Originally Posted by Top Banana (Post 3514484)

With all due respect......for the first year, we set a date. We were contacted and asked if we wouldmove that date, because it conflicted with a race date that had already been planned and scheduled.

We moved the date per the request. As the time got closer, guess what...the other organization changed their pre scheduled date to the same date we had.

This year, we set the date very early as we are doing again....so everyone would know the date and perhaps consider it, when they scheduled their own and secondly, to allow any European teams runnng in Cowes, to be able to do Cowes and have time to ship over for this race.

Guess what.....the other organization set their race date on the same date we did...... and no Europeans showed up.

So once again with all due respect, this is our date....Sept 22, 2012, we have an endurance event that takes a different boat than the shore racing does. Everyone is welcome, but we are over moving our date to try to satisfy anyone else.

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514469)

For the past two years Billy and Charlie have contacted OPA in advance to find an open date.......

Both years the date was later scheduled by OPA.........

I wonder if a vibrant NPBA/HORBA event is really complimentary to OPA's business plan? If a bunch of OPA guys get a taste for unrestricted ocean racing....does that bode well for GPS circle racing? Personally I would discourage NPBA from having a joint sanction if the GPS speed rules are included in a 200 plus mile race where you might cross the finish line first only to be penalized because you "broke out".

Bottom line the conflict with OPA race dates is not NPBA/Horba's fault....... and I wonder if you could get a "guaranteed" open date from your leadership? It hasn't worked so far...and I don't believe in coincidences.

Originally Posted by Indy (Post 3514404)

Then you're the fringe of the fringe. Not a bad thing but your not addressing the previous point of the popularity of the sport.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514359)

thats true. point well taken. maybe the lack of races is the reason why boaters have no interest? personally i would be interested in one, if the course were shorter (50-80 miles). something like newport to CT River or Prov to BI. Also the boats would have to be seperated into classes. A 30' boat competing against 40'+ is hardly fair. just my 0.02

Originally Posted by fast fun 2 (Post 3514542)

GPS racing may not be as rugged as the old school racing is (Just ask My father :) ) but its also not as expensive. Its the only way people like my father and I can go racing. It works for us.

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514636)

This is Exactly

T2x

P.S...... I'm Back!

Originally Posted by SS930 (Post 3514683)

Who said dinosaurs and cavemen were extinct??? Welcome back Rich... ;)

BTW, they need to get your azz out there announcing the live coverage next year.

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514642)

You and your dad were born for this race...... and you know you can afford to enter this event, Miami-Bimini, and one other...... if and when it occurs. Heck..... the King Sting team will probably want in as well......

We missed you this year........ but at least you went precisely 74.8 mph for a while... :p

T2x

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514359)

thats true. point well taken. maybe the lack of races is the reason why boaters have no interest? personally i would be interested in one, if the course were shorter (50-80 miles). something like newport to CT River or Prov to BI. Also the boats would have to be seperated into classes. A 30' boat competing against 40'+ is hardly fair. just my 0.02

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514636)

T2x

P.S...... I'm Back!

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514692)

What live coverage? I want to announce from the cockpit of one of the boats.... I'm sure I can narrate and throttle at the same time.....

"The current is strong here in the lower East River....I think we just sheered a "floater" in half...... Watch out for the plywood scoffoldings behind the next wave...... Did someone jump off the 59th Street Bridge?.....Look at all the condoms in our roostertail!.... and now back to Dick Crippen at race headquarters!"

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514692)

What live coverage? I want to announce from the cockpit of one of the boats.... I'm sure I can narrate and throttle at the same time.....

"The current is strong here in the lower East River....I think we just sheered a "floater" in half...... Watch out for the plywood scoffoldings behind the next wave...... Did someone jump off the 59th Street Bridge?.....Look at all the condoms in our roostertail!....Are those Crips on the Brooklyn shoreline shooting at us?...... and now back to Dick Crippen at race headquarters!"

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 3514755)

still there's no poker runners showing up despite they having their own class for it. I have once managed to overspeak a guy with a week old 35 Fountain to participate.., still he told he'd never driven that long at 10/10ths before.. all in all 56 mins.

In an endurance race anything can happen so I'd never be worried about someone's other stuff.

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514636)

This is Exactly why there is limited interest in racing today......not the frequency of events, but the policy of catering to weekend warriors who "need" a boatload of rules, classes, course limits, comfort, convenience and a slew of other things that run contrary to the very core of long haul, no holds barred, endurance/marathon racing. A marathon is just that... a marathon...not a mini marathon...not a segmented marathon.. and certainly not 8 or 9 (GPS or non GPS) controlled laps on a 5 mile course in a bay or lake.....nor a "speed run" at some bar.

