Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
We hurt the 496.... >

We hurt the 496....

Notices

We hurt the 496....

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-02-2024 | 01:47 PM
  #271  
Thread Starter
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 2,142
From: SW Ohio
Default

Guys,


A block and its internals. The crank is on the front passenger floorboard.


Look at that hone….

Gotta get it all to the builder now.


The virtually brand new machine the work was done on. Nothing more than a 4 axis CMC bed mill, really, set up specifically to do engine blocks. But it’s still pretty cool. I didn’t get a pic of the honing machine, but it’s pretty cool, too. It can hold +/- .0002” size and taper. Again, pretty cool to me when my interests and profession intersect.


Also got the ACR circuit buttoned up today.

Starting to work on fuel plumbing next.

Thanks. Brad.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-2024 | 04:01 PM
  #272  
Registered
Community Builder
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 420
From: BC
Default

The new honing machines are pretty big step up. Sense the rotating resistance etc.

Looking good.
Tartilla is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-2024 | 04:14 PM
  #273  
Registered
Community Builder
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 420
From: BC
Default

Brad, are you still running the stock lifters with dog bone style roller lifter alignment?

​​​​Not trying to bust your &@!!s here...just seeing some potential factors.

The factory rollers with dogbones only have 0.570" lift before they have issues with the alloted travel on the machined surface for the dogbone retainer. Essentially they can come out of the dogbone on a small base circle from a high lift cam. Different perspectives on this. Some say max lobe loft of 0.350"...some 0.375". Either way...a need to know.

Did I miss that you're getting new lifters too?

Last edited by Tartilla; 11-02-2024 at 05:54 PM.
Tartilla is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-2024 | 04:53 PM
  #274  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,989
Likes: 6,484
From: Chicago
Default

One of everything .. I`m jealous !!!
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-2024 | 07:45 PM
  #275  
Thread Starter
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 2,142
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Tartilla
Brad, are you still running the stock lifters with dog bone style roller lifter alignment?

​​​​Not trying to bust your &@!!s here...just seeing some potential factors.

The factory rollers with dogbones only have 0.570" lift before they have issues with the alloted travel on the machined surface for the dogbone retainer. Essentially they can come out of the dogbone on a small base circle from a high lift cam. Different perspectives on this. Some say max lobe loft of 0.350"...some 0.375". Either way...a need to know.

Did I miss that you're getting new lifters too?
Tartilla,

Builder mentioned a long time ago that we don’t need to address lifters as long as they are in good shape, which they are. Again, that was before discussing a new cam. My math says .369” lobe loft on the exhaust. I’ll run it by him. Well back off the cam numbers if it’s gonna be an issue.

Thanks. Brad.

Last edited by Brad Christy; 11-02-2024 at 07:55 PM.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-2024 | 11:41 PM
  #276  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,154
Likes: 3,714
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

..messed up my edit. Oh well. Lol.
Basically it said…
Many have used the gm dogbones on the old crane cam cams up to .610/.632 …..but yeh, always ck in case.

Last edited by SB; 11-03-2024 at 05:55 AM.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-2024 | 02:41 AM
  #277  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,838
Likes: 928
Default

Originally Posted by SB
..messed up my edit. Oh well. Lol.
Badically it said…
Many have used the gm digbones on the okd crane cam cams up to .610/.632 …..but yeh, always ck in case.
I would buy new lifters. Even if old ones are good for the application. I would go with Johnson’s. Cheap insurance.
1MOSES1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-2024 | 09:48 AM
  #278  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 267
Likes: 142
Default

I know everything adds up in cost doing this build, but I too would go with new lifters. Have seen many fail in many different engines for various reasons. Who wants to tear an engine down to replace them, seems like somewhat cheap insurance to keep from ripping motor apart later.
zfrilly is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-2024 | 02:12 PM
  #279  
Registered
Community Builder
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 420
From: BC
Default

Originally Posted by zfrilly
I know everything adds up in cost doing this build, but I too would go with new lifters. Have seen many fail in many different engines for various reasons. Who wants to tear an engine down to replace them, seems like somewhat cheap insurance to keep from ripping motor apart later.
Not to mention you're asking these used lifters to perform at their maximum effort. What would the inspection plan be to ensure the cam/lifters are healthy?

Perf GM BBC stock lifters are not that much $$.

Then you could sell your used cam/lifters as a set. Recover some $$. If they are gtg...then they have value. Otherwise...they aren't worth putting in with a higher intensity cam.
Tartilla is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-2024 | 05:36 PM
  #280  
Thread Starter
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 2,142
From: SW Ohio
Default

Guys,


This is a .365” lobe loft cam. We are looking at .369”. There’s somewhere in the .050-.100” range clearance at apex.

Thanks. Brad.

Last edited by Brad Christy; 11-04-2024 at 06:36 AM.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.