Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Drive questions Teague/Imco/Bmax >

Drive questions Teague/Imco/Bmax

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Drive questions Teague/Imco/Bmax

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-13-2012 | 02:39 PM
  #31  
4195's Avatar
Thread Starter
Can You Hear Me Now??
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 102
From: Old Saybrook CT
Default

Originally Posted by A.O. Razor
Just to do a little math. My guess is that your boat was about 81-82 mph with the 2 x 675 hp motors so you would see about a 5-6 mph increase going to 800 hp. Now the SCX or Konrad ect. will probably scrub 2+ mph off that, so it'll leave you at 86 at best. The interesting thing is, that the ASD#7M will most likely put you at atleast 94+.
It is a twin step boat and the boat ran low 90's with the 675's. I may have to detune the motors to 750hp. and go easy on it. Here is a boat with decent power that ran good with XR's http://www.lipship.com/used_boats/view/37
4195 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2012 | 04:39 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 1
From: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
Default

Originally Posted by 4195
It is a twin step boat and the boat ran low 90's with the 675's. I may have to detune the motors to 750hp. and go easy on it. Here is a boat with decent power that ran good with XR's http://www.lipship.com/used_boats/view/37
Sweet. I missed the T/S
The boat you show is a 38 though. Quite a diff in terms of how hard the drives are loaded and balance. I still say you will be 5-10 mph better off with the ASDs and the reliability is second to none. You also get the rooster

With a speed of say 92 running xrs and 675 hp the 800 hps and Konrads or SCXs will put you at 98ish at best. and 750 hps around 96ish.
A.O. Razor is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2012 | 04:41 PM
  #33  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,315
Likes: 1,557
From: Maryland
Default

The scx and the sc lower should be fine for it, that way it will be the same depth maybe even a quarter inch deeper. the imco upper and helmet are bigger than an xr so it moves it back about an inch. if you go with the scx lower it comes standard -2 then you can space down as needed. also you can send the scx lower to wilson and have it blue printed. MDG here in MD did an scx/sc swap on a twin step and it ran fine, just like before, believe it had bumped up 575's. I will be going imco when the time comes to add whipples or turbos to my tiger.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2012 | 04:45 PM
  #34  
C_Spray's Avatar
Diamond Member #001
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 5
From: Coastal North Carolina
Default

How about a set of Ilmor Indy drives/transmissions? They are listing a used set (factory demo boat) for $52,000 on their web site. http://www.ilmormarine.com/, then "Store", then "Clearance Engines". Teague is selling an 825 hp package with these drives, so you should be fine.
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
C_Spray is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2012 | 05:41 PM
  #35  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Default

I second the Indy idea! They look amazing, will probably net you a few mph over any bravo setup, and its always nice to be one of the first.
Waveform is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2012 | 07:57 PM
  #36  
JIMKID Motorsports's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 7
From: Livonia Mi Usa
Default

Put on x power no brainer
JIMKID Motorsports is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2012 | 08:01 PM
  #37  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 375
From: Traverse City MI
Default

Originally Posted by JIMKID Motorsports
Put on x power no brainer
well if money is no object......

But yeah, your boat with X-power drives is AWESOME.

Hopefully see you at boyne again this year
offshorexcursion is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2012 | 08:21 AM
  #38  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
Default

X Power is a awesome set up! Just got to write the check.
Cobra100+ is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2012 | 08:46 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 999
Likes: 1
From: Chattanooga
Default

Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
The scx and the sc lower should be fine for it, that way it will be the same depth maybe even a quarter inch deeper. the imco upper and helmet are bigger than an xr so it moves it back about an inch. if you go with the scx lower it comes standard -2 then you can space down as needed. also you can send the scx lower to wilson and have it blue printed. MDG here in MD did an scx/sc swap on a twin step and it ran fine, just like before, believe it had bumped up 575's. I will be going imco when the time comes to add whipples or turbos to my tiger.
Can someone tell me why noone goes with the SCT lower as apposed to the SCX lower? Both are rated for 900 HP but the SCT has a better hydrodynamic design, right?
TCBoss302 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2012 | 11:15 PM
  #40  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

This is a perfect application for the Arneson #7M's. Speed increase, stability increase and reliability!!
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.