duramax or power stroke?
#41
Registered
Kenny, you are just mad because you totalled the Ranchero with only 6,000lbs behind it as you were searching for your maximum GCVW of another ford product. How'd that werk out fer ya??.......Oh yea.....NOT TOO GOOOOOOOOD! I don't care what anyone says, I dont think that the fact that you were looking for the perfect radio station to suit your mood before you went to sleep had anything to do with the ensuing "baja bomb" that went off. You do get the bananna peel receiver hitch explosion award. The funny thing is.......after the crash.....you were back within spec on your GVW....as your "cargo" was scattered across quite an expansive area.....come to think of it.....I am not the only one who has "towed like a retard" before....., you looked like one of "jerry's kids towing a baja" trying to get home that night....ahhh...the memories....
#42
Registered
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know....i'm just phucking with you. I still laugh about some of that chit....and then kiss the ground that I am still alive....
#43
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Duramax vs Powerstroke
Well if the 6.0 powerstroke had not come out, i would call the thread title a contradiction in terms. The powerstroke 7.3 Deisel ended in 2003 and was in my opinion the best engine I have ever used.
The duramax will not hold up to the punishment of towing everyday like the powerstroke or the Cummins.I just never like the lack of power on the duramax.
The 6.4 is a much improvement over the 6.0 but until the new motor is tested more, i would keep your old 7.3 or cummins.
The ford is without a doubt (not the 6.0) the best nuilt truck for working and hauling out of the three.
Jump_26Transportation
The duramax will not hold up to the punishment of towing everyday like the powerstroke or the Cummins.I just never like the lack of power on the duramax.
The 6.4 is a much improvement over the 6.0 but until the new motor is tested more, i would keep your old 7.3 or cummins.
The ford is without a doubt (not the 6.0) the best nuilt truck for working and hauling out of the three.
Jump_26Transportation
#44
Registered User
Actually....I am not illegal as hell. The trailer is registered as an RV so I am not bound by the 26K guidlines. I was told that by a tennessee commercial enforcement guy....right or wrong that is good enough for me....since he is the one who writes the tickets around here for this type of stuff. :
The RV registration thing is more of a detriment than a shelter. That shows you're knowingly maneuvering to avoid compliance. If you have to play that card in front of a jury in a civil trial or a reckless homicide prosecution, I don't think they'll buy it. No smart attorney would ever let you try.
No bash intended, just hopefully trying to help you see it from a different perspective.
#45
Registered User
On the Chevy/Ford argument...
There's a reason that for every Chevy truck in commercial fleet service in the US there are two Fords. Setting aside for a moment the arguments about long-term brand loyalties among fleet buyers and Ford's aggressive marketing to this sector, if Fords possessed a persistent problem with their product, their number would drop.
Of course Ford had some issues with the 6.0 early on. They weren't nearly as rampant as reported. At the same time, anyone who things that GM doesn't have their share of problems is dreaming. I've personally owned 6 or 7 6.0's. I now have an '03 Ex and an '05, plus the shop trucks. The "nightmare" '03 has had minimal work. The '05 has had none. The two '03 shop trucks we had were literally worn out when we dumped them. Over 250K on each. Neither had the engine or trans apart in the entire time we had them.
There's a reason that for every Chevy truck in commercial fleet service in the US there are two Fords. Setting aside for a moment the arguments about long-term brand loyalties among fleet buyers and Ford's aggressive marketing to this sector, if Fords possessed a persistent problem with their product, their number would drop.
Of course Ford had some issues with the 6.0 early on. They weren't nearly as rampant as reported. At the same time, anyone who things that GM doesn't have their share of problems is dreaming. I've personally owned 6 or 7 6.0's. I now have an '03 Ex and an '05, plus the shop trucks. The "nightmare" '03 has had minimal work. The '05 has had none. The two '03 shop trucks we had were literally worn out when we dumped them. Over 250K on each. Neither had the engine or trans apart in the entire time we had them.
#46
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Raleigh,NC & 1000 Islands,NY
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rumors
On the Chevy/Ford argument...
There's a reason that for every Chevy truck in commercial fleet service in the US there are two Fords. Setting aside for a moment the arguments about long-term brand loyalties among fleet buyers and Ford's aggressive marketing to this sector, if Fords possessed a persistent problem with their product, their number would drop.
Of course Ford had some issues with the 6.0 early on. They weren't nearly as rampant as reported. At the same time, anyone who things that GM doesn't have their share of problems is dreaming. I've personally owned 6 or 7 6.0's. I now have an '03 Ex and an '05, plus the shop trucks. The "nightmare" '03 has had minimal work. The '05 has had none. The two '03 shop trucks we had were literally worn out when we dumped them. Over 250K on each. Neither had the engine or trans apart in the entire time we had them.
There's a reason that for every Chevy truck in commercial fleet service in the US there are two Fords. Setting aside for a moment the arguments about long-term brand loyalties among fleet buyers and Ford's aggressive marketing to this sector, if Fords possessed a persistent problem with their product, their number would drop.
Of course Ford had some issues with the 6.0 early on. They weren't nearly as rampant as reported. At the same time, anyone who things that GM doesn't have their share of problems is dreaming. I've personally owned 6 or 7 6.0's. I now have an '03 Ex and an '05, plus the shop trucks. The "nightmare" '03 has had minimal work. The '05 has had none. The two '03 shop trucks we had were literally worn out when we dumped them. Over 250K on each. Neither had the engine or trans apart in the entire time we had them.
#47
Registered
Someone last night saw my truck and was asking if I would recommend buying a newer ford. I said the same thing as here. Ford builds the best work truck. They just don't build the best engines. Thats gas and diesel.
The 6.0l was hit and miss. If you have a good one, they are a damn good engine. Its if you have a bad one, and the chances of that scare me away. Also, in terms of driving I don't like the 6.0l torqshift vs. duramax allison combo. I've driven all combinations of both. The duramax keeps the rpms much lower, I always feel like the 6.0l is revving to the moon. Fords shifting strategy is neat. The torqshift is really a 6 speed trans, and they alternate 2nd and 3rd (2b) gear based on temp, loading ext. So it would go 12a345, or 12b345
The 6.4l has been getting good reports, but fuel milleage has been reported everywhere on the low side.
Pros and cons of all 3,the duramax comes out on top.
#48
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lake George NY
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#49
Registered
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With all due respect, your concern shouldn't be the $200 ticket you might get. Your concern is probably better placed in avoiding the possibility of having your insurer deny coverage on a multi-million dollar claim. It's also probably better directed at avoiding a criminal charge in the event someone dies in an accident, considering you knowingly disregarded the mechanical capabilities of your rig. Lastly, My guess is you don't want to live the rest of your life with the burden of having caused the injury or death of another.
The RV registration thing is more of a detriment than a shelter. That shows you're knowingly maneuvering to avoid compliance. If you have to play that card in front of a jury in a civil trial or a reckless homicide prosecution, I don't think they'll buy it. No smart attorney would ever let you try.
No bash intended, just hopefully trying to help you see it from a different perspective.
The RV registration thing is more of a detriment than a shelter. That shows you're knowingly maneuvering to avoid compliance. If you have to play that card in front of a jury in a civil trial or a reckless homicide prosecution, I don't think they'll buy it. No smart attorney would ever let you try.
No bash intended, just hopefully trying to help you see it from a different perspective.
Last edited by thunderusone; 02-17-2008 at 08:26 AM.