How do you exhaust your air in 2 mins , what type of tank did he use?

I think you meant to say "enforceable". If a contract is breached by either party the contract is still valid and enforceable, unless it was signed under duress or by a minor. If the contract is "voidable" and it's voided no lawsuit and no enforcement. A "breach of contract" even knowingly is not fraud. It's a breach, that's why the different terminologies.
However, putting this on a little different perspective it's hard for ALL of us to be objective. On one hand, I wish all the best to the Gratton family and hope they win, due to the loss of a loved one. On the other hand, this suit is a BS attempt by the attorney. If you read the "complaints' It is evident there is a grudge, pissing match going on. The family is stuck in the middle. Interesting enough, lot of other "incidents' have happened in the past with no lawsuits. NO ONE really knows what happened under water, what should have been or could have been done, and if "something else" was done there is no assurance that Joey would be alive. It's ALL speculation. I suggest we ALL stop assuming and let this event take it's course.
And just one more comment. I am a certified diver, and I know that even experienced divers will have "issues" during extreme stress. I seen it. Just because some one passes the "dunk" test in a controlled environment, no assurance that reactions or decisions under stress would be the same. We don't know (and neither does the attorneys) what happened and why. Period. let it go.

Well this certainly doesn't answer my question about if the divers were in the tunnel when Page exited the escape hatch ?

Does anyone else know ???

If they were hyperventilating or breathing fast due to the situation they could run through that air pretty fast. Or if the regulator was stuck open.

I guess anything could of happen, but I would hope they check their gear between races I know we do especially our air. Pretty hard to blow though a full tank in a few mins.

Just to set the record straight, Art Lilly was not in the boat when Jack Carmody (RIP) was Killed, Dan Jackson was the Throttleman. Steve Curtis was not in the boat when Stefano (RIP) was killed, Stefano was the Throttleman as well. and Charlie Haimes accident, with Randy Linebach (RIP) was during testing , not a race.

Did those races stop? . that was the point .

The Charlie haimes incedent ( OSS opener ) happened way ouside the permisable testing area that's why rescue could not help them.. whole other story there . that one got pushed under the rug tho .

Hard to make a point when you don't have the correct facts
so now that we have the correct facts about who we are talking about.

Jack Carmody (RIP) race was not stopped
I'm pretty sure the race Stefano (RIP) was killed in was stopped.
and as you said the last one was during testing.

treme, X100, Klaat and other racers,

I posted on this thread on purpose to make a point. I would consider myself an outsider to racing and rescues, just like the jury or Joe Public reading about the case in the newspaper. By posting as an outsider to this issue I intended to get you to see how the case is being seen by others, not from your perspective which may cloud your outlook (either from race experiences, feelings about SBI or being friends with the guys that died that year). I have done threads like this in the past, though admittedly I started the thread whereas this one I chimed in early on page one, taking Matt's article and turning the thread into somewhat of a debate.

While I will never be a competitor in offshore racing as it doesn't interest me one bit you may want to consider how an outsider sees the racing even from a spectator/ town resident/ voting perspective. This case is going to make history if the judgment is in the millions and favors the plaintiffs. Everyone remembers the McDonald's coffee spill where the woman got over 1mm for spilled hot coffee right? The KW case will stick in people's memories for years, potentially making races not welcome in host cities for fear of getting sued, locals might fear the "dangerous racing" going on in their town, sponsors might not want to associate with a promoter that has had huge judgments because of safety issues. Your reactions speak volumes of how much change is going to be in your future if you continue to race because the decisions are going to be made for you, not by you. Some actual feel not stopping the race isn't crucial for safety because that is the way they always did it. Common sense, (yep from an outsider) would think that is crazy. Cops stop traffic, re-route it in a rescue/car extraction even if cars are traveling on paved roads with brakes so to consider 100 mph+ passes with wakes bouncing around, boats (with no brakes) seems insane especially considering they are racing for a trophy!!!

Look at the "likes" on this thread on my responses as well as the racers responses and you can see both sides. SBI can get out of this with the insurance company stroking the check this time but don't be surprised if things change in the future. You have already seen KW want to pull the plug on past races (through less financial support) and SBI threatened to go to another city. This case is huge for both SBI and all of its host cities.

I read the 66 page complaint and didn't see where it was mentioned. Thank you for posting that link, not sure if I could have found it easily.