Fu*%ing Theives
05-30-2004 | 04:53 PM
#43
Registered
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 0
From: Lewis Center, Ohio
Re: Fu*%ing Theives
Originally Posted by packinair
My mom can beat up your mom and I think your an a$$hole 
Could not have a totaly adult thread
Hyper, when I had 8 people at gun point in my front yard and the sherriff across the street had 3 at gun point, I was told after the fact by the sherriff that I was 110% justified to drop them all, but if I had fired a warning shot I would have been charged and lost my CCW... NO WARNING SHOTS PERIOD, not for cops, not for anyone
Could not have a totaly adult thread
Hyper, when I had 8 people at gun point in my front yard and the sherriff across the street had 3 at gun point, I was told after the fact by the sherriff that I was 110% justified to drop them all, but if I had fired a warning shot I would have been charged and lost my CCW... NO WARNING SHOTS PERIOD, not for cops, not for anyone
05-30-2004 | 06:04 PM
#47
Gold Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 1
Re: Fu*%ing Theives
"Well you are caught and arrested now for killing (murdering) a guy possibly stealing your ATV, here is what you and your lawyer are talking about now that you have been arrested and processed and in jail waiting for Bail":
"Well Mr. Client we need to talk about the following and see what applies to your case" Let's start with the "perceived" threat to your life or the life of another as he questions away and tries to determine one of the following 3 scenerios:
Imminent is
the strongest: it denotes that something is ready to
fall or happen on the instant; as, in imminent danger
of one's life. Impending denotes that something hangs
suspended over us, and may so remain indefinitely; as,
the impending evils of war. Threatening supposes some
danger in prospect, but more remote; as, threatening
indications for the future.
Your jury verdict hangs on how they see the above 3 definitions describing your reasons for using deadly force fitting the circumstances. Imminent danger of your life being taken makes it justifiable. Everything else puts YOUR case and future on hold and in the hands of the Courts.
"Well Mr. Client we need to talk about the following and see what applies to your case" Let's start with the "perceived" threat to your life or the life of another as he questions away and tries to determine one of the following 3 scenerios:
Imminent is
the strongest: it denotes that something is ready to
fall or happen on the instant; as, in imminent danger
of one's life. Impending denotes that something hangs
suspended over us, and may so remain indefinitely; as,
the impending evils of war. Threatening supposes some
danger in prospect, but more remote; as, threatening
indications for the future.
Your jury verdict hangs on how they see the above 3 definitions describing your reasons for using deadly force fitting the circumstances. Imminent danger of your life being taken makes it justifiable. Everything else puts YOUR case and future on hold and in the hands of the Courts.
Last edited by Hydrocruiser; 05-30-2004 at 06:26 PM.
05-30-2004 | 06:07 PM
#48
Enjoy the show
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,353
Likes: 1
From: The Joisey Shore
Re: Fu*%ing Theives
Great thread.
All this makes sense but I'd like to see one change in the law. When someone commits a felony crime, they should loose all their rights. Meaning, family can't sue for damages incurred during the crime. However, someone could be punished for shooting the person during the crime, but the criminal can't seek damages.
All this makes sense but I'd like to see one change in the law. When someone commits a felony crime, they should loose all their rights. Meaning, family can't sue for damages incurred during the crime. However, someone could be punished for shooting the person during the crime, but the criminal can't seek damages.
Re: Fu*%ing Theives
