Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   Marine Lubrication (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/107808-marine-lubrication.html)

Hydrocruiser 12-04-2008 05:04 PM

These guys make GRP V Synthetic oils and gearlubes. Top Drawer stuff!!

http://www.neosyntheticoil.com/gear_oil.html

Hydrocruiser 12-04-2008 08:22 PM

Another extremely great product. All Motul synthetics are double ester GRP V bases. The best of the best.

http://www.motorspotstore.com/gearcomp75w140.html

This 75w-140 works fine in Bravo's as it is a double ester that remains at 75W unless it's heated up to extreme temps. Very unusual feaures in this product.

07DominatorSS 12-04-2008 09:04 PM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2752790)
...ever see Amsoil products doing as good or worse in thier "studies"?..:)


Amsoil Severe Gear and Torco products are comparible I think as the Torco synthetic gear lubes are GL-6 rated.

I ran M-1 syn gear lube and it is also really good as is Royal Purple's gearlube.

Just an fyi...Merc HP gearlube is not be be discounted....it works well...however...I didn't see as much on the magnet when I went over to a syn.


All I can say about "doing as good or worse in their studies?" is if the test was biased, they would be number 1 in every category. Also, I would like to see another company compare themselves to AMSOIL. You never see Mobil compare themselves to them. They always compare themselves against the Pennzoils, Castrols and whatnot. Royal Purple is garbage. Its not half the product it used to be ten years ago or so. Motul is typically a really good product, however, for at least twice the cost, its not that much better.

Rebel_Heart 12-04-2008 09:18 PM

I've been running Royal Purple gear lube because of recommendations from people setting up drives on this forum. Is it really garbage? And, if so compare directly to amsoil or Mobil 1.

Rage 12-05-2008 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2752790)
...ever see Amsoil products doing as good or worse in thier "studies"?..:)


Amsoil Severe Gear and Torco products are comparible I think as the Torco synthetic gear lubes are GL-6 rated.

I ran M-1 syn gear lube and it is also really good as is Royal Purple's gearlube.

Just an fyi...Merc HP gearlube is not be be discounted....it works well...however...I didn't see as much on the magnet when I went over to a syn.

Actually yes, often on individual tests the Amsoil test data posted for their product is not as good as some of the compettive products or is equal to them. On their summation of all tests / overall rating Amsoil is always #1 as you say.

http://www.amsoil.com/products/gearl...hitePaper.aspx

I was particularly interested to see that the Red Line 75W-90 was quite a bit better than the Amsoil Severe Gear Lube in the ASTM D-3233 Falex Extreme Pressure Test and that was not even the Red Line Shock Proof Gear Lube which according to Red Line's ASTM D-2596 heavy load test data has roughly half the wear of the basic Red Line. The Torco SGO Synthetic results on the ASTM-3233 test was also better than the Amsoil.

Of the ASTM test protcols that Amsoil used, which (if any) would you consider useful and which would you not in evaluating a drive oil's merits?

Rage 12-05-2008 10:50 AM


Originally Posted by Rebel_Heart (Post 2753009)
I've been running Royal Purple gear lube because of recommendations from people setting up drives on this forum. Is it really garbage? And, if so compare directly to amsoil or Mobil 1.

Consider the source relative to the overall conclusion but it is comprised of lubricant test results per individual ASTM test procedures (that the lubrication industry has designed and ASTM
http://www.astm.org/ABOUT/aboutASTM.html
has approved for release as an ASTM procedure).

http://www.amsoil.com/products/gearl...hitePaper.aspx

Rage 12-05-2008 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2752966)
Another extremely great product. All Motul synthetics are double ester GRP V bases. The best of the best.

http://www.motorspotstore.com/gearcomp75w140.html

This 75w-140 works fine in Bravo's as it is a double ester that remains at 75W unless it's heated up to extreme temps. Very unusual feaures in this product.

