Notices
General Boating Discussion

AT vs. OL

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-29-2014 | 07:43 AM
  #221  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 376
From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by pm203
I don't think that the OL would meet Jeff's quality standards. He is pretty fussy with fit and finish.
It's funny you say that because it is something that has been brought to my attention a lot lately from some people who know the boating industry pretty well. These people feel that the product OL is pushing out the door today, isn't the same product they were making in the early 2000's in regards to fit and finish.
302Sport is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 08:18 AM
  #222  
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood, IN
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
If/when I move up my current choices would be between a 37 OL Stilleto, 37 AT and possibly a TS Gun.
The 39 OL is out of my budget or it would be included as one of my possibilities as well..
Griff, I made this move a year ago out of my 28' checkmate and this was my list of choices. We like to stay overnight on the boat and all of these were capable of that. This thread was an interesting one to follow, (hard at times), but I agreed with Brett M. a few pages back when he stated this comparison would have been better for the two 37's (AT vs. Stiletto). There were a few options and deals out there at the time that lead me to my purchase. We love it!
TJIndy280 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 08:31 AM
  #223  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,973
Likes: 6,467
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
I came across this water repellent bottom on Facebook:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]517297[/ATTACH]

What happened to the back of the hull?? You guys forgot to finish it!!
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:16 AM
  #224  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,210
Likes: 1,604
From: Worldwide
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
To summarize what this thread has taught me;

1. The 36 OL looks like a Baja
2. The AT performs like a Baja
3. Be brand loyal regardless of what the facts are, just cheerlead and bash the other guy.
Strange as this may sound, I'd change one word, to make the post accurate:
...replace performs with handles.
(The "performance" aspect applies when one compares 15 year old boats; but not modern examples.)

You can actually turn a DDC AT like a straight bottom boat (offshore/at speed/flat water) without going swimming.
(Notice, I didn't say trim it like a straight bottom.)


Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
What happened to the back of the hull?? You guys forgot to finish it!!
I would not expect a guy with a flat deck and a flat bottom to understand.





And one last thought...
Define: fit and finish as it pertains to these boats, and how it's been referred to in this thread.
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:22 AM
  #225  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 376
From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
And one last thought...
Define: fit and finish as it pertains to these boats, and how it's been referred to in this thread.
http://www.boattest.com/resources/vi...px?NewsID=1008
302Sport is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:25 AM
  #226  
Wobble's Avatar
SORE MEMBER
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,984
Likes: 2
From: 29°50'49.74"N 95° 5'17.55"W.......TEXAS
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz

I would not expect a guy with a flat deck and a flat bottom to understand.





.
That's getting very personal
Wobble is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:26 AM
  #227  
SS930's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 3
From: At the office.
Default

Another agreement, the best OL comparison to the 37 AT would without a doubt be the 37 OL. The 37 OL in the std side by side engine configuration is VERY similar, or at least as close as you're going to get when comparing an OL to a 37 AT. Both are very similar in cockpit layout, cabin amenities, single step hull (minus the few quad steps), and speed with similar power... although the 37 OL was offered in a staggered SSM 6 configuration, which is kind of in another league from a performance and drive reliability standpoint.
SS930 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:33 AM
  #228  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Where does the Hustler 41 Razor fit into this? I see it also has the intimate bolster, a microwave, and a jazzy sex room.
Attached Thumbnails AT vs. OL-razor.jpg   AT vs. OL-razorbilge.jpg   AT vs. OL-razorcabin.jpg  

AT vs. OL-razorgalley.jpg   AT vs. OL-razorcockpit.jpg  
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:36 AM
  #229  
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 797
From: Central IL
Default

If you've spent any time in the AT forum, they would have you thinking the thread title should have been "AT vs. Chuck Norris".
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:48 AM
  #230  
sommerfliesby's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 10
From: Frankfort, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me
If you've spent any time in the AT forum, they would have you thinking the thread title should have been "AT vs. Chuck Norris".
What kind of boat DID Chuck Norris drive? And did it have outdrives, or did he just extend his legs out the back and kick?

Last edited by sommerfliesby; 01-29-2014 at 11:09 AM.
sommerfliesby is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.