Funny tread in General Discussion
#22
Registered
check the latest in GD...
Formula has "lousy graphics"
and
Nordic's tooling is far superior the Formula...something to that effect.
Tooling huh? How many boats/parts a year get popped from that tooling? What is the demand on the tooling and how would it hold up in terms of repetition/quality if real production number demands were placed on it?
Quick to call Nordics' tooling "far superior" don't 'ya think?
I mean there might be some nice shapes there, but there is more to it than that.
Graphics:
What one man considers "lousy" 98% of the boating world calls "classy" and "timeless". Now some of the Platinum offering have been bordering on risky for long term appeal, but hey if it goes totaly out of acceptable style...change them. It's paint!
Have fun in the real boating world long-term caring for and repairing in-gel colors/graphics, fine for some Lake Havasu trailered garage queen...
durability/repairability not a strong suit in this regard as compared to Imron paint.
we'll see what those gel colors look like in 5, 10 or better yet 20 summers of UV and real world boating use.
and how well the often trendy west coast inspired graphics and colors stand the test of time.
How many Formula's do we know personally that are 20 years old and show simply phenomenal for their age? If not mistaken for as new by the casual observer?
What's that say?
I hope the thread keeps going. It's a wake-up call as to how many don't know their *** from a hole in the ground.
Not just in terms of the Formula product, but generally.
Having been here a few years now I also remember several Nordic horror stories...but I won't bash- they make a "pretty" and "sexy" boat to look at
Just changed ownership huh? Hmmm...that right there would steer me away.
ZERO term track record of present ownership standing behind the product.
Not an issue with the Porters.
The Formula family feeling, combined with the aura of quality about the boats which in turn promotes incredible pride in ownership.
There's nothing like it in production boatbuilding and you won't know the difference until you own one, period.
Is that pretty close?
Formula has "lousy graphics"
and
Nordic's tooling is far superior the Formula...something to that effect.
Tooling huh? How many boats/parts a year get popped from that tooling? What is the demand on the tooling and how would it hold up in terms of repetition/quality if real production number demands were placed on it?
Quick to call Nordics' tooling "far superior" don't 'ya think?
I mean there might be some nice shapes there, but there is more to it than that.
Graphics:
What one man considers "lousy" 98% of the boating world calls "classy" and "timeless". Now some of the Platinum offering have been bordering on risky for long term appeal, but hey if it goes totaly out of acceptable style...change them. It's paint!
Have fun in the real boating world long-term caring for and repairing in-gel colors/graphics, fine for some Lake Havasu trailered garage queen...
durability/repairability not a strong suit in this regard as compared to Imron paint.
we'll see what those gel colors look like in 5, 10 or better yet 20 summers of UV and real world boating use.
and how well the often trendy west coast inspired graphics and colors stand the test of time.
How many Formula's do we know personally that are 20 years old and show simply phenomenal for their age? If not mistaken for as new by the casual observer?
What's that say?
I hope the thread keeps going. It's a wake-up call as to how many don't know their *** from a hole in the ground.
Not just in terms of the Formula product, but generally.
Having been here a few years now I also remember several Nordic horror stories...but I won't bash- they make a "pretty" and "sexy" boat to look at
Just changed ownership huh? Hmmm...that right there would steer me away.
ZERO term track record of present ownership standing behind the product.
Not an issue with the Porters.
The Formula family feeling, combined with the aura of quality about the boats which in turn promotes incredible pride in ownership.
There's nothing like it in production boatbuilding and you won't know the difference until you own one, period.
Is that pretty close?
Last edited by Rippem; 02-01-2008 at 08:35 PM.
#23
Registered
And I quote. So the shameless plug was here before I ever posted. So there!!!
#24
Registered
Dave,I ve been a boat dealer for 41 years,sold just lots of brands over the years,sold Formula for 16 years. There is no boat company with customer support even close to Formula. Need a wiring diagram for a 25 year old Formula,they send it no charge. Need an emblem or a swim platform gasket for a 25 year old Formula, they are in stock. Many companies can't supply parts for 5 year old boats. Check the thread here from the guy from Norway,wanting the PB test of his 87 242,Daryl sent it to him no charge. Their tech assistance group (TAG) is the model for any boat company to follow,but I don't know of any that do.If I have ever had an unhappy Formula owner,they never told me about it. Coming to Bham Show? Got passes and a 353 for you. Robert
#26
21 and 42 footers
Platinum Member
TCBoss302
Apparently you know Robert or your in his area.....If you decide on Formula, Robert is just the kind of people Formula wants working for them. My 382 came from him and although I'm 700-800 miles away, it went as smoothly as buying from my neighbor.
A buddy has a 35 Nordic and it's a fast boat that looks resonably well built. When HE compared it to Formula he said he wanted a fast boat and didn't mind dealing with a boat that didn't ride as well in the rough since he didn't get out in "big" water very often anyway....speed was worth the occasional beating in his eyes.
Apparently you know Robert or your in his area.....If you decide on Formula, Robert is just the kind of people Formula wants working for them. My 382 came from him and although I'm 700-800 miles away, it went as smoothly as buying from my neighbor.
A buddy has a 35 Nordic and it's a fast boat that looks resonably well built. When HE compared it to Formula he said he wanted a fast boat and didn't mind dealing with a boat that didn't ride as well in the rough since he didn't get out in "big" water very often anyway....speed was worth the occasional beating in his eyes.