Hydrocruiser,

Anything about these guys?
http://www.le-inc.com/

minxguy 12-05-2008 02:34 PM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2752790)
...ever see Amsoil products doing as good or worse in thier "studies"?..:)


Amsoil Severe Gear and Torco products are comparible I think as the Torco synthetic gear lubes are GL-6 rated.

A GL-6 rating is no longer recognized by the API.
The most prevelant gear lubr rating currently is GL-5.

The GL-6 rating has been out of vouge for maybe 20 years or so.

Ken

minxguy 12-05-2008 02:40 PM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2752966)
Another extremely great product. All Motul synthetics are double ester GRP V bases. The best of the best.

Double ester....a mix of two different esters?

http://www.motorspotstore.com/gearcomp75w140.html

This 75w-140 works fine in Bravo's as it is a double ester that remains at 75W unless it's heated up to extreme temps. Very unusual feaures in this product.

A 75w-140 is a multi viscosity, just like a 80w90 or a 10w40 engine oil.

All multi viscosity oils act like the lower number(only in cold weather tests, the "W" means winter) and will THIN to a viscosity which equates to the higher number at 210*F.

210* is the most extreme temp the API tests and qualifies oil at.

Ken

SpeedMaster 12-05-2008 04:48 PM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2752966)
Another extremely great product. All Motul synthetics are double ester GRP V bases. The best of the best.

http://www.motorspotstore.com/gearcomp75w140.html

This 75w-140 works fine in Bravo's as it is a double ester that remains at 75W unless it's heated up to extreme temps. Very unusual feaures in this product.

Do you know anyone who runs this oil in a Bravo drive?

The Motul 300v series that you state are great are ALL 'catalytic converter' recommended, including there motor cycle oil, does that mean there is a low ZDDP content?

07DominatorSS 12-05-2008 05:06 PM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2753283)
Actually yes, often on individual tests the Amsoil test data posted for their product is not as good as some of the compettive products or is equal to them. On their summation of all tests / overall rating Amsoil is always #1 as you say.

http://www.amsoil.com/products/gearl...hitePaper.aspx

I was particularly interested to see that the Red Line 75W-90 was quite a bit better than the Amsoil Severe Gear Lube in the ASTM D-3233 Falex Extreme Pressure Test and that was not even the Red Line Shock Proof Gear Lube which according to Red Line's ASTM D-2596 heavy load test data has roughly half the wear of the basic Red Line. The Torco SGO Synthetic results on the ASTM-3233 test was also better than the Amsoil.

Of the ASTM test protcols that Amsoil used, which (if any) would you consider useful and which would you not in evaluating a drive oil's merits?


Personally, I think they are all important, but if you really want just few to single out, those few would be as follows........
1. Viscosity Index: if a gearlube thins out too much when heated, its not going to protect as well.
2.Shear Stability Test: If a gearlube shears down too much, it also won't protect as well under extreme conditions, such as drives. Thats the one that really caught my eye, in the fact that both Lucas and Royal Purple don't even meet spec at initial viscosity for a 75w-90.
3. Oxidation Test
4.Extreme Pressure Test: For obvious reasons. Drive are under such extreme load and pressures that gearlube has to be a superior product, otherwise things are going to fail!
5. Water Resisitance, I think is huge. Especially in outdrives. The AMSOIL Marine Gearlube can be polluted with 10% water, and not have any effect on it, and last time I checked boats usually are in water.

bob 12-05-2008 08:58 PM

I run the Amsoil 75-90 marine gear lube and change it every 35-50 hours....sorry don't know the numbers. Bottom line is that i have #5's with 900+ in front of them. We went 200 hours and TNT pulled the drives down. They couldn't believe the lack of wear. Put some lower bearings in as a preventive measure and they said to just keep the same maintenance schedule. I was very pleased :).

Hydrocruiser 12-05-2008 10:39 PM

Motul ZDDP
 

Originally Posted by SpeedMaster (Post 2753603)
Do you know anyone who runs this oil in a Bravo drive?