Your needs are precisely what begat Poker Runs and Shootouts, which are not events that real racers or real racing fans get excited about....yet I respect the need for such venues. Pretty girls in bikinis, oysters and drinks, showing off your big shiny motors, pulling up in your Lambo....I get it! On the other hand real racers are competitive in a more primal way and want very few "accomodations" beyond the opportunity to compete, especially when pitting themselves against other opponents and mother nature simultaneously. We built 30 foot cats that outran vee bottoms 6 to 10 feet longer in very rough seas over hundreds of miles and never worried about what was "fair" (of course the vee bottom builders used that word a lot..but that's another story :D)...and..... we could party with the best of them....AFTER the race (and sometimes after we had the sutures put in).

As to the earlier comments from another poster about older racers not being able to handle the "tight cornering" in today's races..... I submit that many of us "geezers" ran multiple closed course boat races in boats ranging from outboard hydros to twin engine vees, to tunnel boats, to inboard flat bottoms and hydros at speeds and in close quarters that would crimp your sphincter...as well as Offshore events. (I raced most of those...some, like Billy Sirois and Odell Lewis, did it all). Get back to me after you've run 9 hours on a 4 mile course in and out of Miami Marine stadium against 150+ boats, or 8 hours at Havasu or the Parker 9 hour...etc, etc. Further, your comment about "turning at 150 mph" is nonsense....Today's cats may peak out at 200 (occasionally...rarely in a race) but they turn at the same limits as anything else..... well south of your estimate. As far as a 70 MPH turn in a big vee bottom... that really "ain't no thang" other than to put a hull designed for rough water straightaways in the wrong environment, while encouraging a large group of clueless wannabes to emulate you and decorate the waterways with their hapless passengers as they spin out in their stepped bottom glamour boats.

At the core of this debate is the significant difference between today's racing and racers and the older, rougher, nastier version(s) that formed the foundation of the sport. Those who lived and raced in the days of big fleets and 150+ mile courses in big seas have a lot to contribute and might know more than you give us credit for. You see, at the end of the day, we have the benefit of seeing and experiencing the current model against the a background of the original version, but folks who can't listen and learn from the past very rarely have much of value to say. Of course that doen't mean they don't talk alot. ;)

T2x

P.S...... I'm Back!

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514806)

Mikey...I agree 100%.... even though I don't understand 50% of what the h*ll you're saying.

:D

Originally Posted by scarabman (Post 3514819)

Well we have races like that.. and still there's no poker runners showing up despite they having their own class for it. I have once managed to overspeak a guy with a week old 35 Fountain to participate..and he has had several powerboats before that, and we won overall easily, still he told he'd never driven that long at 10/10ths before.. all in all 56 mins.

In an endurance race anything can happen so I'd never be worried about someone's other stuff.

I was thinking some of these same things when I saw his comments. He wants gifts, he wants his ego stroked, he wants equality in the name of giving himself a better chance of winning. It is a MARATHON. He who prepare best and keeps his equipment together the whole time has just as good a chance of winning as the POTENTIALLY faster boat.

Should the NYC Marathon be broken up into classes of runners by height and leg length?

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514875)

Theoretically the only way to win is to be the fastest around the island without breaking, right? Taking this into account, the only way for me to win (fastech) would be to hope the entire field does not finish. Simple right...Not so much. Without crunching numbers, I would venture a guess that the chances of everyone breaking down is in the area of 3-5%. That is being generous. Its simple math.
.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514875)

There is a reason why nascar has the stringent rules they do for engine size, etc. Because speed matters!!!!

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 3514883)

Theoretically you count only one variable of thousands that affects the outcome. Therefore the Theory of relativity doesn't IMO never stand in racing.

At the last LI race 1/3rd finished so chances are good anyone could've won... usually it's the 2cent part that lets you down.
Don't ask how I know...

I Agree on the need for classes... Free for all is one and keeps the sport enjoyable.

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 3514889)

No, it's because some legislator still thinks speed kills.... which is totally wrong, the sudden stop kills you.
Regarding their stringent rules well Nascar nowadays is a running joke. I've never seen a Toyota V8 2d sedan on the showroom floor...and Hopefully I do not have to either.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514893)

At that point its not racing. Its wishing and hoping upon a star!!! Whats the word for it...Oh yea, "LUCK".

Pretty lame in my book.

