Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Are cats really that dangerous? >

Are cats really that dangerous?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Are cats really that dangerous?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-06-2008 | 12:26 AM
  #101  
terryandalexa's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
Nice!
Dude! Your amazing Nort... where do you come up with this stuff...
That's gotta be a Prouty Vid ..
terryandalexa is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 06:11 AM
  #102  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
I spoke to an insurance person regarding Cat insurance, and he said it is about three times higher than a V of the same speed. He said claims were more expensive for the cats because the accidents were more severe with more property damage and injuries.

I think anyone driving a cat who is interested in safely operating it, should have a healthy dose of respect for it. Those making blanket statements about cats being safer than V's probably don't have that respect.

Michael
I don't recall it being said not to respect the speeds a cat can run .. where's that coming from?

Last edited by stainless; 05-06-2008 at 06:13 AM.
stainless is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 06:55 AM
  #103  
Airpacker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 3
From: Aurora Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Speedpro1
You need to have alot respect for the water with a cat. I have seen people turn too sharp and hook them and throw everyone out of the boat.

And V's don't hook and throw everyone out of the boat if turned to sharply?
Airpacker is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 08:14 AM
  #104  
T2x's Avatar
T2x
Allergic to Nonsense
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 21
From: Granite Quarry, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
I spoke to an insurance person regarding Cat insurance, and he said it is about three times higher than a V of the same speed.
Michael
So this "insurance person" is saying that a cat accident at 80 mph will have 3 times the damage than a vee accident at 80 mph? Unless the cat is made in some God awful place like California....that's horsefeathers. But it does raise a good point...There have been some terrible Cat designs that bow steer, or are tragically overpowered...or both....made in the land of fruits and nuts that might be the cause of a lot of this insurance issue. I wonder, if you broke down these accidents by manufacturer and length, would the data make more sense?

T2x

Last edited by T2x; 05-06-2008 at 11:57 AM.
T2x is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 08:26 AM
  #105  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook, Tx
Default

When you say cats can handle the rough stuff and I am talking above 3-4 footers, what length boat are you talking about? I have run with 36' and smaller cats and they tend to run slow in the rougher water and then blow by us in the calm. I have seen the 39' and above run very well in rough water. Would that be about the right size for a true rough water cat? What brands tend to run better in the rough? Different V hulls have better rough water characteristics based on brand. Cigs and Apaches seem to be the brand of choice for V's. My Fountain handles all that I am comfortable throwing at it. Seems to me size matters in V's or Cats when you talk about rough water.
gerritm is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 08:28 AM
  #106  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Default

Originally Posted by rbhudelson
Chicago 2007 - about 115.
Nice Delson Like a bird in flight
RunninHotRacing163.1 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 09:59 AM
  #107  
BLee's Avatar
Charter Mod
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,551
Likes: 3
From: E Dock
Default

I had a fuse blow at 110 when I first got the Skater, thus killing the power to that side. It just settled down and came off plane. Here's me and Bruce Bullock trying to figure out which fuse it was.
Attached Thumbnails Are cats really that dangerous?-pic-029.jpg  
BLee is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 10:04 AM
  #108  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gerritm
When you say cats can handle the rough stuff and I am talking above 3-4 footers, what length boat are you talking about? I have run with 36' and smaller cats and they tend to run slow in the rougher water and then blow by us in the calm. I have seen the 39' and above run very well in rough water. Would that be about the right size for a true rough water cat? What brands tend to run better in the rough? Different V hulls have better rough water characteristics based on brand. Cigs and Apaches seem to be the brand of choice for V's. My Fountain handles all that I am comfortable throwing at it. Seems to me size matters in V's or Cats when you talk about rough water.
as mentioned i've run a 28 skater in 10' conditions. was it fun ? Not so much. a 36-40 cat (skater mti doug wright etc.) can run just about any conditions much depends on the skill of the driver/ throttleman as far as comfort goes
stainless is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 11:55 AM
  #109  
T2x's Avatar
T2x
Allergic to Nonsense
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 21
From: Granite Quarry, NC
Default

Originally Posted by gerritm
When you say cats can handle the rough stuff and I am talking above 3-4 footers, what length boat are you talking about? I have run with 36' and smaller cats and they tend to run slow in the rougher water and then blow by us in the calm. I have seen the 39' and above run very well in rough water. Would that be about the right size for a true rough water cat? What brands tend to run better in the rough? Different V hulls have better rough water characteristics based on brand. Cigs and Apaches seem to be the brand of choice for V's. My Fountain handles all that I am comfortable throwing at it. Seems to me size matters in V's or Cats when you talk about rough water.

A 30' Shadow/ Chris Cat would run with a 36' Cigarette in any conditions that were legal to race in, and I would imagine that a high deck 30 or 32 foot Skater would do the same. A 40' naturally aspirated, Skater got the best of a 46' triple supercharged engined, Apache in the Ocean city race mentioned earlier. ( a race in which the Coast Guard almost closed the inlet because it was so rough)

So yes size does matter...in reverse...but , of course neither of these cat designs were from the Left Coast.

T2x
T2x is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2008 | 12:31 PM
  #110  
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 5
Default

I've had a Chris Cat and agree with Rich about them; the Jag is even better in the rough. But, I'm not knocking Skaters: they are fantastic!

Due

Last edited by Dueclaws; 05-06-2008 at 12:52 PM.
Dueclaws is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.