The Motul 300v series that you state are great are ALL 'catalytic converter' recommended, including there motor cycle oil, does that mean there is a low ZDDP content?

Motul has 1150 od ZInc and 1150 of Phos.

Moly 867 and Ca of 1300

Hydrocruiser 12-05-2008 10:40 PM


Originally Posted by bob (Post 2753803)
I run the Amsoil 75-90 marine gear lube and change it every 35-50 hours....sorry don't know the numbers. Bottom line is that i have #5's with 900+ in front of them. We went 200 hours and TNT pulled the drives down. They couldn't believe the lack of wear. Put some lower bearings in as a preventive measure and they said to just keep the same maintenance schedule. I was very pleased :).

At a race last season Amsoil's rep told me to use Severe Gear Amsoil in HP Bravo's.

Hydrocruiser 12-05-2008 10:41 PM


Originally Posted by Rebel_Heart (Post 2753009)
I've been running Royal Purple gear lube because of recommendations from people setting up drives on this forum. Is it really garbage? And, if so compare directly to amsoil or Mobil 1.


It's not garbage it's real good.

Rage 12-06-2008 12:51 AM

I regularly do engine oil analysis. What will an oil analysis tell you about drive gear oil that one would need to know or is that a waste of time and money?

07DominatorSS 12-06-2008 02:35 AM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2753886)
I regularly do engine oil analysis. What will an oil analysis tell you about drive gear oil that one would need to know or is that a waste of time and money?

The same thing that an engine oil analysis will. Is there oxidation, nitration, water, breakdown of additives, wear metals, dirt. All of the above. I think it is a really good idea to test the drives. I am still waiting for my results on both drives and engines.

07DominatorSS 12-06-2008 02:36 AM


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2753849)
It's not garbage it's real good.

Its real good, yet doesn't meet some specs, hmmm???

minxguy 12-06-2008 06:07 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2753844)
Motul has 1150 od ZInc and 1150 of Phos.

Moly 867 and Ca of 1300

Motul 3000 new oil.

Ken

minxguy 12-06-2008 06:13 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Some other reading.

All new samples.

Ken

minxguy 12-06-2008 06:24 AM

3 Attachment(s)
More reading.........

minxguy 12-06-2008 06:31 AM

1 Attachment(s)
And finally.

All new, unused oils.

Ken

Rage 12-06-2008 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by 07DominatorSS (Post 2753894)
The same thing that an engine oil analysis will. Is there oxidation, nitration, water, breakdown of additives, wear metals, dirt. All of the above. I think it is a really good idea to test the drives. I am still waiting for my results on both drives and engines.

What is nitration?

minxguy 12-06-2008 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2754061)
What is nitration?

Personally, I have never heard of that term relating to oil.

Addivives don't break down, they get consumed or depleated, used up.

Polymers shear or break down, this causes the oil to break down or fall out of grade.

Ken

07DominatorSS 12-06-2008 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2754061)
What is nitration?

Nitration: The combustion chambers of engines provide one of the few environments where there is sufficient heat and pressure to break the atmospheric nitrogen molecule down to two atoms that can react with oxygen to form nitrous oxides (NOx). This becomes a major problem for some engines, especially natural gas engines. Because natural gas engines run so lean, they have higher combustion temperatures and a lot more NOx are formed than with other types of fuel. When nitrogen oxide products enter the lube oil through normal blow-by, they react with moisture present in the lube and become very acidic and rapidly accelerate the oxidation rate of the oil.

Really doesn't apply to Gearlubes, but definitely motor oils.

07DominatorSS 12-06-2008 12:00 PM


Originally Posted by minxguy (Post 2753923)
And finally.

All new, unused oils.