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 3514903)

You forgot that with skill comes luck.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514899)

An equal/level playing field has nothing to do with speed. Rules and regulations across the sport is what makes a race a "fair". Again, the reason why rules are set in place.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514905)

So you have the skill to turn my little fastech into a 100 mph boat? anyways, I am far off topic. sorry.

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 3514913)

Yes.. but for how long ?

Do you want it filled with TNT or Nitroglycerin ;) ?

Agree we are off topic and differ in our views.

But try a race before giving up that's all I can say to you.. you might get hooked.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514924)

Its not giving up. Its simple math. If someone doesn't understand it, they should open a textbook.

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 3514934)

We'd be all speaking Russian/Chinese if we'd think like that...I'm Finished ;)

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514939)

:confused: ...

Originally Posted by JCPERF (Post 3515034)

I would have to say that it doesnt matter what you bring to this event.I had Joe Sgro at my shop today and i asked him every question in the book about doing this event.If you have big power you will use more fuel and might have to make a fuel stop.He said that Joes OL was the perfect boat for this race.It didnt have to stop for fuel,It got great fuel mileage[1.1 MPG]and was totally reliable.If you brought a big Skater Blower entry you would need a fuel stop and you have the reliabilty factor.Both Joes did this event with not even thinking they would break the record.It did happen though.They wanted to be first back.

Originally Posted by Here's Johnny (Post 3514987)

I would have to agree with having classes......and then of course you will always have the overall winner.......it would make it that much more appealing to enter the race knowing I have a good shot at winning my class and also that "you never know" long shot of winning the overall.......I am sure with the organizers having a mandatory date to be registered will give a much clearer picture of what the race will look like ahead of time and then implement some sort of classes......just a guess though, I could be wrong.....

Originally Posted by Matt Trulio (Post 3515164)

Having to divide the fleet into classes is what my friends in the business world call "a high-class problem." Given the limited interest so far and the various "equalizers" inherent in such a run, I don't see a need for it. Yet.

Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2 (Post 3514875)

If you dont understand my argument for classes then you simply dont understand math...

Seeing as though the organizers want this event to expand, i think everyone does...including myself, lets look at an example to counter your argument:

Without getting into statistics, lets say 20 boats enter a race. Lets say 10 (37'-42') OL's with big power reaching speeds in excess of 100 mph, 5 (36'-42') skaters again with big power, 4 (35'-43) donzis with moderate power still reaching 90mph and 1 Fastech 292 with small blocks top speed of 70 mph.

Theoretically the only way to win is to be the fastest around the island without breaking, right? Taking this into account, the only way for me to win (fastech) would be to hope the entire field does not finish (breaks). Reason being, i cant reach the speeds of competitors (no way for me to catch them). Simple right...Not so much. Without crunching numbers, I would venture a guess that the chances of everyone breaking down is in the area of 3-5%. That is being generous. Its simple math. The more participants the less of a chance of winning. But this is greatly influenced by the inability to reach the speeds of fellow participants.

I dont want to downplay what Joe did last year in his Sonic because it was brilliant but he only raced against 2 other boats. As a result it increased the statistical chances of winning dramatically. My guess is that this will not be the case in the future, especially with the addition of competitors having bigger/badder boats. Hope everyone understood that.

Thats why i think there is a need for classes. Especially if these races grow in size. There is a reason why nascar has the stringent rules they do for engine size, etc. Because speed matters!!!! Put everyone on an equal playing field.

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514636)

This is Exactly why there is limited interest in racing today......not the frequency of events, but the policy of catering to weekend warriors who "need" a boatload of rules, classes, course limits, comfort, convenience and a slew of other things that run contrary to the very core of long haul, no holds barred, endurance/marathon racing. A marathon is just that... a marathon...not a mini marathon...not a segmented marathon.. and certainly not 8 or 9 (GPS or non GPS) controlled laps on a 5 mile course in a bay or lake.....nor a "speed run" at some bar.

Your needs are precisely what begat Poker Runs and Shootouts, which are not events that real racers or real racing fans get excited about....yet I respect the need for such venues. Pretty girls in bikinis, oysters and drinks, showing off your big shiny motors, pulling up in your Lambo....I get it! On the other hand real racers are competitive in a more primal way and want very few "accomodations" beyond the opportunity to compete, especially when pitting themselves against other opponents and mother nature simultaneously. We built 30 foot cats that outran vee bottoms 6 to 10 feet longer in very rough seas over hundreds of miles and never worried about what was "fair" (of course the vee bottom builders used that word a lot..but that's another story :D)...and..... we could party with the best of them....AFTER the race (and sometimes after we had the sutures put in).

