|
6 Attachment(s)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]528270[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]528271[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]528272[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]528273[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]528274[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]528275[/ATTACH]
|
Number 3 and 4 bearing spun, all others and mains so far look good I don't think it was starving for oil, unless those cylinders known for it but I never read that, I am leaning towards bolt or machining issue maybe? Not sure gonna tear down I hope the rest tomorrow...
|
You gonna fix that POS or just keep typing on the computer?
J/K, I drove by Friday after the gym, but I didn't stop cause you weren't outside. I'll call next time. |
What crankshaft was in this? Looking at the edge wear in picture 4 I wonder if an H bearing should have been used and a P bearing was used. Hard to tell from the pictures but I see a couple of bearings with heavy edge wear by the chamfer.
|
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4177541)
You gonna fix that POS or just keep typing on the computer?
J/K, I drove by Friday after the gym, but I didn't stop cause you weren't outside. I'll call next time. |
Originally Posted by donzi matt
(Post 4177546)
What crankshaft was in this? Looking at the edge wear in picture 4 I wonder if an H bearing should have been used and a P bearing was used. Hard to tell from the pictures but I see a couple of bearings with heavy edge wear by the chamfer.
|
Originally Posted by donzi matt
(Post 4177546)
What crankshaft was in this? Looking at the edge wear in picture 4 I wonder if an H bearing should have been used and a P bearing was used. Hard to tell from the pictures but I see a couple of bearings with heavy edge wear by the chamfer.
|
Originally Posted by donzi matt
(Post 4177546)
What crankshaft was in this? Looking at the edge wear in picture 4 I wonder if an H bearing should have been used and a P bearing was used. Hard to tell from the pictures but I see a couple of bearings with heavy edge wear by the chamfer.
http://www.pbm-erson.com/store.php?catId=806&parent=801 |
If they are P bearings then assembly error is clearly to blame. I can't imagine the motor even turned easily with a socket and rod side clearance would have been next to nothing, but I will bet it was never checked. It will be interesting to see if you have the same results on the other motor.
|
Bearing stamped FM assume federal mogul, I will get more pics up later who knows the guy that built these was dumb, I will be using Clevite and probably coated like I normally do, I like the coated ones in case oil gets contaminated it helpskeep alive...
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.