Ken

12 PPM of Silicon??? That is new oil. Silicon is typically dirt. Brand new dirty oil, hmmm.

Rage 12-06-2008 01:18 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Attached are my engine oil analysis since the motor was new, one per season. Unfortunately my engine is a moving target since I have made modifications each winter which are noted at the bottom of the oil analysis history sheet. After each modification there was a recalibration phase of the Mercruiser PCM555 ECU during which time was spent running boat with ECU calibration at certain rpm's being richer than optimum always occuring at low rpm's and mid range rpm's. A/F target is 12.5. The stock 496HO produced moderate to heavy transum sooting. The next two seasons was about half that. This last season the tune was more in the low 13's A/F with lowest in the low 12's and transum soot was almost non existant. This fact makes the latest high gasolene content in the oil extermely confusing to me. Prior to installing the Amsoil oil for this most recent season I broke in the engine rebuild for a total of three hours with two oil and filter changes, one after 15 min engine flush and the other after 3 hours run time with stock Merc 20W40 oil. The high gasolene content during the preceeding season was expected since early ECU cal was in the 10's and flooded the engine followed later by an intake lifter failure that ran the engine on seven cylinders flooding that cylinder with raw gas for a time. As noted I have run stock Merc, Mobil 1 V Twin and Amsoil Racing oils. Analysis of the virgin Amsoil and Mobil 1 are also included. I tend to spend a lot of boat hours cruising at 2500 - 3000 rpm's and wake boarding at similar speeds.

You knowledgable comment on the results is solicited especially relative to any red flags I should be aware of.

Rage 12-06-2008 01:30 PM

I should clarify that the Merc 20w40 oil analysis provided was not the original oil in the motor but installed after a few hours running on the original oil (boat purchased in the Fall so short season).

minxguy 12-06-2008 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by 07DominatorSS (Post 2754089)
Nitration: The combustion chambers of engines provide one of the few environments where there is sufficient heat and pressure to break the atmospheric nitrogen molecule down to two atoms that can react with oxygen to form nitrous oxides (NOx). This becomes a major problem for some engines, especially natural gas engines. Because natural gas engines run so lean, they have higher combustion temperatures and a lot more NOx are formed than with other types of fuel. When nitrogen oxide products enter the lube oil through normal blow-by, they react with moisture present in the lube and become very acidic and rapidly accelerate the oxidation rate of the oil.

Really doesn't apply to Gearlubes, but definitely motor oils.

Natural gas engines?....those engines hooked to a natural gas line? Like a stationary engine? Or a propane engine like in a fork lift?

Ken

minxguy 12-06-2008 01:54 PM


Originally Posted by 07DominatorSS (Post 2754090)
12 PPM of Silicon??? That is new oil. Silicon is typically dirt. Brand new dirty oil, hmmm.

As new as new could be.

Ken

minxguy 12-06-2008 02:24 PM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2754133)
Attached are my engine oil analysis since the motor was new, one per season. Unfortunately my engine is a moving target since I have made modifications each winter which are noted at the bottom of the oil analysis history sheet. After each modification there was a recalibration phase of the Mercruiser PCM555 ECU during which time was spent running boat with ECU calibration at certain rpm's being richer than optimum always occuring at low rpm's and mid range rpm's. A/F target is 12.5. The stock 496HO produced moderate to heavy transum sooting. The next two seasons was about half that. This last season the tune was more in the low 13's A/F with lowest in the low 12's and transum soot was almost non existant. This fact makes the latest high gasolene content in the oil extermely confusing to me. Prior to installing the Amsoil oil for this most recent season I broke in the engine rebuild for a total of three hours with two oil and filter changes, one after 15 min engine flush and the other after 3 hours run time with stock Merc 20W40 oil. The high gasolene content during the preceeding season was expected since early ECU cal was in the 10's and flooded the engine followed later by an intake lifter failure that ran the engine on seven cylinders flooding that cylinder with raw gas for a time. As noted I have run stock Merc, Mobil 1 V Twin and Amsoil Racing oils. Analysis of the virgin Amsoil and Mobil 1 are also included. I tend to spend a lot of boat hours cruising at 2500 - 3000 rpm's and wake boarding at similar speeds.