As to the earlier comments from another poster about older racers not being able to handle the "tight cornering" in today's races..... I submit that many of us "geezers" ran multiple closed course boat races in boats ranging from outboard hydros to twin engine vees, to tunnel boats, to inboard flat bottoms and hydros at speeds and in close quarters that would crimp your sphincter...as well as Offshore events. (I raced most of those...some, like Billy Sirois and Odell Lewis, did it all). Get back to me after you've run 9 hours on a 4 mile course in and out of Miami Marine stadium against 150+ boats, or 8 hours at Havasu or the Parker 9 hour...etc, etc. Further, your comment about "turning at 150 mph" is nonsense....Today's cats may peak out at 200 (occasionally...rarely in a race) but they turn at the same limits as anything else..... well south of your estimate. As far as a 70 MPH turn in a big vee bottom... that really "ain't no thang" other than to put a hull designed for rough water straightaways in the wrong environment, while encouraging a large group of clueless wannabes to emulate you and decorate the waterways with their hapless passengers as they spin out in their stepped bottom glamour boats.

Within the compass of this letter, I can do no more than indicate, as concisely as I can, relevant considerations that must be taken into account if we are to discuss Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's bestial, self-satisfied ipse dixits in a rational manner. First, the misinformation: Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing suggests that the moon is made of green cheese. Where the heck did it come up with that? I hardly know. But I will stake the immortality of my soul that I was entirely gobsmacked the first time I saw Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing hurting people's feelings. Since then, I've seen it do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing and I are as different as chalk and cheese. It, for instance, wants to desecrate religious objects. I, on the other hand, want to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. That's why I need to tell you that it's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of Bulverism and you'll see a loathsome, baleful sod hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of neocolonialism in a petulant attempt to peddle fake fears to the public. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that before Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing initiated an obscurantism flap to help promote its laughable, crafty remonstrations, people everywhere were expected to begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see an organization as inherently huffy or inherently disingenuous. Alas, Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing is doing all it can to provide us with unmistakable proof that it is inherently both. For instance, Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing wants nothing less than to twist the teaching of history to suit its grotty purposes. Its secret agents then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with doctrinaire, illaudable wiseacres who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that the main dissensus between me and Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing is that I believe that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's conclusions are cuckoo to the core. It, on the other hand, contends that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep.

Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing has brainwashed a large number of people into believing that it's a moral exemplar. Alas, we can't change people's minds overnight, and we can't instantly and totally dispel the delusions implanted by Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's lewd lies, but we can penetrate the sunny façade of Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's nostrums with the sharpened stick of reality. That might help a few brainwashees see that when Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing stated that it has achieved sainthood, I concluded that it was thoroughly brutish. …

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514636)

…Now that it claims that everyone who fails to think and act in strict accordance with its requirements is a lawless jabberer, I claim that it's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing never stops boasting about its generous contributions to charitable causes. As far as I can tell, however, its claimed magnanimousness is utterly chimerical, and, furthermore, all of Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's peons are thieves—idle, envious, and ready to plunder and enslave their weaker neighbors. It's therefore not surprising that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing used to maintain that it does the things it does "for the children". When it realized that no one was falling for that claptrap, it quickly changed its tune to say that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing is indubitably a litigious liar, and shame on anyone who believes it. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing keeps talking about the importance of its cause. As far as I can tell, its "cause" is to ransack people's homes. It deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that its cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love it for promoting it. In reality, Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's clumsy flacks exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation for no better reason than to be above someone on the social ladder. It's that simple.
While some of Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's refrains are very attractive on the surface and are undeniably entertaining, they ultimately serve to eviscerate every bit of social progress of the past century. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing is not just testy. It is unbelievably, astronomically testy. Can you believe that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing once said that its brownshirt brigade is looking out for our best interests? I have a collection of similar pearls from Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing, but rather than recite them all I'll simply point out that I once had a nightmare in which Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing was free to stand in the way of progress. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider it to be a weapon of mass destruction itself.
Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's adulators are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing, who wants nothing less than to destroy the lives of good, honest people. In this land which has befriended base-minded lumpenproletariats, Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing has conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted, and corrupted, and—hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of unstable election-year also-rans—dares to contrive and scheme the death of every principle that has protected it. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing is often accused of defiling the air and water in the name of profit. Its flunkies usually respond with a message along the lines of, "So what? At least Closed Circuit "Offshore' Racing isn't killing the messenger and controlling the message." I suppose there's an argument to be made for that, but aren't we forgetting that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing sees life as a repulsive game without any rules?
Although I decidedly reject Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's demands, it is also true that irreligionism is correctly defined by its moonstruck style, structure, and methods, not by its stated or apparent ideological premises or goals. This is a perverse paradox, the implications of which are too namby-pamby to dwell on short of saying that it's obviously astounding that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing has somehow found a way to work the words "counterestablishment" and "pseudoconglomeration" into its threats. However, you may find it even more astounding that the real question here is not, "What in tarnation was it thinking when it said that sending children to die as martyrs for causes that it is unwilling to die for itself is essential for the safety and welfare of the public?". The real question is rather, "Does its oversized ego demand that it sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need?" My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that even its most nettlesome goombahs are trained in the use of force, deadly force, advanced weaponry, and offensive and defensive tactics. The second, more telling, observation is that when people see slatternly lackwits behaving like slatternly lackwits they begin to realize that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing will fail if we unite. Of that I am certain because purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's irrational perorations. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how I admit that I'm not perfect. I admit that I may have been a bit pharisaical when I stated that as sure as a bear does you-know-what in the woods, Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing will hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty by the next full moon. Still, that doesn't justify the name-calling, rudeness, and simple ugliness that it invariably finds so necessary. Nor does it justify Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's denying the legitimacy of those who speak out against revolting yo-yos.
How many of Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's satraps are content to sit around doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the world around them? I'd hazard to guess that the number is pretty high. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's habitués have tried repeatedly to assure me that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing will eventually tire of its plan to usher in the beginning of a domineering new era of Maoism and will then step aside and let us discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. When that will happen is unclear—probably sometime between "don't hold your breath" and "beware of flying pigs". …

