Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Race Talk > General Racing Discussion
SBI/APBA, OPA, OSS  Can we grow together? >

SBI/APBA, OPA, OSS Can we grow together?

Notices

SBI/APBA, OPA, OSS Can we grow together?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-05-2008, 11:48 AM
  #161  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toledo Oh
Posts: 10,061
Received 690 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gordo
I almost snort-laughed when I read that.
As funny as it was, it's also true. Just my opinion, but we first have to think "what is best for the sport, NOT what is best for Mercracing"
back to the more fun, race to have fun, make racing more fun, more people will race, lots of people racing, mercracing takes an interest..
the sport is an offshoot of people having fun running their boat against someone elses. the "sport is not the be all end all, it is not the primary factor in the equation, think of it as a flow chart, you start at the beginning, not in the middle and not at the end going backwards

fun--> more fun--> even more fun--> full on lets have a party fun (if your having that much fun, merc and whoeverelse might want to come join the party)

it's really rather simple, but if you screw up the formula, you get frustrated, make the wrong changes and bring about the end.

Last edited by phragle; 10-05-2008 at 11:50 AM.
phragle is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 11:55 AM
  #162  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heater63
If you dont have huge waves its friggin boring.Everyone needs to stop blaming the orgs. and find a way to make it more exciting to watch.Instead of trying to place blame on someone lets try to figure out a new way to bring attention to the sport.

... more boats in less classes, parity between the boats, close racing, viewer friendly courses, great race sites, all the racers racing together.. just racing no BS...when we all are on the same page I'm sure something good will happen....not Nascar or F1, that would be a long way off, lets not kid oueselves, but maybe at least have a serious pro series of committed spec race teams and bracket teams, that could attract the media attention and sponsors we want to grow the sport in a serious way.
SpecialFX is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 04:42 PM
  #163  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MOBILEMERCMAN
Steve,
I have a few questions for you.
How many races did you race in this season and last?
Do you just show up for the worlds?
How many boats were in your class when you won high points in '06? and how many did a full season?
What is the reason the vortec for allowed to turn more rpm's when the first showed up.
Did you have to pay for your motor or were you representing?
Where are they now?

Do you have ANYTHING positive to share?
How many races did you race in this season and last?
Last season I think we did 3 this season we did just bimini

How many boats were in your class when you won high points in '06? and how many did a full season?
We have wanted to race but the SVL's have been racing OSS aside from making the time to do It I can and will race if the competition is there.

No one did a full season in SVL at SBI in 06
While we technically won high points it is not something we are touting.

What is the reason the vortec for allowed to turn more rpm's when the first showed up.
When the rev 4 version of the 525 ECM showed up just before the 1st event Mercury had added 29 hp while certifying the lower output rev 3 version. To compensate we added 200 RPM to the vortec for Super V. If you check you will find that since all SVL's had Vortecs they ran the original lower RPM so as to not upset any testing that teams had done. GM had spent a great amount of effort to make the vortec equal to the 525. When we instructed Mercury to go back to the earlier version they threatened to pull their sponsorship of APBA. Interestingly enough they never paid the bill anyway!

Did you have to pay for your motor or were you representing?

The engines were leased and yes I paid. A little known fact is that I am the biggest hp printer dealer in the US and at sometimes the World. I also own the largest privately owned lease base of hp printers so funds have never been an issue for my team. My business is very similar to Curtis Morris's from team Yahoo except we own all of the printers.

Where are they now?

I assume you are referring to GM. If so they are in Pontiac Michigan. If you are referring to why they are not in racing that would go back to the boycott even after Bob Bull took over APBA.

Do you have ANYTHING positive to share?[/QUOTE

At this time probably not! Motorsports marketing is very difficult currently there is no product to sell much beyond what is going on. The path to a tv deal and fan base would be long non productive one. Even when the LLC was at its peak it became a deal with SBI was imperative. Multiple companies trying to sell the same sport against each other is a losing proposition. Bob Bull realized the same conclusion and did his deal with SBI as that was the only path that made sense.

The moral of the story is that few marketing departments can see a value in Offshore powerboat racing the multiple classes and sanctioning bodies combined with the transient natures of the competitors make it a bad investment.
If you look back at the powerhouse sanctioning groups they started with core sponsors (car manufacturers) then parts and now can sell most any type of product. Currently boat racing has only one manufacturer (Mercury Racing) so the road would be long if you started traveling it today.

Steve

Last edited by smiklos@sunprint; 10-05-2008 at 04:47 PM.
smiklos@sunprint is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 04:48 PM
  #164  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BRUCE SEROFF
in some crazy way i agree. I think sponsors first need to see a product they want to endorse. yes, we all do this because its fun. I believe, when most of us started racing, we were not thinking bout having someone ie: a sponsor, picking up the tab for our hobby. Boat racing is an expensive hobby no doubt. We do it because we love it. When it stops being fun we quit because there is no other motivating factor. Im am the perfect example. I let my feelings toward certain people get in the way of doing something I once enjoyed very much. For the most part, I enjoy hanging with most of you guys and enjoy the comraderie and competition. But all the politics continues to get in the way of moving forward. Every organization has their own adjenda, none of which is wrong. We, as racers need to join together for the good of that ultimate goal. Sending a message to potential sponsors that we have a marketable product. Hey ...if congress can get together and piss away 700 billion dollars, we certainly can agree to make a better show for the general public. Its too late to point fingers at the cause of the collapse, and it only does more harm to an already fragmented sport. Its done but not forgotten. All we can do is move forward in a positive manner.