You knowledgable comment on the results is solicited especially relative to any red flags I should be aware of.

I is unfortunate that you are having fuel dilution issues, you can see the impact it has on the viscosity.
Are both the used Amsoil results from the same blend as the virgin sample?

I see in the virgin samples that Mobil V-Twin is a much heavier 50 than Amsoil. The Mobil is almost 14 SUS heavier than the Amsoil right out of the bottle.
The SAE range for 50 weight at 210 is 85-110 SUS. The Mobil is very strong at 102.7, the Amsoil is barely a 50 with 88.8.

If you are going to "running fat" the heavier 50 (Mobil) will stand up to fuel dilution way better because it starts out heavier(thicker). All the oils run lost viscosity, the 50's dropped to a 40 and the Mercury dropped to a 30. 40 wt at 210 is 70-85 SUS, the Mercury ended up at 62.7.

If you feel that you ECM is as close as you are going to get it and the fuel ratio is good, I would start looking at oil temp to see if you can cook some of the fuel dilution away. Oil has to be at a min 180-190, on the high end 240 is ok.

Ken

Rage 12-07-2008 12:30 AM

Ken,

Thanks for the input.

No the virgin Amsoil was from the first batch I purchased. The second Amsoil change was a batch purchased later.

All data was with the stock 496HO oil cooler which is not thermostatically controlled so the engine oil temperature is not controlled. However that oil cooler is insufficient capacity for the hp I am now running. I have been experiencing significant oil pressure drop at WOT with the latest engine configuration even with the addition of a high volume oil pump with that build. I have been advised that is likely do to high oil temperatures because of the insufficient oil cooler capacity. I noted that fact to the oil analysis lab and is why their comment stating that oil overheat was not evident in the oil. I had made quite a few A/F vs RPM runs up to WOT for the ECU recal work which caused the noted oil pressure drop. Should that have cooked out the gas?

I am adding a thermostatically (212F) controlled oil cooler of appropriate capacity this winter as well as an oil temperature gage.

I now recall that the fuel pressure when the engine is turned off now is bleeding off in a few hours where as before it would hold almost indefinately. That I suspicion may be my problem ie a leaking injector dumping some fuel into the engine everytime I shut down. Is that enough fuel for the gas content in the oil recorded this last time do you think?

What about the double the iron content in the used Mobil1 versus the Merc and both the Amsoil oils when normalized (linear) for the same engine hours?
THanks again.

Bill


Originally Posted by minxguy (Post 2754173)
I is unfortunate that you are having fuel dilution issues, you can see the impact it has on the viscosity.
Are both the used Amsoil results from the same blend as the virgin sample?

I see in the virgin samples that Mobil V-Twin is a much heavier 50 than Amsoil. The Mobil is almost 14 SUS heavier than the Amsoil right out of the bottle.
The SAE range for 50 weight at 210 is 85-110 SUS. The Mobil is very strong at 102.7, the Amsoil is barely a 50 with 88.8.

If you are going to "running fat" the heavier 50 (Mobil) will stand up to fuel dilution way better because it starts out heavier(thicker). All the oils run lost viscosity, the 50's dropped to a 40 and the Mercury dropped to a 30. 40 wt at 210 is 70-85 SUS, the Mercury ended up at 62.7.

If you feel that you ECM is as close as you are going to get it and the fuel ratio is good, I would start looking at oil temp to see if you can cook some of the fuel dilution away. Oil has to be at a min 180-190, on the high end 240 is ok.

Ken


minxguy 12-07-2008 06:42 AM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2754438)
Ken,

Thanks for the input.

No the virgin Amsoil was from the first batch I purchased. The second Amsoil change was a batch purchased later.

