arnesons are more expensive then a 6?

I just want to know what you guys do to get all the money,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, need any help

The coolness you cant argue that , I hope it works out for you Eric , cant wait to see the process , we need a hydrodynamics expert on here to explain I cant believe it would make that much difference .

Arnesons are supposed to be cheaper than bravo setup I thought , and I wonder if Eric can adopt an older guy like me ???

It does make that much of a difference.

I know he doesnt have the -4 lowers but are they that fat and bulbus even with his drives as high as they are ? I mean how much material is really dragging through the water ?

The way I understand it is this:

1. The gears in the SCX are HUGE..and they create a tremendous amound of friction/HP loss.

2. They are immersed in a $hitload of oil thus creating more HP loss. Whereas the #6 is a dry-sump setup.

3. The X dim will likely go up higher when we go to #6 setup. Our X is high...but not insanely high.

4. The standard SCX lower is HUGE...the #6 lower is like a Ginsu knife.

5. I like girls with huge fake tit$.

We are buying used #6's...

I live in a van down by the river....

So are they going to fill and recut your transom , raise or lower your starboard engine as well as move it forward ? this van is it stationary or are you using it to pull the boat ?

I'm subscribed! Enjoyed the banter, info and looking forward to more of it this winter! Carry on.....

I just got a quote from Rik @ Arneson. I may of mispoke earlier....decisions, decisions.