
Does that imply the vette has a "truck" engine?
I love my Chevies, but Ford beat Chevy to punch almost all the headline grabbing stuff direct injection , variable cam phasing, electric steering, and a 6 speed box.
Ford gives you a 4 valve DOHC top end with twin turbos- with a forged rotating assembly and side bolted mains.
Chevy has the active fuel management which looks really slick we'll see how it holds up as its been tried before, but I think they'll get it right.
Uncle Dave
The AFM has been around, but was instituted rather conservatively in gen IV due to NVH and some other problems. I'd expect it to return much better efficiency in this implementation.
Yes, the ecoboost is a car "engine" (pedantic much?). Time will tell how it handles duty cycles of a truck. I guess Ford's strong history of bulletproof truck motors should give people confidence.
#28
Registered
#29
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
kind of dissapointed in the unveil. Truck looks nice and chevy finally updated the interior to look like it belongs in the 2000s. But in the end the truck looks like a refinement more than anything. They are saying these engines are new, but really theres nothing new to them. I was hoping they would provide an EB option and or a small diesel option in the half ton.
GM has not put performance numbers out yet, but they did leak that their 5.3 will have 350hp, wow good job chevy way to put out an engine that has less power than your competitors. To me it just looks like they made there new truck to compete with whats out there and not surpass anything that is on the market.
GM has not put performance numbers out yet, but they did leak that their 5.3 will have 350hp, wow good job chevy way to put out an engine that has less power than your competitors. To me it just looks like they made there new truck to compete with whats out there and not surpass anything that is on the market.
#30
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Go read on the LT1 or gen V if you want all the tech details.
The AFM has been around, but was instituted rather conservatively in gen IV due to NVH and some other problems. I'd expect it to return much better efficiency in this implementation.
Yes, the ecoboost is a car "engine" (pedantic much?). Time will tell how it handles duty cycles of a truck. I guess Ford's strong history of bulletproof truck motors should give people confidence.
The AFM has been around, but was instituted rather conservatively in gen IV due to NVH and some other problems. I'd expect it to return much better efficiency in this implementation.
Yes, the ecoboost is a car "engine" (pedantic much?). Time will tell how it handles duty cycles of a truck. I guess Ford's strong history of bulletproof truck motors should give people confidence.