peace out
Well put Mr. Seroff
Steve
smiklos@sunprint is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:18 PM
  #165  
Registered
 
TYPHOON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Edison NJ USA
Posts: 5,090
Received 190 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I agree TV is nice but its a bonus at this point for our sport. The cost to put on a quality 1/2 hour show on a good station is crazy money for an organization to pay. Speed channel on Sun. morning was the best it ever was and I was lucky to get lots of exposure for our team. With so many classes to cover you will always have people pissed that they were not covered or mention ect. ect. ect.
At the end of the day we did not get even one offer or land a single sponsor for our boat. Lots and lots of prime time Speed vission coverage on TV and not a single dollar from anyone. So I ask why do so many people think the org. should spend more money on producing a TV show when the racers get so little return? Yes it helps put our sport in front of more people and possibly a few teams might be able to land some sponsor money but at what cost to the rest of us?
The only way I see TV working is focus on 1-2 classes only and hope that builds those classes.
MD
TYPHOON is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:52 PM
  #166  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Steve,
Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions.


Maybe if the teams can align themselves the best they can given their situations. Then the strongest groups of committed full season racers who are willing and able to travel can emerge and become marketable again.

The real trick is getting the smaller classes [smaller by number of boats] and less committed ones to except they are not the show. One or two well attended races does not make a show. Consistent attendance of strong numbered classes does.

This seasons numbers show Cat 850 , SVL, Class 5 are the most competitive. A few more potentially strong classes have boats scattered across all clubs and numerous classes.

If a team doesn't intend to run a full season its ideals or preferences shouldn't weight as heavy as a committed team.

I still have hope Offshore can continue to grow. If everyone could be realistic in there expectations progress can still be made.
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:02 PM
  #167  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by BRUCE SEROFF
in some crazy way i agree. I think sponsors first need to see a product they want to endorse. yes, we all do this because its fun. I believe, when most of us started racing, we were not thinking bout having someone ie: a sponsor, picking up the tab for our hobby. Boat racing is an expensive hobby no doubt. We do it because we love it. When it stops being fun we quit because there is no other motivating factor. Im am the perfect example. I let my feelings toward certain people get in the way of doing something I once enjoyed very much. For the most part, I enjoy hanging with most of you guys and enjoy the comraderie and competition. But all the politics continues to get in the way of moving forward. Every organization has their own adjenda, none of which is wrong. We, as racers need to join together for the good of that ultimate goal. Sending a message to potential sponsors that we have a marketable product. Hey ...if congress can get together and piss away 700 billion dollars, we certainly can agree to make a better show for the general public. Its too late to point fingers at the cause of the collapse, and it only does more harm to an already fragmented sport. Its done but not forgotten. All we can do is move forward in a positive manner.

peace out
Bruce,
I totally agree.We can also look at what has happened in other forms of motorsports.The IRL-CART battle all but destroyed indy car racing.Everyone said that they would never get back together;but ,the very survival of thier sport depended on it.This season they came together for the betterment of everyone involved.It was not easy,and there are still issues to resolve;but overall the results have been very positive.
I only hope that this can happen in offshore powerboat racing as well.

Last edited by 1waterboy1; 10-05-2008 at 11:06 PM.
1waterboy1 is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 07:03 PM
  #168  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1waterboy1
Bruce,
I totally agree.We can also look at what has happened in other forms of motorsports.The IRL-CART battle all but destroyed indy car racing.Everyone said that they would never get back together;but ,the very survival of thier sport depened on it.This season they came together for the betterment of everyone involved.It was not easy,and there are still issues to resolve;but overall the results have been very positive.
I only hope that this can happen in offshore powerboat racing as well.
Yep People like Paul Newman and Roger Penske could not get it done until it became patently obvious both were about to fail. If you look during this time of the CART IRL battle racing went mainstream marketing. A few ego's let America's premier open wheel series become a financial shambles while others reached marks that were believed totally unobtainable.

Oddly I believe that another strike (baseball) is what put NASCAR on the mainstream map. America wanted something to watch. The Cup guys were real refreshing when compared to a baseball player striking to get a pay raise. The damage to baseball is still felt to this day.
Steve
smiklos@sunprint is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 07:37 PM
  #169  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default GM Deal

I think the main problem with the GM deal was the racers did not understand what it was about.

The most important part was to sell trucks. That is the highest margin piece in American auto makers product line. By racing as many stock parts as possible GM was proving through offshore racing that their engines were real robust. A boat racing show was much more exciting then an infomercial so GM could afford to pay for a large portion of the TV and get a great return on their investment..

The most common misconception was that GM was going in the marine engine business. The reality is they allready are and own about 95% of the gas engine market share for inboards and I/O's

The most inovative part was what the racers had to offer GM.
Think about this what is the workers compensation rate for high speed test boat driver?

What would it cost GM to have a fleet of test boats running year round in grueling conditions?

The value is we racers will pay to test this stuff and we buy trucks. So you can build an incredible program that is a win win for sponsor and racer. Keep in mind when Mercury won GM still did also because the 525 is mostly a GM product.

I really do not see a deal like this ever coming along again my point is if one did would the racers act the same way?
Steve

Last edited by smiklos@sunprint; 10-05-2008 at 07:40 PM.
smiklos@sunprint is offline  
Old 10-05-2008, 10:39 PM
  #170  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Edited...........

Last edited by Gordon Michael; 10-06-2008 at 03:47 PM.
Gordon Michael is offline  


Quick Reply: SBI/APBA, OPA, OSS Can we grow together?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.