Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Prop Talk (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/prop-talk-165/)
-   -   Speeds: 24/7 Hulls with 496 HO (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/prop-talk/279733-speeds-24-7-hulls-496-ho.html)

tomas_wallin 11-23-2012 10:32 AM


Originally Posted by CafeRacerPTY (Post 3820210)
Engine is a 496ho, 420hp

not sure about the prop have to measure later and advise. thanks

My prop depth is about 3-1/2" below bottom. I also have CMI sport tube headers that gains a bit and Gibson Bullet mufflers that robs a bit.

You should also check the straightness of your bottom! I have put quite a few hours on mine to get it straight and sharp.

CafeRacerPTY 11-23-2012 11:29 AM

Measured the distance from bottom kiel to prop shaft is about 10.5 inches!

Based on your set up i guess it is way to low?

professor_speed 11-23-2012 12:50 PM

:eekdrop: 10.5 is deeper than mercury recommends for regular non performance boats. that would put you cav plate below the bottom. there is major drag from your set up, I would guess that you are giving up at least 10mph if not more. those are bravo 2 like prop depths, are you sure its not a bravo 2?

CafeRacerPTY 11-23-2012 03:27 PM


Originally Posted by professor_speed (Post 3820312)
:eekdrop: 10.5 is deeper than mercury recommends for regular non performance boats. that would put you cav plate below the bottom. there is major drag from your set up, I would guess that you are giving up at least 10mph if not more. those are bravo 2 like prop depths, are you sure its not a bravo 2?

drive is a bravo 1 x . went to measure and check again just to make sure.
http://i1062.photobucket.com/albums/...1123-00092.jpg

professor_speed 11-23-2012 05:12 PM

Hmm it doesn't look like 10.5 deep, looks more like 8.5 or so but either way that's too deep imo, look at the example set here his boat is working well at 3.5 under

CafeRacerPTY 11-23-2012 08:31 PM


Originally Posted by professor_speed (Post 3820421)
Hmm it doesn't look like 10.5 deep, looks more like 8.5 or so but either way that's too deep imo, look at the example set here his boat is working well at 3.5 under

thanks prof, and you are right about the depth of the shaft, second time measuring i had the trailer accomodated in order to completly lower the drive, it was about 9 inches.

so, what are my options? my first thought would be to move the whole assembly 3-4 inches up and also a shorter lower unit. thoughts?

professor_speed 11-23-2012 09:24 PM

Sounds like a good plan, just make sure the bottom is straight, no hook sorry for the :hijack: But this stuff should apply to most straight hulls. And again tomas_wallin thanks for sharing it shows there is a lot to gain with straight bottoms by setting them up to take advantage of current prop technology, and taking time to tune the hull

akaboatman 11-23-2012 10:10 PM

That scag wan't work if You rase the X.

Sport 280 12-16-2012 02:23 PM

scag 67 up, 45 down
abbreviation of 'scumbag' meaning exactly that, or lowlife, cad, overall person of ill character. useful when avoiding expletives in potential road rage situations, and also used in 'Mad Max' the movie.
driver : that scag just cut me up at the roundabout!
passenger : yeah he was driving like a scag!

Nope, that will not work on a high x dimension drive:))

pantera232 01-13-2013 06:02 PM

When you guys do the measurement is it with the drive trimmed all the way down or trimmed at wfo ???? And what are your options? obviously raising the drive but anything easier


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.