Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Pantera
so they filed for bankruptcy >

so they filed for bankruptcy

Notices

so they filed for bankruptcy

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-13-2012 | 11:27 AM
  #251  
Tony Montana's Avatar
The BAD Guy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 1
From: Jupiter, FL
Default

Originally Posted by mikebrls
just out of curiosity what a 28 , 36 and 41 complete mold's worth these day's $ 200 - $ 250 k ? " maybe "


mike
Not much! Mike instead of staying on the side lines TELL your story. Jo keeps saying that people who have never delt with them keep posting BS. YOU are the reason I didn't buy a Pantera when I was looking!
Tony Montana is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 12:03 PM
  #252  
birdog's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,035
Likes: 5
From: Batavia Oh.
Default

Originally Posted by JO - PANTERABOATS




We are not thiefs, scammers, etc. etc. like a few of you have posted that enjoy the drama while hiding behind a computer and continue to write false and un-true things.

"We owe no money to our suppliers".





Well...Actually.....Where i come from not honoring your word makes you just that.

You dont need my name or # I have NO desire to speak to you
birdog is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 12:53 PM
  #253  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Middle of the high desert
Default

Originally Posted by jmeng
Fountain doesn't have a history of screwing customers out of money, then declaring bankruptcy and changing names to get out of trouble.
No, but when Fountain declared bankruptcy for the first time in 2009 they listed assets of only $50k (and millions in liabilities). Meanwhile, the Fountain family was living large; big house, plenty of toys....much like the Nunez family has been accused of.

I know it isn't a direct comparison; obviously Pantera has played the shell game multiple times and Fountain had millions of $ in debt so they're very different cases to be sure....but there are a few parallels.

I'm just curious why the court of public opinion seemed to give Fountain a pass when they went out owing creditors more than all of the Pantera bankruptcies put together.

For the record, I don't think either company did the right thing.
emilsr is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 01:24 PM
  #254  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,999
Likes: 1,066
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Originally Posted by emilsr
Meanwhile, the Fountain family was living large; big house, plenty of toys....much like the Nunez family has been accused of.
The only thing the Pantera folks have been accused of is not delivering despite being paid.
Indy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 01:43 PM
  #255  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 32
From: Oneida Lake NY
Default

Originally Posted by emilsr
No, but when Fountain declared bankruptcy for the first time in 2009 they listed assets of only $50k (and millions in liabilities). Meanwhile, the Fountain family was living large; big house, plenty of toys....much like the Nunez family has been accused of.

I know it isn't a direct comparison; obviously Pantera has played the shell game multiple times and Fountain had millions of $ in debt so they're very different cases to be sure....but there are a few parallels.

I'm just curious why the court of public opinion seemed to give Fountain a pass when they went out owing creditors more than all of the Pantera bankruptcies put together.

For the record, I don't think either company did the right thing.
I don't think either company did the right thing either. How about the Automakers BK? Didn't seem right as well.

HOWEVER. What is happening at Pantera is different in many ways. They have a history of BK and fraud, and used this last BK to stiff and protect them from ONE, yes ONE customer that paid in full!

I guess Berk extended credit to pantera when he prepaid for the boat, and that was a mistake. I have just never heard of such a thing, I have seen businesses go down but still find a way to take care of the customers.
4bus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 05:00 PM
  #256  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 6
From: west palm beach FL,
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Montana
Not much! Mike instead of staying on the side lines TELL your story. Jo keeps saying that people who have never delt with them keep posting BS. YOU are the reason I didn't buy a Pantera when I was looking!
I already spoke my voice somewhere in this thread or another related thread. I don't need to keep talking about my situation it was a long time ago and under the bridge " I have moved on "

mike
mikebrls is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 05:42 PM
  #257  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Originally Posted by 4bus
I don't think either company did the right thing either. How about the Automakers BK? Didn't seem right as well.

HOWEVER. What is happening at Pantera is different in many ways. They have a history of BK and fraud, and used this last BK to stiff and protect them from ONE, yes ONE customer that paid in full!