Originally Posted by T2x (Post 3514636)

…Some critics have called Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing sinful. A handful insist it's jackbooted. Its gofers, on the other hand, consider it to be one of the great minds of this century. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing once heard an appalling upstart say, "Mediocrity is a worthwhile goal." What's amazing is that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing was then able to use that quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince its loyalists that it is clean and bright and pure inside, which clearly makes me wonder, "What exactly is its point?" Well, I asked the question so I should answer it. Let me start by saying that only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that you can hear the crwth's fremescent clangor every time it tries to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that its mealymouthed gang is a respected civil-rights organization, then there is unmistakably no hope for you.
Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing wants to ensure that there can never in the future be accord, unity, or a common, agreed-upon destiny among the citizens of this once-great nation. But what if the tables were turned? How would Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing like that? I indeed hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing does any real damage. Or is it already too late? After days of agonized pondering and reflection I finally came to the conclusion that some of Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's former operatives say they were willing to help Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing unleash an unparalleled wave of negativism because Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing convinced them that they were part of a historic mission to save the world from a nasty global conspiracy—a belief they now reject as disorganized. Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing may mean well, but unless we maintain the great principles of virtue, truth, right, and honor, no real changes will ever occur. But there's the rub; I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's benighted positions, but it doesn't simply want people to believe that it can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. It wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. It wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing truly be able to get away with dumping effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers.
The cry of "bigot" is raised mostly by bigots. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to it. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing may irritate an incredible number of people when you least expect it, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to champion the force of goodness against the greed of the most sniffish serpents I've ever seen, we must expand people's understanding of its ill-natured, unforgiving expositions. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing has warned us that in the immediate years ahead, inaniloquent astrologers will take the focus off the real issues. If you think about it, you'll realize that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing has, at times, called me "inerudite" or "meddlesome". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to destroy the heart and fabric of our nation.
I was once asked, "What exactly is the principle that rationalizes Closed Circuit "Offshore' Racing's insensate, combative editorials?". I'm not quite sure how to answer such a question. The problem is that if Closed Circuit 'Offshore" Racing is victorious in its quest to advocate its philosophies amid a hue and cry as unmannerly as it is violent, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Let me end this letter by challenging my readers to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence. Are you with me, or with the forces of solecism and oppression?

At the core of this debate is the significant difference between today's racing and racers and the older, rougher, nastier version(s) that formed the foundation of the sport. Those who lived and raced in the days of big fleets and 150+ mile courses in big seas have a lot to contribute and might know more than you give us credit for. You see, at the end of the day, we have the benefit of seeing and experiencing the current model against the background of the original version, but folks who can't listen and learn from the past very rarely have much of value to say. Of course that doen't mean they don't talk alot. ;)

T2x

P.S...... I'm Back!