Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Drive questions Teague/Imco/Bmax >

Drive questions Teague/Imco/Bmax

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Drive questions Teague/Imco/Bmax

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-18-2012 | 05:06 PM
  #111  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Union, NE
Default

Originally Posted by Rik
I'd like to know what experience you have with a surface drive also Waconda. You seem to have an erection for ARNESONS.

I did not seem to read where you addressed the speed loss with a BMAX. You mentioned 8-10 mph but blamed it on the operators in the past. You said " As with any new drive set up props will have to be tested to get it dialed in." I take it that this is an extra cost for the boater also? Your budget does not seem to mention setup work after someone purchases a BMAX.

If you need an explanation of pricing, price out a complete, not a portion of a drive but a complete drive assembly that is required to make a boat function. Price IMCO, Teague and others and write that # down. You mentioned that your price on OSO as $30K for two drives with transom assm. Does that include steering, standoff box, bell-housing, trim pump, drive coupler, rear engine mount, mounting hardware and such or just the outside of the boat?

Now compare the real # and the one from the other Bravo Drive unit alternatives.

Now compare it to the cost of a #7M Kit... Understand now?
Here we go again, Rik read the post back when Bmax first came out there was NO 1.5 Ratio available so when the 1.3 ratio was installed it did effect the top speed. It seems you and others are putting the Bmax down for things that happened before I took over the company.
I'm like others on here never owned one of your drives do to some reasons that have been discussed before. I get phone calls from customers of yours that have spent the money and there boats do not handle the way you say they should. The most recent from a guy in Louisiana I believe that can not get his boat on plane and seems to have a hard time getting answers from you.
NOT everyone or everybody wants to spend 60K to put your drives on there pleasure boat and I don't see why that makes some of the folk on here get so offensive.
I have no problem with your product at all, it definitely has a place in the higher end boat line.
waconda is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 05:13 PM
  #112  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Union, NE
Default

Originally Posted by 4195
Thanks again for everybody's advice, know I have another question. If I go with an Imco SCX upper can I bolt am XR lower on it? I know it is not the strongest but at least I could save some money toil next season or later this season. With the Imco I need the helmet change( another $995) Do I need any changes on steering! If I go with the Bmax I can put a Bravo lower with a shaft change plus they want you to upgrade to the Imco gimbal ring. No steering changes but you still have the shaft change as well.
I only mentioned the gimbal ring for your own safety, it has nothing to do with the drive going on your boat. I would still change it going to a SCX or staying with a XR. I have had friends crash there boats after putting in bigger power and the gimbal ring breaking. You have a big boat and big power and the stock ring will be maxed out.
waconda is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 05:22 PM
  #113  
4195's Avatar
Thread Starter
Can You Hear Me Now??
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 102
From: Old Saybrook CT
Default

Originally Posted by waconda
I only mentioned the gimbal ring for your own safety, it has nothing to do with the drive going on your boat. I would still change it going to a SCX or staying with a XR. I have had friends crash there boats after putting in bigger power and the gimbal ring breaking. You have a big boat and big power and the stock ring will be maxed out.
Ok thanks for the clarification, I will try to call you tomorrow to discuss.
4195 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 08:07 PM
  #114  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 59
From: Sandusky/Olmsted Falls, OH
Default Interesting thread

Originally Posted by A.O. Razor
I don't remember a Formula doing a #6 swap.

Are you refering to KJM5125s 382 fastech with ASD #7Ms? He's not dialed in yet at all, is most likely running the wrong props and has less than 10 hours total seat time with the drives. He has already picked up 2 mph over hes all time best with the XRs and SC -2s. There is a lot left on the table for that boat. He did have a transmission problem on hes first outing, but Rik and Arneson just shipped him an entire new tranny ready to drop in within a week, so no problems there and none since. It's going to be interesting to follow hes dialing in this season.
These are the exact same questions I had before deciding on Arnesons.
I'm still not dialed dialed in yet. Looking for top end while on Lake Erie can be tough. My final run of the season, in calm water, I hit 78 GPS and the only reason it was not higher is that I was in a harbor and I ran out of room. I still had plenty of throttle left. All I can say is 2012 will be interesting.
kjm5125 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 08:13 PM
  #115  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 59
From: Sandusky/Olmsted Falls, OH
Default

With the XR's and shorties the best I ever saw was 81.3 GPS in perfect conditions. With the Arneson's, the second time out, in rough conditions, I hit +/- 83 GPS. I thought that was pretty good considering the boat handles differently with the new drives.
kjm5125 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 08:37 PM
  #116  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 59
From: Sandusky/Olmsted Falls, OH
Default

Site will not let me upload. Maybe later
kjm5125 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 09:04 PM
  #117  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 375
From: Traverse City MI
Default

ANY one on here that is Skeptical of the Arneson, are you also skeptical of the #6, NXT, M8. Indy, BPM, etc?

Well you must be or you would be a hypocrite, right? Since they ALL are surface drives!!

Seriously, people crack me up. Just enjoy your broken bravos then, and let the rest of us have fun!

The reason you don't see many people on here talking about how much they love their Arneson??? They are actually out on the water enjoying reliable boating while the rest of us are dreaming about it on OSO!
offshorexcursion is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 09:19 PM
  #118  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 59
From: Sandusky/Olmsted Falls, OH
Default

Finally got it to work

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU3S3B3VjcU
kjm5125 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 11:15 PM
  #119  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by waconda
Here we go again, Rik read the post back when Bmax first came out there was NO 1.5 Ratio available so when the 1.3 ratio was installed it did effect the top speed. It seems you and others are putting the Bmax down for things that happened before I took over the company.
I'm like others on here never owned one of your drives do to some reasons that have been discussed before. I get phone calls from customers of yours that have spent the money and there boats do not handle the way you say they should. The most recent from a guy in Louisiana I believe that can not get his boat on plane and seems to have a hard time getting answers from you.
NOT everyone or everybody wants to spend 60K to put your drives on there pleasure boat and I don't see why that makes some of the folk on here get so offensive.
I have no problem with your product at all, it definitely has a place in the higher end boat line.

I never stated anything about Your Company "BMAX" and speed loss, I merely quoted your statements after your derogatorily statements were posted. I prefer not to comment on matters that do not apply to me but have no fear to post facts. Your reference to Jerry in Louisiana, who took a BMAX off and replaced it with an Arneson might have hurt your feelings but I cannot worry about that.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 11:23 PM
  #120  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
ANY one on here that is Skeptical of the Arneson, are you also skeptical of the #6, NXT, M8. Indy, BPM, etc?

Well you must be or you would be a hypocrite, right? Since they ALL are surface drives!!

Seriously, people crack me up. Just enjoy your broken bravos then, and let the rest of us have fun!

The reason you don't see many people on here talking about how much they love their Arneson??? They are actually out on the water enjoying reliable boating while the rest of us are dreaming about it on OSO!
I get a kick out of the same things.

First and foremost, I have spoken to 4195 on the phone and even he will tell everyone I said that the boat should have been originally equipped with .... Mercury #6 Drives .... as it is to large of a boat for Bravos and they deter from the value of the boat and the quality of boating. That being said, I am not arguing that he should do anything more than he is as I only want to clarify others statements that are incorrect or misleading/misunderstood. Far toooooo many people believe what they read on the internet as fact regardless of where the statements come from.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.