Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Saber
Saber 101 >

Saber 101

Notices

Saber 101

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-12-2011 | 12:38 PM
  #191  
Sick Stinger's Avatar
Brotherhood #1
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,026
Likes: 111
From: Swansea Mass
Default

1k
Sick Stinger is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 02:33 PM
  #192  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 2
From: West Michigan
Default

Have you guys talked to Kirk from Elite Marine? He had a 28 Panera with a Konrad and huge power and I don't think he ever got his running right. No idea what his issue was, but maybe he can shed a little light on his struggles and maybe some things for you guys to check.

On another note, I'm pretty sure Art's boat is the lightest 28 that Saber built.
BGIII is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 03:34 PM
  #193  
mrv8outboard's Avatar
coolrunning racing
25 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 561
Likes: 4
From: cape cod
Default

1k would be like 1' try like 5000 lbs at 10'.
mrv8outboard is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 03:38 PM
  #194  
mrv8outboard's Avatar
coolrunning racing
25 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 561
Likes: 4
From: cape cod
Default

The engine and drive package is close to a TRS set up. Now just add the weight of the blower and cooler and the box.
mrv8outboard is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 04:08 PM
  #195  
DONZI's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
From: BRIDGEWATER MA.
Lightbulb

Post * 10 on TRS comparison on this thread +
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...ive-weigh.html

Last edited by DONZI; 11-12-2011 at 04:15 PM.
DONZI is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 07:15 PM
  #196  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

Originally Posted by DONZI
Post * 10 on TRS comparison on this thread +
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...ive-weigh.html
That does not take into account the external steering, box, transmision that is inside the box and all outside the transom.

Based on what I have found the TRS drive only is 122 pounds. So if you add the 50 from what Kurt said on the other tread you are at 170 pounds. I have no idea how much the box weighs in at? Transmision is about 109 pounds if it is a 72C plus fluids. I would guess the gimbal is about 30-40 pounds more then a bravo. So what does the box weigh 100 pounds? If we assume that is close that puts us as 410 pounds. probably 250 more then a bravo. Don't forget however that 410 pounds is about 12" or so farther back then it would be with out the box. So to counter this I would think that the 500 pounds in the bow is probably close. Now add the weight of the blower and rigging.... Probably another couple hundo pounds? That is all well behind what should be the center of gravity. Even the gas tank is wall behind were I think the center of gravity should be (behind the drivers and passangers bolsters). I am not sure 500 pounds is enough!
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 07:36 PM
  #197  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 2
From: Rehoboth, Ma.
Talking

NOW I know why Gerry wants me to come for the test! I weigh
275lbs.! Never thought I could be the deciding factor in this
experiment. I've been called alot of things in my life...but a "sand
bag". I guess a man has to do what a man has to do when he's
called upon. That's what friends are for.
OLD MAN is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 11:21 PM
  #198  
AIR TIME's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,283
Likes: 1
From: EASTON MA.
Default

Originally Posted by hotjava66
My thoughts too, completely new untried untested setup and has only been out a couple times. This boat is one of a handfull of sub 30' vees I would put that kind of power in. Maybe moving some weight around will help, but if they run fine as twins??? All depends on where exactly the CG is, but a 100 gallon tank behind the seat at roughly 6-700lbs full on a shorter arm than a 1000 lb big block plus outdrive on a longer arm should impart less of a rearward bias. Unless the CG is way back and the under floor tanks give have a long forward arm/bias I really dont know the answer to that. I still have the gut feeling it is more of a prop thing or outdrive placement/leverage thing but I am no marine engineer. I would be VERY interested to know the results of a bottom blueprint, removing the rocker and sharpening the strakes/transom. I have thought about it but would like to see someone do it first. Art, you are more than welcome to be the one to do it I know there is some rocker designed in, but is there hook as well, and if so what for?
Artie will try anything,well will see what 500lbs of sand will do.90% sure its not drive height, like I said 1st time out. boat gets on plane to easy with 4 or 5 blade.I talked to Doug again from saber. he didn't realize I had box with tranny. if he did he would of put new tank in floor. still will need to find a p5 prop over the winter, that might work with this set up.. well going to read the rest of the posts.
AIR TIME is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 11:44 PM
  #199  
AIR TIME's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,283
Likes: 1
From: EASTON MA.
Default

Originally Posted by mrv8outboard
The problem is the bottom. Why do I say this without seeing the issue first hand? Because any one that has gone and had a bottom blueprinted or a good straight bottom knows any of the many changes Art has tried would have made moderate differences when tried. When these changes (these haven't been settle) have little effect the bottom is toast.
If it was me, I would throw out the fuel tank (I would have never put the fuel tank were it is,ever.) and put one in the hull between the stringers, pull the engine and drive, flip the hull over and blueprint it. Then mount the tabs flat and have room to move the engine forward if needed.

Artie, sorry to be hard on you but if you want this hull to be safe and work it is the only way to go.

P.S. It would be hard to dump the hull only for any good amount of money due to the dirty laundry aired about it here.
jeb these hulls are in high demand mine with a b1 set would do fine for mid hp. I have had 4 people pm me over the last 2 years about taking over this, but with no power or drive like I bought it. but now has a new tank in it.

jeb I thought that last week after the drive heights made no different. said that to the boys on the dock about moving motor/tank. next sand bags to see if tank needs to be moved. these boats were built with the tanks behind the seat for balance and run good with b1 drives singles. twin boats run wider strakes and chine and gas tank between seats floor.bottom of boat has rocker about 8'' back I still think a stearn lifting prop might level the boat out.worst case next year I have to install new gas tank in floor grand, then cut out old new tank repair bulkhead move 4'' other wise my headers will need work another grand.bottom not worried about now. if its straight after the 6 or 8'' to the front. then just grind lay some glass build up sand paint easy. if its more space then yes about 3 grand for a pro to go over it. I hope its a prop and new tank in the floor only. Iwas real close in doing that too. so I would of picked up more room for the blower. theres props without defuser rings longer hubs and these all play with the ride boat gets on plane real easy. I''ll post after tomorrow.
AIR TIME is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-2011 | 11:48 PM
  #200  
AIR TIME's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,283
Likes: 1
From: EASTON MA.
Default

Originally Posted by hotjava66
Just wondering why you think the bottom is no good? As far as I have heard it didnt act like this before his current set up was put together, so something changed for the worse. What would cause the bottom to go bad, being messed with or something? Mine runs and rides great, I get a lot of compliments on it when guys with other boats have ridden on mine.
rides good over the few wakes I ran over. bottom has not been touched, and that would be a last think to do. thanks for chiming in and you to Jeb.
AIR TIME is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.