I guess Berk extended credit to pantera when he prepaid for the boat, and that was a mistake. I have just never heard of such a thing, I have seen businesses go down but still find a way to take care of the customers.
I assume that the 1 customer that you are referring to that has Paid for his new Pantera 28sr In Full is Scott... I was also under the impression that Berk had also Paid In-Full for his new boat, if so that is 2 customers who are on the Short End of the Stick and probably will never see their New Boats or a Single Dime from Pantera...

I have owned 2 Panteras, a 1995 24SE and a 2005 28 which I still have and will say that I truly love... I have read every single post on this board and I have also become friends with a few of the people who have purchased new Panteras and I can tell you without a Shafow of a Doubt that every one of them were Night Mares... I am not trying to Stir this Pot, but both of my Dealings with Pantera Did Not go very well and I have been waiting for Promisses Made to me by them since 2007... I am trying to stay out of this Thread to the best of my ability and I am sure that some of you are going to Bash Me and that's Okay, but what Pantera has done to their Customers over the past many years is just Plain Out Bullsh*t... DO NOT FOOL YOURSELF, they are totally AWARE of what they have done and are still going to do to ALL and ANY New Pantera Boat Owners...
Wylie-Rat is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 06:13 PM
  #258  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 122
Default

It seems like the truly "happy" Pantera customers are those who bought used...from private parties. Has anyone who ordered a new Pantera come forward and proclaimed their immense satisfaction and happiness?
pasquesi is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 06:15 PM
  #259  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 32
From: Oneida Lake NY
Default

Originally Posted by Wylie-Rat
I assume that the 1 customer that you are referring to that has Paid for his new Pantera 28sr In Full is Scott... I was also under the impression that Berk had also Paid In-Full for his new boat, if so that is 2 customers who are on the Short End of the Stick and probably will never see their New Boats or a Single Dime from Pantera...

I have owned 2 Panteras, a 1995 24SE and a 2005 28 which I still have and will say that I truly love... I have read every single post on this board and I have also become friends with a few of the people who have purchased new Panteras and I can tell you without a Shafow of a Doubt that every one of them were Night Mares... I am not trying to Stir this Pot, but both of my Dealings with Pantera Did Not go very well and I have been waiting for Promisses Made to me by them since 2007... I am trying to stay out of this Thread to the best of my ability and I am sure that some of you are going to Bash Me and that's Okay, but what Pantera has done to their Customers over the past many years is just Plain Out Bullsh*t... DO NOT FOOL YOURSELF, they are totally AWARE of what they have done and are still going to do to ALL and ANY New Pantera Boat Owners...
Berk was the only one referenced on the recent BK, that is why I posted him. There is a laundry list.

I applaud you for being a pantera owner and not having blind loyalty. How anyone can defend these guys is beyond me. Being a fan of a product (it is a good product IMO) should not make you forget ethics, class, and honor.
4bus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2012 | 06:19 PM
  #260  
Expensive Date's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 1
From: West Creek NJ
Default

Originally Posted by emilsr
No, but when Fountain declared bankruptcy for the first time in 2009 they listed assets of only $50k (and millions in liabilities). Meanwhile, the Fountain family was living large; big house, plenty of toys....much like the Nunez family has been accused of.

I know it isn't a direct comparison; obviously Pantera has played the shell game multiple times and Fountain had millions of $ in debt so they're very different cases to be sure....but there are a few parallels.

I'm just curious why the court of public opinion seemed to give Fountain a pass when they went out owing creditors more than all of the Pantera bankruptcies put together.

For the record, I don't think either company did the right thing.

Stockholders, banks new the risk it part of the game. Pantera is telling people "we can do an over the winter build" when they have not finished boats from two years ago.

I trade stocks most of the time I make money once in a while I get burned it happens its how the game is played. But when you put a deposit down on a boat thats supposed to be done in six months and two years later they don't even have an engine for it sorry thats different.
Expensive Date is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.