Help with prop to Chris Craft 260 Stinger
#31
Yes, I would do one thing at a time and then test. If you do two things, and something improves, you won't know which one caused the improvement or what direction to proceed.
#33
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 325
Likes: 25
From: Sweden
You don't want it plugged at all. You want the water to flow through it and out an external hull dump.
Yes, I would do one thing at a time and then test. If you do two things, and something improves, you won't know which one caused the improvement or what direction to proceed.
Yes, I would do one thing at a time and then test. If you do two things, and something improves, you won't know which one caused the improvement or what direction to proceed.

I mean the original water inlet to the engine, that one is plugged and replaced with the water pickup.
I dont mean that youre not right, its just me that dont understand I think

Yes I will do that. Youre right!
I wonder if there is someone that have done this, with a extentionbox or high drive mount on a Chris Craft 260 Stinger before..?
Have tried to find any information about it but without sucess. Seems that im the ”first” and first testing with this to make it work.
But when I read about high drive mount boats they say I will need a propeller with high rake.
And a propeller with high rake will ”lift the bow” ore in correct words, lift the stern less
Last edited by JohanSweden; 06-26-2020 at 01:52 AM.
#34
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 177
From: Finland
But if I unplug it in the transom assembly it will flow water into the boat? 
I mean the original water inlet to the engine, that one is plugged and replaced with the water pickup.
I dont mean that youre not right, its just me that dont understand I think
Yes I will do that. Youre right!
I wonder if there is someone that have done this, with a extentionbox or high drive mount on a Chris Craft 260 Stinger before..?
Have tried to find any information about it but without sucess. Seems that im the ”first” and first testing with this to make it work.
But when I read about high drive mount boats they say I will need a propeller with high rake.
And a propeller with high rake will ”lift the bow” ore in correct words, lift the stern less

I mean the original water inlet to the engine, that one is plugged and replaced with the water pickup.
I dont mean that youre not right, its just me that dont understand I think

Yes I will do that. Youre right!
I wonder if there is someone that have done this, with a extentionbox or high drive mount on a Chris Craft 260 Stinger before..?
Have tried to find any information about it but without sucess. Seems that im the ”first” and first testing with this to make it work.
But when I read about high drive mount boats they say I will need a propeller with high rake.
And a propeller with high rake will ”lift the bow” ore in correct words, lift the stern less
#35
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 325
Likes: 25
From: Sweden
If the engine rpm is going down and the teoretical prop slip is going down then maybe have to go down in pitch?
Or leave it to someone that can lab it in some way
#36
More blades and more blade surface area increase stern lift.
The water that flows though the transom assembly gets connected to another hose and then connected to a thru hull fitting that dumps the water outside the boat.
The water that flows though the transom assembly gets connected to another hose and then connected to a thru hull fitting that dumps the water outside the boat.
#39
The whipple stage 1 is an small reprogram of the PCM not an SC and water pick up is for the engine since he said transom/drive p/u is plugged.
#40
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 325
Likes: 25
From: Sweden
I have no whipple kit on it. Just the PCM reprogram stage 1 whipple for the Mercruiser 496.
I dont think it is... it looks like it have been labbed.