All data was with the stock 496HO oil cooler which is not thermostatically controlled so the engine oil temperature is not controlled. However that oil cooler is insufficient capacity for the hp I am now running. I have been experiencing significant oil pressure drop at WOT with the latest engine configuration even with the addition of a high volume oil pump with that build. I have been advised that is likely do to high oil temperatures because of the insufficient oil cooler capacity. I noted that fact to the oil analysis lab and is why their comment stating that oil overheat was not evident in the oil. I had made quite a few A/F vs RPM runs up to WOT for the ECU recal work which caused the noted oil pressure drop. Should that have cooked out the gas?

I am adding a thermostatically (212F) controlled oil cooler of appropriate capacity this winter as well as an oil temperature gage.

I now recall that the fuel pressure when the engine is turned off now is bleeding off in a few hours where as before it would hold almost indefinately. That I suspicion may be my problem ie a leaking injector dumping some fuel into the engine everytime I shut down. Is that enough fuel for the gas content in the oil recorded this last time do you think?

What about the double the iron content in the used Mobil1 versus the Merc and both the Amsoil oils when normalized (linear) for the same engine hours?
THanks again.

Bill

Bill, you could be chasing two problems for your loss of pressure at WOT, your oil cooler could be way too small causing your oil to see 300 plus degrees compounded with you have a fuel dilution problem. At 300 degrees of oil temp, you would flash off any fuel in the oil, but per your post you spend a lot of time in the 2500-3000 range. I would imagine you would be able to smell the fuel in the oil at an oil change.
It doesn't take much fuel (a very low viscosity liquid) to impact the viscosity of oil. (Mobil V-Twin would hold up better, heavier t start). Any %age of fuel in the whole number range (X. VS .X) is not good.

Let me do some research/thinking on the iron side of your question.

Bill, the test results for the Mobil 1 include a bunch of valve train work, I suspect this is where the iron has come from. As the other two tests show, the PPM of iron has dropped.

Still pound for pound and dollar for dollar, I would continue to purchase the Mobil V-Twin.

My 2 cents on the whole thing and I hoped it helped.



Ken

Rage 12-07-2008 02:12 PM

Ken,

You have been helpful.

To clarify I do/did spend a lot of time at 2500 - 3000 rpm but just before I changed the oil this last time I did none of that but did do a whole bunch of WOT running (including with the oil pressure drop) to obtain A/F vs RPM data for the ECU recal work. That same day after the last of these runs I changed the oil and sampled for the oil analysis (after I warmed to oil for about 15 min. at idle. So I guess by inference I could not have been in the 300F oil temp range as explanation for the oil pressure drop because I still had fuel in the oil afterwards. Does that make sense?

It is plausable that the new heads/valve train produced the high iron content. I did do the solvent wash and soap and power wash to the bare iron heads before install. Maybe iron oxide was the culprit. The heads also came with the thin bronze guides which were snug on the valve stems. I contribute the high copper content to the guide break in wear as well. There of course would then be no iron wear from the valve guides. I retained the original lifters but changed to Crane aluminun roller rockers and Crane cam. I will give the M1 another shot sometime later after I use the Amsoil I have.

Do you have any data on at what A/F threshold gas starts showing up in the oil for NA engines in quantities that are significant to the oils performance ?

At lets say 3% gas can you smell it from the oil fill tube?

Thanks,

Bill


Originally Posted by minxguy (Post 2754485)
Bill, you could be chasing two problems for your loss of pressure at WOT, your oil cooler could be way too small causing your oil to see 300 plus degrees compounded with you have a fuel dilution problem. At 300 degrees of oil temp, you would flash off any fuel in the oil, but per your post you spend a lot of time in the 2500-3000 range. I would imagine you would be able to smell the fuel in the oil at an oil change.
It doesn't take much fuel (a very low viscosity liquid) to impact the viscosity of oil. (Mobil V-Twin would hold up better, heavier t start). Any %age of fuel in the whole number range (X. VS .X) is not good.

Let me do some research/thinking on the iron side of your question.

Bill, the test results for the Mobil 1 include a bunch of valve train work, I suspect this is where the iron has come from. As the other two tests show, the PPM of iron has dropped.

