Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
42 or 47, 850's or 1075's >

42 or 47, 850's or 1075's

Notices

42 or 47, 850's or 1075's

Old 09-10-2007 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default 42 or 47, 850's or 1075's

I have offically been bitten by the faster is better bug. I have a 05' 38 Lightning w/525's that I have had for about six weeks and I want to go bigger and faster and I am looking for some feedback. I want to get either a 42 or 47 w/850's or 1075's. Does anyone know what the true speeds are on either of these boats with this power? I will be using the boat in the ocean off of atlantic city, NJ and would benefit from the added length of the 47 but like the higher speeds of the 42.

How many hours will I get out of either of these engines and what maintenance do they need? Is there any reliability discrepancy between these two engines?

Thanks for your help.
TJ
TJ Bart is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2007 | 10:06 PM
  #2  
OL40SVX's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,276
Likes: 23
From: Bristol, RI
Default

My personal opinion is that I would go for the 42 with 700's and sixes. There you have a bullet proof 100+ mph boat all day long in pretty much any water.
OL40SVX is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2007 | 10:11 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the input. Why the 700's? Are they more reliable/efficent then the 850's or 1075's?
TJ Bart is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2007 | 10:18 PM
  #4  
99fever27's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 1
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by fountain40icbm
My personal opinion is that I would go for the 42 with 700's and sixes. There you have a bullet proof 100+ mph boat all day long in pretty much any water.
ditto...What will you do with the 38'?
99fever27 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2007 | 11:10 PM
  #5  
jryan26's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Default

42 with 1075's should run 130.
jryan26 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2007 | 11:29 PM
  #6  
OL40SVX's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,276
Likes: 23
From: Bristol, RI
Default

Originally Posted by TJ Bart
Thanks for the input. Why the 700's? Are they more reliable/efficent then the 850's or 1075's?
In other words, YES.
OL40SVX is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2007 | 07:01 AM
  #7  
sleeper_dave's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Default

Lower HP will equal longer life, generally speaking. The "routine maintenance" for an 850 or a 1075 involves tearing the motor down every 100 or so hours...
sleeper_dave is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2007 | 08:27 AM
  #8  
UNSANE's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 1
From: O-town
Default

Originally Posted by sleeper_dave
Lower HP will equal longer life, generally speaking. The "routine maintenance" for an 850 or a 1075 involves tearing the motor down every 100 or so hours...
At a cost of 26k PER engine!!!
UNSANE is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2007 | 02:31 PM
  #9  
monstaaa's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 3
From: long island, newyork
Default

42 , 700's and 6's , just over 100.

42, 850's and 6's, 115- 118
42, 1075'S AND 6'S, 126- 130+

maintanance on the 700 is the best as for refreshens. how ever you saying you have the bug, and 6 weeks in your 38 , i would say thw 42 with 1075's.

only draw back is at about 60-70 hrs , top half and 100- 120 refresh. how ever the memories and feeling the adrenaline will send thru you will easily out way the cost.

not to summarize, but if you can dish out the coin for a 42/ 1075 boat, dont sweat the details.
monstaaa is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2007 | 02:59 PM
  #10  
tblrklakemo's Avatar
SeaRay Sundancer
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
From: SW Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by monstaaa
not to summarize, but if you can dish out the coin for a 42/ 1075 boat, dont sweat the details.

Yup.


Why not go the 47 twin 1500 route?
tblrklakemo is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.