Still pound for pound and dollar for dollar, I would continue to purchase the Mobil V-Twin.

My 2 cents on the whole thing and I hoped it helped.



Ken


Hydrocruiser 12-07-2008 05:26 PM

Fuel Dilution-
If unburnt fuel is allowed to enter the lubrication system, the oil will become thinner and more volatile. Both will result in higher oil consumption. Excess fuel can enter and mix with the oil via a leaking fuel injector, fuel pump problem, and restricted air intake or through excessive idling.


A call to Merc is in order if under warranty. 3% per oil change is not acceptable.

minxguy 12-08-2008 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2754700)
Ken,

You have been helpful.

To clarify I do/did spend a lot of time at 2500 - 3000 rpm but just before I changed the oil this last time I did none of that but did do a whole bunch of WOT running (including with the oil pressure drop) to obtain A/F vs RPM data for the ECU recal work. That same day after the last of these runs I changed the oil and sampled for the oil analysis (after I warmed to oil for about 15 min. at idle. So I guess by inference I could not have been in the 300F oil temp range as explanation for the oil pressure drop because I still had fuel in the oil afterwards. Does that make sense?

It is plausable that the new heads/valve train produced the high iron content. I did do the solvent wash and soap and power wash to the bare iron heads before install. Maybe iron oxide was the culprit. The heads also came with the thin bronze guides which were snug on the valve stems. I contribute the high copper content to the guide break in wear as well. There of course would then be no iron wear from the valve guides. I retained the original lifters but changed to Crane aluminun roller rockers and Crane cam. I will give the M1 another shot sometime later after I use the Amsoil I have.

Do you have any data on at what A/F threshold gas starts showing up in the oil for NA engines in quantities that are significant to the oils performance ?

At lets say 3% gas can you smell it from the oil fill tube?

Thanks,

Bill

Bill, I do not have any of the data you asked about, sorry.
As far as smelling the fuel in the oil thru the oil fill tube, I would say unlikely.
You need a "pool" of oil 6-8 ounces to smell it, or just dip your fingers in the oil samole and smell them.

Ken

minxguy 12-08-2008 08:56 AM


Originally Posted by 07DominatorSS (Post 2754090)
12 PPM of Silicon??? That is new oil. Silicon is typically dirt. Brand new dirty oil, hmmm.

Silicon is sometimes used in an additive package as an anti-foam agent.

Ken

Rage 12-08-2008 11:43 AM

What is it about excessive idleing that puts fuel into the oil?


Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2754791)
Fuel Dilution-
If unburnt fuel is allowed to enter the lubrication system, the oil will become thinner and more volatile. Both will result in higher oil consumption. Excess fuel can enter and mix with the oil via a leaking fuel injector, fuel pump problem, and restricted air intake or through excessive idling.


A call to Merc is in order if under warranty. 3% per oil change is not acceptable.


Hydrocruiser 12-08-2008 04:25 PM


Originally Posted by Rage (Post 2755154)
What is it about excessive idleing that puts fuel into the oil?


The most common cause of oil becoming diluted with gasoline is idling - when the engine is cold there are greater clearances between the piston rings and the cylinder walls, and this greater clearance allows small amounts of unburned fuel to slip down into the crankcase.

After a long idle run full bore to burn it off.

If you have 3% gas in the oil; V-Twin M-1 is good cheap insurance.

Rage 12-09-2008 02:56 PM

I guess that is part of the puzzelment since I ran the piss out of the engine just before the oil was drained and still 3% gas?



Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser (Post 2755328)
The most common cause of oil becoming diluted with gasoline is idling - when the engine is cold there are greater clearances between the piston rings and the cylinder walls, and this greater clearance allows small amounts of unburned fuel to slip down into the crankcase.

After a long idle run full bore to burn it off.

If you have 3% gas in the oil; V-Twin M-1 is good cheap insurance.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.